Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Somebody has leaked CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619 in PHP before the patch is out.

Somebody has leaked CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619 in PHP before the patch is out.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
243 Indlæg 153 Posters 11 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

    PHP Foundation’s budget is about 700k a year. It’s used on something like 40 million websites. Almost no company who uses it contributes anything and many people work on it for free.

    The latest trend is cybersecurity and AI vendors have realised they can vampire off its security for publicity (money).

    Perhaps the world would be a better place if those orgs who rely on it just contributed sponsorship to the foundation, and vendors didn’t monetise vulnerabilities for themselves.

    gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gossithedog@cyberplace.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #184

    Security vendor Palo-Alto plans to release patches for their flagship firewall product to fix the PHP vulnerabilities in them sometime next week, after they’ve finished scratching their arse.

    https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2026-109618

    prsfalken@mastodon.socialP tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF l33tname@mastodon.socialL 10 Replies Last reply
    0
    • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

      Security vendor Palo-Alto plans to release patches for their flagship firewall product to fix the PHP vulnerabilities in them sometime next week, after they’ve finished scratching their arse.

      https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2026-109618

      prsfalken@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      prsfalken@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      prsfalken@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #185

      @GossiTheDog No hurries, hmm?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

        Security vendor Palo-Alto plans to release patches for their flagship firewall product to fix the PHP vulnerabilities in them sometime next week, after they’ve finished scratching their arse.

        https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2026-109618

        tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
        tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
        tjbutt58@infosec.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #186

        @GossiTheDog Said arse must be either very large, very itchy, or both.
        That, or their build and test process is borked.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

          Security vendor Palo-Alto plans to release patches for their flagship firewall product to fix the PHP vulnerabilities in them sometime next week, after they’ve finished scratching their arse.

          https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2026-109618

          paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #187

          @GossiTheDog

          sigh...

          PAN: "oh, did you need your firewall to be safe and useful over the next week or so? huh. we'd never have guessed..."

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

            PHP Foundation’s budget is about 700k a year. It’s used on something like 40 million websites. Almost no company who uses it contributes anything and many people work on it for free.

            The latest trend is cybersecurity and AI vendors have realised they can vampire off its security for publicity (money).

            Perhaps the world would be a better place if those orgs who rely on it just contributed sponsorship to the foundation, and vendors didn’t monetise vulnerabilities for themselves.

            caravantraveller@social.cologneC This user is from outside of this forum
            caravantraveller@social.cologneC This user is from outside of this forum
            caravantraveller@social.cologne
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #188

            @GossiTheDog

            Same with heartbleed and openssl at the time. Multi billion corporations should give a couple of millions.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

              Security vendor Palo-Alto plans to release patches for their flagship firewall product to fix the PHP vulnerabilities in them sometime next week, after they’ve finished scratching their arse.

              https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2026-109618

              fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #189

              @GossiTheDog When the newest PAN-OS version is rocking PHP 8.0.30 I assume that they've got themselves into a delightful backport hole.

              An entirely predictable one that is their fault, of course.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                Security vendor Palo-Alto plans to release patches for their flagship firewall product to fix the PHP vulnerabilities in them sometime next week, after they’ve finished scratching their arse.

                https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2026-109618

                l33tname@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                l33tname@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                l33tname@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #190

                @GossiTheDog i don't understand how these "security" people in companies buy from them

                silhouette@dumbfuckingweb.siteS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • l33tname@mastodon.socialL l33tname@mastodon.social

                  @GossiTheDog i don't understand how these "security" people in companies buy from them

                  silhouette@dumbfuckingweb.siteS This user is from outside of this forum
                  silhouette@dumbfuckingweb.siteS This user is from outside of this forum
                  silhouette@dumbfuckingweb.site
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #191

                  @l33tname @GossiTheDog as a "security" person in a company, because the infrastructure was already there and you need some things to accomplish certain functions within the network.

                  l33tname@mastodon.socialL gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                    A really good mitigation for this btw - AppArmor or SELinux.

                    Google something like apparmor restrict php from executing commands. Works against these CVEs.

                    Sucks for cybersecurity vendors who shipped their appliances using PHP without SELinux or AppArmor, of course.

                    cliffsesport@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cliffsesport@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cliffsesport@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #192

                    Thanks for that post, I'm braindead today (recovering Flu/Covid microchips) hadn't realized you could tweak AppArmor/SELinux that way. I'll definitely be digging into that.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                      Security vendor Palo-Alto plans to release patches for their flagship firewall product to fix the PHP vulnerabilities in them sometime next week, after they’ve finished scratching their arse.

                      https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2026-109618

                      raven667@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                      raven667@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                      raven667@hachyderm.io
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #193

                      @GossiTheDog I talked to the network engineers and they were just finishing patching for the last PA management plane RCE on Tuesday, lol. I was most concerned that this affected the public facing web service that hosts GlobalProtect VPN and HIP checks, but that seems to use a different scripting tech than PHP the management plane uses. Management is already ACLd off to just network management subnets, so the biggest risk is Panorama which has a wider audience.

