Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. #BREAKING:

#BREAKING:

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
breakingtrump
11 Indlæg 6 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • gottalaff@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gottalaff@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gottalaff@mstdn.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    #BREAKING:

    “Judge James Boasberg has found probable cause that the #Trump administration acted in contempt of court when officials last month defied his order to turn two planes around carrying alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador.

    "Court ult determines that the Government’s actions on that day demonstrate a willful disregard for its Order, sufficient for the Court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the Govt in criminal contempt”

    https://thereport.be/article/?app=breaking&u=https%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.link%2FaRYR2oW

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gottalaff@mstdn.socialG gottalaff@mstdn.social

      #BREAKING:

      “Judge James Boasberg has found probable cause that the #Trump administration acted in contempt of court when officials last month defied his order to turn two planes around carrying alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador.

      "Court ult determines that the Government’s actions on that day demonstrate a willful disregard for its Order, sufficient for the Court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the Govt in criminal contempt”

      https://thereport.be/article/?app=breaking&u=https%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.link%2FaRYR2oW

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Gæst
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @GottaLaff great...what is the consequence? That's the problem. I am jailed he gets a meh.

      gottalaff@mstdn.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Gæst

        @GottaLaff great...what is the consequence? That's the problem. I am jailed he gets a meh.

        gottalaff@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gottalaff@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gottalaff@mstdn.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @debrashannon My god, take the win.

        Klasfeld:

        Judge Boasberg will give the government an opportunity to "purge such contempt."

        "If they opt not to do so, the Court will proceed to identify the contemnor(s) and refer the matter for prosecution."

        ? mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • gottalaff@mstdn.socialG gottalaff@mstdn.social

          @debrashannon My god, take the win.

          Klasfeld:

          Judge Boasberg will give the government an opportunity to "purge such contempt."

          "If they opt not to do so, the Court will proceed to identify the contemnor(s) and refer the matter for prosecution."

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Gæst
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @GottaLaff but without a consequence the win goes to another court and they dismiss it. That has been a continual problem. Without that it happens over and over.

          ? 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gottalaff@mstdn.socialG gottalaff@mstdn.social

            @debrashannon My god, take the win.

            Klasfeld:

            Judge Boasberg will give the government an opportunity to "purge such contempt."

            "If they opt not to do so, the Court will proceed to identify the contemnor(s) and refer the matter for prosecution."

            mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
            mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
            mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @GottaLaff @debrashannon

            💯!!! There has been a lot of bad news lately and there will be more in the future. We are in the midst of a long struggle and it will not be over anytime soon. But, let's take a war analogy. If you sent a platoon out to destroy a strategic bridge and they come back having completed their mission, you don't complain that the enemy is just going to cross the river somewhere else. You congratulate them, and put your heads together on how to win the next skirmish.

            suneauken@mastodon.worldS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • suneauken@mastodon.worldS suneauken@mastodon.world shared this topic
            • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

              @GottaLaff @debrashannon

              💯!!! There has been a lot of bad news lately and there will be more in the future. We are in the midst of a long struggle and it will not be over anytime soon. But, let's take a war analogy. If you sent a platoon out to destroy a strategic bridge and they come back having completed their mission, you don't complain that the enemy is just going to cross the river somewhere else. You congratulate them, and put your heads together on how to win the next skirmish.

              suneauken@mastodon.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
              suneauken@mastodon.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
              suneauken@mastodon.world
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @mastodonmigration @GottaLaff @debrashannon

              This and then this again.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Gæst

                @GottaLaff but without a consequence the win goes to another court and they dismiss it. That has been a continual problem. Without that it happens over and over.

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Gæst
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @debrashannon @GottaLaff
                This is a first step to actual consequences happening, and by judicial standards it will be happening very quickly. The government is going to be prosecuted by the court, because a judge already has substantial evidence that a crime was committed.

                This is part of the system working as it should to protect the rights of people in the US. And it's how we stop the export of random immigrants to foreign prisons. That is massively important.

                The fight still might be lost at a later stage, but this is the first step of that not happening. And even corrupt members of the Supreme Court have been reluctant to abrogate judicial authority, and are actively defending judges who get threatened by the Trump administration.

                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Gæst

                  @debrashannon @GottaLaff
                  This is a first step to actual consequences happening, and by judicial standards it will be happening very quickly. The government is going to be prosecuted by the court, because a judge already has substantial evidence that a crime was committed.

                  This is part of the system working as it should to protect the rights of people in the US. And it's how we stop the export of random immigrants to foreign prisons. That is massively important.

                  The fight still might be lost at a later stage, but this is the first step of that not happening. And even corrupt members of the Supreme Court have been reluctant to abrogate judicial authority, and are actively defending judges who get threatened by the Trump administration.

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Gæst
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  @me_valentijn @debrashannon @GottaLaff Even *WITH* an appointed attorney, this becomes a Federal criminal prosecution, for which the President has unilateral power to pardon anyone charged or convicted. It's an illusory "win" that has almost zero likelihood of leading anywhere.

                  We keep ascribing importance to impotent findings and rulings like this. That's not helping anyone or anything except to make someone feel good about something that's not really there.

                  gottalaff@mstdn.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Gæst

                    @me_valentijn @debrashannon @GottaLaff Even *WITH* an appointed attorney, this becomes a Federal criminal prosecution, for which the President has unilateral power to pardon anyone charged or convicted. It's an illusory "win" that has almost zero likelihood of leading anywhere.

                    We keep ascribing importance to impotent findings and rulings like this. That's not helping anyone or anything except to make someone feel good about something that's not really there.

                    gottalaff@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gottalaff@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gottalaff@mstdn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9

                    @snarky I couldn't disagree more.

                    Each win spotlights and weakens, encourages more protests, I could go on.

                    Trump wasn't jailed, but he is a convicted felon 34x over. That isn't nothing.

                    "Feeling good about something" is what gives people the will to keep going and to keep up the pressure. Pressure works.

                    @me_valentijn @debrashannon

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gottalaff@mstdn.socialG gottalaff@mstdn.social

                      @snarky I couldn't disagree more.

                      Each win spotlights and weakens, encourages more protests, I could go on.

                      Trump wasn't jailed, but he is a convicted felon 34x over. That isn't nothing.

                      "Feeling good about something" is what gives people the will to keep going and to keep up the pressure. Pressure works.

                      @me_valentijn @debrashannon

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Gæst
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #10

                      @GottaLaff @me_valentijn @debrashannon

                      Back in law school, it was hammered into our heads that without a remedy, there is no actual legal wrong.

                      Trump was convicted -- so what? He didn't go to jail and still won the election. No consequence = no progress. If anything, that further degrades confidence in the system.

                      I appreciate that you want to see and present the silver lining in every piece of good news, that's fine. That's your thing.

                      gottalaff@mstdn.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Gæst

                        @GottaLaff @me_valentijn @debrashannon

                        Back in law school, it was hammered into our heads that without a remedy, there is no actual legal wrong.

                        Trump was convicted -- so what? He didn't go to jail and still won the election. No consequence = no progress. If anything, that further degrades confidence in the system.

                        I appreciate that you want to see and present the silver lining in every piece of good news, that's fine. That's your thing.

                        gottalaff@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gottalaff@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gottalaff@mstdn.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #11

                        @snarky It's not
                        "my thing," it's simply truth. There is good news in each of these. I guess YOUR thing is to doom and whine and refuse to acknowledge that.

                        The convictions were meaningful, despite no prison time, as I said.

                        Each good ruling helps, not just legally, and I've explained how in post after post, year after year.,

                        You're part of the problem. Your negativity suppresses confidence & enthusiasm to keep pressuring/protesting.

                        Bite me.

                        #Toodles

                        @me_valentijn @debrashannon

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper