Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. If a human hacker was caught doing close, they'd be inside for years, & AFK.

If a human hacker was caught doing close, they'd be inside for years, & AFK.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
21 Indlæg 17 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

    If a human hacker was caught doing close, they'd be inside for years, & AFK. Meanwhile, OpenAI gets to make everyone's infra their sandpit, & when damage is done, ride a 'look at the monster we made' investor gush.

    "The AI agents uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to RubyGems on ‌11 May, according to a group of researchers who posted their findings online on Friday, saying they believed “these were authored by internal OpenAI agents”.

    OpenAI then confirmed it.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

    bebadefabo@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    bebadefabo@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    bebadefabo@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #9

    @JulianOliver Charles Manson went to prison for the actions of his agents. I see no difference here. Lock them up

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

      If a human hacker was caught doing close, they'd be inside for years, & AFK. Meanwhile, OpenAI gets to make everyone's infra their sandpit, & when damage is done, ride a 'look at the monster we made' investor gush.

      "The AI agents uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to RubyGems on ‌11 May, according to a group of researchers who posted their findings online on Friday, saying they believed “these were authored by internal OpenAI agents”.

      OpenAI then confirmed it.

      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

      chrisg@kolektiva.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      chrisg@kolektiva.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      chrisg@kolektiva.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #10

      @JulianOliver Regardless of whether it was their explicit intention or not, a significant signal sent here is the effectiveness of these systems at laundering responsibility.

      They successfully showed (once again) that you can do illegal shit and get away with it as long as you claim that the machine did it. Specifically, that their machine did it.

      This is a sales demo.

      airshipper@cloudisland.nzA lieschenrelleum@kolektiva.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

        If a human hacker was caught doing close, they'd be inside for years, & AFK. Meanwhile, OpenAI gets to make everyone's infra their sandpit, & when damage is done, ride a 'look at the monster we made' investor gush.

        "The AI agents uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to RubyGems on ‌11 May, according to a group of researchers who posted their findings online on Friday, saying they believed “these were authored by internal OpenAI agents”.

        OpenAI then confirmed it.

        https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

        schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        schrotthaufen@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        schrotthaufen@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #11

        @JulianOliver @blogdiva Been saying it since the huggingface story broke: Those assholes need to be prosecuted under CFAA. With the Morris Worm verdict, there’s precedent. Lock em up for a couple of decades.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
        • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

          If a human hacker was caught doing close, they'd be inside for years, & AFK. Meanwhile, OpenAI gets to make everyone's infra their sandpit, & when damage is done, ride a 'look at the monster we made' investor gush.

          "The AI agents uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to RubyGems on ‌11 May, according to a group of researchers who posted their findings online on Friday, saying they believed “these were authored by internal OpenAI agents”.

          OpenAI then confirmed it.

          https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

          puretaste@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
          puretaste@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
          puretaste@mastodon.world
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #12

          @JulianOliver It's because they're allowed to pretend it's all "autonomous actions" with no causal link to their own actions, instead of the reality that they willfully and specifically programmed their computers to do these things (and then proceeded to not properly sandbox or supervise the processes). You don't get this kind of text prediction without deliberate model calibration after the initial "ingest the entire web" round (or perhaps also some corpus curation for the first rounds).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

            If a human hacker was caught doing close, they'd be inside for years, & AFK. Meanwhile, OpenAI gets to make everyone's infra their sandpit, & when damage is done, ride a 'look at the monster we made' investor gush.

            "The AI agents uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to RubyGems on ‌11 May, according to a group of researchers who posted their findings online on Friday, saying they believed “these were authored by internal OpenAI agents”.

            OpenAI then confirmed it.

            https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

            nigel@littleone.littlefedi.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            nigel@littleone.littlefedi.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            nigel@littleone.littlefedi.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #13

            @JulianOliver@mastodon.social lock them all up. They know exactly what they’re doing.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • chrisg@kolektiva.socialC chrisg@kolektiva.social

              @JulianOliver Regardless of whether it was their explicit intention or not, a significant signal sent here is the effectiveness of these systems at laundering responsibility.

              They successfully showed (once again) that you can do illegal shit and get away with it as long as you claim that the machine did it. Specifically, that their machine did it.

              This is a sales demo.

              airshipper@cloudisland.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
              airshipper@cloudisland.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
              airshipper@cloudisland.nz
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #14

              @chrisg @JulianOliver exactly. no agent woke up and did that on its own, or in response to someone's prompt for a powerpoint illustration

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • chrisg@kolektiva.socialC chrisg@kolektiva.social

                @JulianOliver Regardless of whether it was their explicit intention or not, a significant signal sent here is the effectiveness of these systems at laundering responsibility.

                They successfully showed (once again) that you can do illegal shit and get away with it as long as you claim that the machine did it. Specifically, that their machine did it.

                This is a sales demo.

                lieschenrelleum@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                lieschenrelleum@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                lieschenrelleum@kolektiva.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #15

                @chrisg @JulianOliver that was my first thought too

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

                  These corporations get to enjoy the legal protections of a 'juridical person', yet when they mess with the rights of actual people, they don't suffer the accountabilities and due process we people do. The same old vampiric & classist exceptionalism, but now with trollface.

                  wronglang@bayes.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wronglang@bayes.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
                  wronglang@bayes.club
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #16

                  @JulianOliver we could fix that...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

                    These corporations get to enjoy the legal protections of a 'juridical person', yet when they mess with the rights of actual people, they don't suffer the accountabilities and due process we people do. The same old vampiric & classist exceptionalism, but now with trollface.

                    raymierussell@mastodon.scotR This user is from outside of this forum
                    raymierussell@mastodon.scotR This user is from outside of this forum
                    raymierussell@mastodon.scot
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #17

                    @JulianOliver

                    Yup, the idea of Limited Liability as a necessary evil on a pragmatic basis has morphed into Corporations are people but with more rights than normal folk. We must all bow down to the mythical shareholder value as the ultimate "good".

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

                      If a human hacker was caught doing close, they'd be inside for years, & AFK. Meanwhile, OpenAI gets to make everyone's infra their sandpit, & when damage is done, ride a 'look at the monster we made' investor gush.

                      "The AI agents uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to RubyGems on ‌11 May, according to a group of researchers who posted their findings online on Friday, saying they believed “these were authored by internal OpenAI agents”.

                      OpenAI then confirmed it.

                      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                      pt_ickle@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pt_ickle@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pt_ickle@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #18

                      @JulianOliver 😶‍🌫️

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

                        If a human hacker was caught doing close, they'd be inside for years, & AFK. Meanwhile, OpenAI gets to make everyone's infra their sandpit, & when damage is done, ride a 'look at the monster we made' investor gush.

                        "The AI agents uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to RubyGems on ‌11 May, according to a group of researchers who posted their findings online on Friday, saying they believed “these were authored by internal OpenAI agents”.

                        OpenAI then confirmed it.

                        https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #19

                        @JulianOliver

                        Seems like these days there are two option options for the criminally minded.

                        Go into government or start an AI company

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

                          @scott Indeed, a good point and perhaps even basis for a civil lawsuit, and/or some regulation with actual teeth.

                          albertojavier@universeodon.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                          albertojavier@universeodon.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                          albertojavier@universeodon.com
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #20

                          @JulianOliver @scott maybe time for a "counter-terrorism" unit?...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ julianoliver@mastodon.social

                            These corporations get to enjoy the legal protections of a 'juridical person', yet when they mess with the rights of actual people, they don't suffer the accountabilities and due process we people do. The same old vampiric & classist exceptionalism, but now with trollface.

                            julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            julianoliver@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            julianoliver@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #21

                            AI gone rogue is the digital equivalent of arson. You set the fire, you should pay for what is burned, wherever it is burned.

                            These companies need to be punished and contained when they do harm. Just as we would any roaming, violent psychopath in the population.

                            https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/1551084/openai-hacked-medicare-portal-australia-prime-minister-anthony-albanese-says

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            Svar
                            • Svar som emne
                            Login for at svare
                            • Ældste til nyeste
                            • Nyeste til ældste
                            • Most Votes


                            • Log ind

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            Graciously hosted by data.coop
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Hjem
                            • Seneste
                            • Etiketter
                            • Populære
                            • Verden
                            • Bruger
                            • Grupper