                      I'm beginning to think that complex firewalls with deep packet inspection and SSL VPNs with client posture agents were a mistake, since the central choke point is already a forwarding performance problem (hard to get 100g-400g+traffic through a firewall reliably), the packet inspection screws you when signatures are added/changed silently invalidating something in your policy, securing these complex systems seems to be mission impossible, so the firewall is more liability than help.

                      raven667@hachyderm.ioR bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • silhouette@dumbfuckingweb.siteS silhouette@dumbfuckingweb.site

                        @l33tname @GossiTheDog as a "security" person in a company, because the infrastructure was already there and you need some things to accomplish certain functions within the network.

                        l33tname@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                        l33tname@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                        l33tname@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #194

                        @silhouette but don't you feel it decrease security overall?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • silhouette@dumbfuckingweb.siteS silhouette@dumbfuckingweb.site

                          @l33tname @GossiTheDog as a "security" person in a company, because the infrastructure was already there and you need some things to accomplish certain functions within the network.

                          gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          gossithedog@cyberplace.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #195

                          @silhouette @l33tname I love your domain name here 🤣

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                            PHP Foundation’s budget is about 700k a year. It’s used on something like 40 million websites. Almost no company who uses it contributes anything and many people work on it for free.

                            The latest trend is cybersecurity and AI vendors have realised they can vampire off its security for publicity (money).

                            Perhaps the world would be a better place if those orgs who rely on it just contributed sponsorship to the foundation, and vendors didn’t monetise vulnerabilities for themselves.

                            bontchev@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bontchev@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bontchev@infosec.exchange
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #196

                            @GossiTheDog Our sysadmin and I are currently in the process of fixing the PHP2Shell mess on a couple of dozen sites, using obsolete PHP versions, which can't update, and we do it with a budget of 0, so color me unimpressed.

                            Also, burn PHP with fire.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cliffsesport@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cliffsesport@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cliffsesport@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #197

                              @rogue_cells @GossiTheDog yarp perfect defense or nothing </sarcasm>

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • adhdruid@infosec.exchangeA adhdruid@infosec.exchange

                                @GossiTheDog This argument has always been dumb as rocks.

                                Nobody @ me about entropy. This vulnerability, however severe, backed by more computing power than all non-AI technology combined, still hasn’t been exploited in one of the largest attack surfaces in the world, in all but perfect conditions with config parity.

                                The downsides of ALSR are tiny, and small bus messaging with large addresses spaces on the very, very fast hardware we have these days make it a no brainer to have enabled along with DEP and memory isolation if available to you.

                                Core pinning and isolation in conjunction with these mean all but the most dedicated attacks fail at the first hurdle. And I haven’t seen a single successful attack on systems with those in place.

                                They’re nearly impact-free and built in. I’d argue modern hardware should enforce this by default.

                                People literally balking at defence in depth measures because they can be defeated.

                                cliffsesport@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cliffsesport@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cliffsesport@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #198

                                @ADHDruid @GossiTheDog Druid, do you think going through a class on physical security would help change their perspective? Not IT physical security but personal/family physical security? I still know much more about that type of physical security than computer security, and know a standard element of teaching it by many if not most/all is being a tougher target than others around you deters most attacks that are not targeted.

                                adhdruid@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                                  If you’re wondering why your million dollar cybersecurity vendor appliances don’t have ASLR enabled.

                                  hal8999@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hal8999@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hal8999@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #199

                                  @GossiTheDog We all know that full-vehicle foam restraints from Demolition Man will never come to market. So, maybe choose a seatbelt over kissing the windscreen?

                                  And, yes, it is a checkbox in preflight. Nice to hear it in a pilot's instructions to passengers. Better when they actually check and refuse to move until compliance.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • f4grx@chaos.socialF f4grx@chaos.social

                                    @GossiTheDog but yeah, php is a bad language and we should get rid of it.

                                    number6@fosstodon.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    number6@fosstodon.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    number6@fosstodon.org
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #200

                                    @f4grx @GossiTheDog

                                    Nextcloud, which is often touted as an European alternative to Google services, runs using PHP.

                                    It doesn't seem like PHP is going away any time soon.

                                    f4grx@chaos.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • stuart@social.sydenham.org.ukS stuart@social.sydenham.org.uk

                                      @f4grx @GossiTheDog

                                      That's really Matt Mullenweg's decision. I'm not holding my breath.

                                      fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.net
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #201

                                      @stuart @f4grx @GossiTheDog I’m sure Mullenweg will be happy to fund the PHP Foundation given his strong denunciation of freeloading by WP-Engine /s

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • gbargoud@masto.nycG gbargoud@masto.nyc

                                        @GossiTheDog

                                        So what Meta (who famously [edit: used to] use PHP extensively in what used to be their flagship product) spent on the complete failure that was the metaverse (~$60 billion) could have funded them at current levels for close to 100,000 years

                                        fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.net
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #202

                                        @gbargoud @GossiTheDog Meta no longer uses PHP, they use their own reimplementation called Hack:

                                        https://hacklang.org/

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • number6@fosstodon.orgN number6@fosstodon.org

                                          @f4grx @GossiTheDog

                                          Nextcloud, which is often touted as an European alternative to Google services, runs using PHP.

                                          It doesn't seem like PHP is going away any time soon.

                                          f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          f4grx@chaos.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #203

                                          @number6 @GossiTheDog I have zero doubt about that. I was ironic. I run several nextcloud instances and it's pretty good.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper