Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. BBC out shilling for the anti-demonstration, anti-protest government again this morning.

BBC out shilling for the anti-demonstration, anti-protest government again this morning.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
6 Indlæg 6 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • kneewax@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
    kneewax@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
    kneewax@fosstodon.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    BBC out shilling for the anti-demonstration, anti-protest government again this morning.

    Apparently it cost taxpayers £150K to remove Banksy works from public buildings.

    A few things spring to mind:

    1) The street value of these works would have far eclipsed the cost of removing them.

    2) Banksy is recognised enough now to argue removing his vandalism is vandalism in its self.

    3) Funny how it's our money now, but not when it being used to aid genocide.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2vnny7j5zo

    rogerbw@discordian.socialR fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF randamumaki@mstdn.socialR dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD ginevracat@toot.communityG 5 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • kneewax@fosstodon.orgK kneewax@fosstodon.org

      BBC out shilling for the anti-demonstration, anti-protest government again this morning.

      Apparently it cost taxpayers £150K to remove Banksy works from public buildings.

      A few things spring to mind:

      1) The street value of these works would have far eclipsed the cost of removing them.

      2) Banksy is recognised enough now to argue removing his vandalism is vandalism in its self.

      3) Funny how it's our money now, but not when it being used to aid genocide.

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2vnny7j5zo

      rogerbw@discordian.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      rogerbw@discordian.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      rogerbw@discordian.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @Kneewax 4) Anyone charging £150,000 to clean a wall should be prosecuted for fraud. Also whoever approved the contract. It would cost less to build a new one.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • kneewax@fosstodon.orgK kneewax@fosstodon.org

        BBC out shilling for the anti-demonstration, anti-protest government again this morning.

        Apparently it cost taxpayers £150K to remove Banksy works from public buildings.

        A few things spring to mind:

        1) The street value of these works would have far eclipsed the cost of removing them.

        2) Banksy is recognised enough now to argue removing his vandalism is vandalism in its self.

        3) Funny how it's our money now, but not when it being used to aid genocide.

        https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2vnny7j5zo

        fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
        fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
        fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.uk
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @Kneewax guardian, too

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • kneewax@fosstodon.orgK kneewax@fosstodon.org

          BBC out shilling for the anti-demonstration, anti-protest government again this morning.

          Apparently it cost taxpayers £150K to remove Banksy works from public buildings.

          A few things spring to mind:

          1) The street value of these works would have far eclipsed the cost of removing them.

          2) Banksy is recognised enough now to argue removing his vandalism is vandalism in its self.

          3) Funny how it's our money now, but not when it being used to aid genocide.

          https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2vnny7j5zo

          randamumaki@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          randamumaki@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          randamumaki@mstdn.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @Kneewax Art is priceless.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kneewax@fosstodon.orgK kneewax@fosstodon.org

            BBC out shilling for the anti-demonstration, anti-protest government again this morning.

            Apparently it cost taxpayers £150K to remove Banksy works from public buildings.

            A few things spring to mind:

            1) The street value of these works would have far eclipsed the cost of removing them.

            2) Banksy is recognised enough now to argue removing his vandalism is vandalism in its self.

            3) Funny how it's our money now, but not when it being used to aid genocide.

            https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2vnny7j5zo

            dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianea@lgbtqia.space
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @Kneewax

            That is a historic work of art and should be protected.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • kneewax@fosstodon.orgK kneewax@fosstodon.org

              BBC out shilling for the anti-demonstration, anti-protest government again this morning.

              Apparently it cost taxpayers £150K to remove Banksy works from public buildings.

              A few things spring to mind:

              1) The street value of these works would have far eclipsed the cost of removing them.

              2) Banksy is recognised enough now to argue removing his vandalism is vandalism in its self.

              3) Funny how it's our money now, but not when it being used to aid genocide.

              https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2vnny7j5zo

              ginevracat@toot.communityG This user is from outside of this forum
              ginevracat@toot.communityG This user is from outside of this forum
              ginevracat@toot.community
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @Kneewax @quixoticgeek Remove it? They should have sold tickets. Fucking troglodytes.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
              Svar
              • Svar som emne
              Login for at svare
              • Ældste til nyeste
              • Nyeste til ældste
              • Most Votes


              • Log ind

              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

              • Login or register to search.
              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              Graciously hosted by data.coop
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Hjem
              • Seneste
              • Etiketter
              • Populære
              • Verden
              • Bruger
              • Grupper