Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
renewablesgreenenergy
30 Indlæg 16 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ar387@mstdn.socialA ar387@mstdn.social

    For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

    "The analysis found a total 99.9% material recovery – calculating that 79.5% of the wind farm’s components were recycled and 20.4% were reused or retained as spare parts, keeping nearly all material out of landfills."

    100% of the recycling and component retention took place in the UK, supporting domestic green jobs and at least 10 supply chain companies.

    https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/uk-first-sees-decommissioning-of-scottishpower-wind-farm-demonstrate-turbine-circularity-01-09-2026/

    #renewables #greenenergy

    aetios@sns.minovsky.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
    aetios@sns.minovsky.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
    aetios@sns.minovsky.space
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #4
    @ar387 Just last week i was talking about this with someone and I said I suspected the non recyclability to be a myth at best, misinformation at worst. This seems to confirm that, thanks for pointing out.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ar387@mstdn.socialA ar387@mstdn.social

      For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

      "The analysis found a total 99.9% material recovery – calculating that 79.5% of the wind farm’s components were recycled and 20.4% were reused or retained as spare parts, keeping nearly all material out of landfills."

      100% of the recycling and component retention took place in the UK, supporting domestic green jobs and at least 10 supply chain companies.

      https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/uk-first-sees-decommissioning-of-scottishpower-wind-farm-demonstrate-turbine-circularity-01-09-2026/

      #renewables #greenenergy

      rania@freesewing.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      rania@freesewing.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      rania@freesewing.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #5

      @ar387
      I’m Rania from Gaza 💔
      We lost our home, and now my children and I are living in a fragile tent with no protection from the cold, heat, or insects.
      My children suffer every day, and I am unable to provide their basic needs 💔
      Please don’t leave us alone. Any donation or share could help us survive 🙏🤍
      🔗 Help & donation link in bio.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ar387@mstdn.socialA ar387@mstdn.social

        For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

        "The analysis found a total 99.9% material recovery – calculating that 79.5% of the wind farm’s components were recycled and 20.4% were reused or retained as spare parts, keeping nearly all material out of landfills."

        100% of the recycling and component retention took place in the UK, supporting domestic green jobs and at least 10 supply chain companies.

        https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/uk-first-sees-decommissioning-of-scottishpower-wind-farm-demonstrate-turbine-circularity-01-09-2026/

        #renewables #greenenergy

        schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
        schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
        schnedan@social.tchncs.de
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #6

        @ar387 What UK is doing with the glasfiber in the rotors, which is normally not recyclable and can only be burned in specialized facilities with ultra high temperatures

        radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ar387@mstdn.socialA ar387@mstdn.social

          For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

          "The analysis found a total 99.9% material recovery – calculating that 79.5% of the wind farm’s components were recycled and 20.4% were reused or retained as spare parts, keeping nearly all material out of landfills."

          100% of the recycling and component retention took place in the UK, supporting domestic green jobs and at least 10 supply chain companies.

          https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/uk-first-sees-decommissioning-of-scottishpower-wind-farm-demonstrate-turbine-circularity-01-09-2026/

          #renewables #greenenergy

          emeb@society.oftrolls.comE This user is from outside of this forum
          emeb@society.oftrolls.comE This user is from outside of this forum
          emeb@society.oftrolls.com
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #7

          @ar387 I was particularly interested in how they were recycling the old turbine blades. Here in the US we've seen so many reports of the blades just ending up in landfills because the composites are so difficult to handle. Looks like Plaswire has an innovative approach that should stand as an example to others.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ar387@mstdn.socialA ar387@mstdn.social

            For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

            "The analysis found a total 99.9% material recovery – calculating that 79.5% of the wind farm’s components were recycled and 20.4% were reused or retained as spare parts, keeping nearly all material out of landfills."

            100% of the recycling and component retention took place in the UK, supporting domestic green jobs and at least 10 supply chain companies.

            https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/uk-first-sees-decommissioning-of-scottishpower-wind-farm-demonstrate-turbine-circularity-01-09-2026/

            #renewables #greenenergy

            evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
            evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
            evoscale@c.im
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #8

            @ar387 Interesting.

            I was informed by an associate in the field, that more goes into reprocessing the blades, than the actual benefit over competing clean energy metrics.

            Then again, how many of the principals are supplying accurate data, and to whom?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ar387@mstdn.socialA ar387@mstdn.social

              For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

              "The analysis found a total 99.9% material recovery – calculating that 79.5% of the wind farm’s components were recycled and 20.4% were reused or retained as spare parts, keeping nearly all material out of landfills."

              100% of the recycling and component retention took place in the UK, supporting domestic green jobs and at least 10 supply chain companies.

              https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/uk-first-sees-decommissioning-of-scottishpower-wind-farm-demonstrate-turbine-circularity-01-09-2026/

              #renewables #greenenergy

              bricker@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
              bricker@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
              bricker@fosstodon.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #9

              @ar387 a canal restoration project in England just installed Lock Gates made from up-cycled end-of-life Dutch wind turbine blade(s).

              ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ar387@mstdn.socialA ar387@mstdn.social

                For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

                "The analysis found a total 99.9% material recovery – calculating that 79.5% of the wind farm’s components were recycled and 20.4% were reused or retained as spare parts, keeping nearly all material out of landfills."

                100% of the recycling and component retention took place in the UK, supporting domestic green jobs and at least 10 supply chain companies.

                https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/uk-first-sees-decommissioning-of-scottishpower-wind-farm-demonstrate-turbine-circularity-01-09-2026/

                #renewables #greenenergy

                radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                radicalabacus@hachyderm.io
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #10

                @ar387 this is great news 🙂 I can't help chuckling at "turbine circularity" - like, that's obvious if you watch them for 5 minutes

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • schnedan@social.tchncs.deS schnedan@social.tchncs.de

                  @ar387 What UK is doing with the glasfiber in the rotors, which is normally not recyclable and can only be burned in specialized facilities with ultra high temperatures

                  radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                  radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                  radicalabacus@hachyderm.io
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #11

                  @schnedan @ar387 the article mentions they're shredded and used to make RX Polymer, used to replace other construction materials for fencing, drainage components etc. Not completely circular recycling, but better than landfill or incineration

                  geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG rard@mastodon.nlR 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • ar387@mstdn.socialA ar387@mstdn.social

                    For those that keep saying wind turbines can't be reused or recycled need to read this

                    "The analysis found a total 99.9% material recovery – calculating that 79.5% of the wind farm’s components were recycled and 20.4% were reused or retained as spare parts, keeping nearly all material out of landfills."

                    100% of the recycling and component retention took place in the UK, supporting domestic green jobs and at least 10 supply chain companies.

                    https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/uk-first-sees-decommissioning-of-scottishpower-wind-farm-demonstrate-turbine-circularity-01-09-2026/

                    #renewables #greenenergy

                    woo@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                    woo@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                    woo@fosstodon.org
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #12

                    @ar387 It makes you wonder who has been spreading lies. I'd note, for comparison, that neither gas nor coal can be recycled, though I believe wood ash is a useful waste product.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR radicalabacus@hachyderm.io

                      @schnedan @ar387 the article mentions they're shredded and used to make RX Polymer, used to replace other construction materials for fencing, drainage components etc. Not completely circular recycling, but better than landfill or incineration

                      geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                      geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                      geoffl@mastodon.me.uk
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #13

                      @radicalabacus @schnedan @ar387

                      It just delays the inceneration/landfill step. There are currently 33000 blades in the UK to replace and we need better solutions than shredding them to mix with even more plastic. It looks nice in the headlines, which is the main reason for doing it, but we're creating an even more difficult recycling problem for the future.

                      radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR landa@graz.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR radicalabacus@hachyderm.io

                        @schnedan @ar387 the article mentions they're shredded and used to make RX Polymer, used to replace other construction materials for fencing, drainage components etc. Not completely circular recycling, but better than landfill or incineration

                        rard@mastodon.nlR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rard@mastodon.nlR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rard@mastodon.nl
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #14

                        @radicalabacus @schnedan @ar387 Will the new products with RX Polymer end up in a landfill after use? How to make sure that the material is separated from plastics that can be recycled?

                        radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR schnedan@social.tchncs.deS 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG geoffl@mastodon.me.uk

                          @radicalabacus @schnedan @ar387

                          It just delays the inceneration/landfill step. There are currently 33000 blades in the UK to replace and we need better solutions than shredding them to mix with even more plastic. It looks nice in the headlines, which is the main reason for doing it, but we're creating an even more difficult recycling problem for the future.

                          radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                          radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                          radicalabacus@hachyderm.io
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #15

                          @geoffl @schnedan @ar387 reusing the material once helps, and maybe it can be processed and used again in some way - but a material/process that could be a bit more fully circular would be an improvement. Power stations all produce waste though, so I don't want to be too hard on wind turbines here

                          schnedan@social.tchncs.deS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • rard@mastodon.nlR rard@mastodon.nl

                            @radicalabacus @schnedan @ar387 Will the new products with RX Polymer end up in a landfill after use? How to make sure that the material is separated from plastics that can be recycled?

                            radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                            radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                            radicalabacus@hachyderm.io
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #16

                            @rard @schnedan @ar387 I don't know; maybe RX Polymer can be recycled at least a couple more times (but I'm just speculating, and that still sends it to landfill/incineration eventually). I'd love to see turbine blades that could be more circularly recycled or even composted, but I suspect that only works for small turbines

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR radicalabacus@hachyderm.io

                              @geoffl @schnedan @ar387 reusing the material once helps, and maybe it can be processed and used again in some way - but a material/process that could be a bit more fully circular would be an improvement. Power stations all produce waste though, so I don't want to be too hard on wind turbines here

                              schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                              schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                              schnedan@social.tchncs.de
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #17

                              @radicalabacus @geoffl @ar387 "but a material/process that could be a bit more fully circular would be an improvement."

                              Yes but so far that means: less stability, more weight, less efficiency, more cost.

                              Then you can use materials which allow full recycling.

                              In Germany the press said: you can't made this much railway sleepers or park benches. At least you need to burn these materials. And in Germany - to my knowledge - there is only one plant which can burn glasfiber - and it's way to small to process the amounts comming.

                              geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • rard@mastodon.nlR rard@mastodon.nl

                                @radicalabacus @schnedan @ar387 Will the new products with RX Polymer end up in a landfill after use? How to make sure that the material is separated from plastics that can be recycled?

                                schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                                schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                                schnedan@social.tchncs.de
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #18

                                @rard @radicalabacus @ar387 "How to make sure that the material is separated from plastics that can be recycled?"

                                Doubt it's possible

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • schnedan@social.tchncs.deS schnedan@social.tchncs.de

                                  @radicalabacus @geoffl @ar387 "but a material/process that could be a bit more fully circular would be an improvement."

                                  Yes but so far that means: less stability, more weight, less efficiency, more cost.

                                  Then you can use materials which allow full recycling.

                                  In Germany the press said: you can't made this much railway sleepers or park benches. At least you need to burn these materials. And in Germany - to my knowledge - there is only one plant which can burn glasfiber - and it's way to small to process the amounts comming.

                                  geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  geoffl@mastodon.me.uk
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #19

                                  @schnedan @radicalabacus @ar387

                                  I can't find products made from "Plaswire's smart RX Polymer" for sale anywhere, it looks like more greenwashing. Last year Plaswire were jumping on the blockchain bandwagon.

                                  https://www.newsletter.co.uk/business/lurgan-recycling-innovator-pioneers-world-first-blockchain-system-to-trace-recycled-wind-turbine-bladesfor-the-first-time-we-can-provide-complete-transparency-5401812

                                  radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR schnedan@social.tchncs.deS 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • schnedan@social.tchncs.deS schnedan@social.tchncs.de

                                    @radicalabacus @geoffl @ar387 "but a material/process that could be a bit more fully circular would be an improvement."

                                    Yes but so far that means: less stability, more weight, less efficiency, more cost.

                                    Then you can use materials which allow full recycling.

                                    In Germany the press said: you can't made this much railway sleepers or park benches. At least you need to burn these materials. And in Germany - to my knowledge - there is only one plant which can burn glasfiber - and it's way to small to process the amounts comming.

                                    radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    radicalabacus@hachyderm.io
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #20

                                    @schnedan @geoffl @ar387 I guess the practical problems to solve are finding uses for RX Polymer and finding better turbine blade materials. No large power generation company is going to want to lose efficiency/profit. I'd rather power generation was not for profit but I'd rather they add wind generation capacity than gas or coal. Maybe they could be encouraged to use more recyclable materials through taxation it their current concern is lower profit?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG geoffl@mastodon.me.uk

                                      @schnedan @radicalabacus @ar387

                                      I can't find products made from "Plaswire's smart RX Polymer" for sale anywhere, it looks like more greenwashing. Last year Plaswire were jumping on the blockchain bandwagon.

                                      https://www.newsletter.co.uk/business/lurgan-recycling-innovator-pioneers-world-first-blockchain-system-to-trace-recycled-wind-turbine-bladesfor-the-first-time-we-can-provide-complete-transparency-5401812

                                      radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      radicalabacus@hachyderm.io
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #21

                                      @geoffl @schnedan @ar387 ew, that's awful. And it's not like blockchain's reputation wasn't already terrible at the time. Blockchain doesn't necessarily imply some sort of wasteful proof of work based cryptocurrency nonsense but it's also 100% not necessary just to keep track of blades and materials

                                      schnedan@social.tchncs.deS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG geoffl@mastodon.me.uk

                                        @schnedan @radicalabacus @ar387

                                        I can't find products made from "Plaswire's smart RX Polymer" for sale anywhere, it looks like more greenwashing. Last year Plaswire were jumping on the blockchain bandwagon.

                                        https://www.newsletter.co.uk/business/lurgan-recycling-innovator-pioneers-world-first-blockchain-system-to-trace-recycled-wind-turbine-bladesfor-the-first-time-we-can-provide-complete-transparency-5401812

                                        schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        schnedan@social.tchncs.de
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #22

                                        @geoffl @radicalabacus @ar387 don't know if these actual use recycling materials from blades, but these are products which can.

                                        they can cope with some degree of impurities and need fair amounts of material:

                                        https://meiller-umwelttechnik.de/produkt-kategorie/aussenanlagen-stadtmobiliar/parkbank-tisch-sitzgruppen/parkbank/parkbank-aus-kunststoff/

                                        https://www.relux-umwelt.de/leistungen/bahnschwellen/
                                        https://pioonier.com/kunststoff-bahnschwellen/

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR radicalabacus@hachyderm.io

                                          @geoffl @schnedan @ar387 ew, that's awful. And it's not like blockchain's reputation wasn't already terrible at the time. Blockchain doesn't necessarily imply some sort of wasteful proof of work based cryptocurrency nonsense but it's also 100% not necessary just to keep track of blades and materials

                                          schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          schnedan@social.tchncs.de
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #23

                                          @radicalabacus @geoffl @ar387 you don't need blockchains... just some international standard signs

                                          there is no english version, but this page lists plastic variant markings.

                                          https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurzzeichen_(Kunststoff)

                                          e.g. GF: glasfaserverstärkt (engl. glass fibre)

                                          you can include the markings in the mold, laser em,... it will last a long time.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper