Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Cowboy space's application for stupidly ridiculous numbers of ludicrously large and probably impossible orbital "AI data centers" was SO BAD that the FCC asked them for loads of info.

Cowboy space's application for stupidly ridiculous numbers of ludicrously large and probably impossible orbital "AI data centers" was SO BAD that the FCC asked them for loads of info.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
30 Indlæg 19 Posters 5 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    Cowboy space's application for stupidly ridiculous numbers of ludicrously large and probably impossible orbital "AI data centers" was SO BAD that the FCC asked them for loads of info. Which apparently they didn't provide by the deadline. Shucks. https://satnews.com/2026/09/13/the-fcc-asked-cowboy-space-how-big-its-satellites-are/

    (Too bad 4 other companies have done the same fucking thing and the FCC hasn't stopped them)

    johntimaeus@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    johntimaeus@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    johntimaeus@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #7

    @sundogplanets

    Applications are free?
    Applications like this should have fees that offset the cost of research and processing.

    Maybe $1 per kilo per 100 km orbital destination.

    So a one ton satellite in 700km orbit costs $7000 each in application fee.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      Cowboy space's application for stupidly ridiculous numbers of ludicrously large and probably impossible orbital "AI data centers" was SO BAD that the FCC asked them for loads of info. Which apparently they didn't provide by the deadline. Shucks. https://satnews.com/2026/09/13/the-fcc-asked-cowboy-space-how-big-its-satellites-are/

      (Too bad 4 other companies have done the same fucking thing and the FCC hasn't stopped them)

      slacy@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      slacy@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      slacy@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #8

      @sundogplanets can we also please start talking about how *totally fucking absurd* a "Mars Colony" is as a general idea? Hey, who wants to live in an underground cave for the rest of your life?

      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • slacy@mastodon.socialS slacy@mastodon.social

        @sundogplanets can we also please start talking about how *totally fucking absurd* a "Mars Colony" is as a general idea? Hey, who wants to live in an underground cave for the rest of your life?

        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sundogplanets@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #9

        @slacy I have been, and I will continue to! You should read "A City on Mars" you would like it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          Cowboy space's application for stupidly ridiculous numbers of ludicrously large and probably impossible orbital "AI data centers" was SO BAD that the FCC asked them for loads of info. Which apparently they didn't provide by the deadline. Shucks. https://satnews.com/2026/09/13/the-fcc-asked-cowboy-space-how-big-its-satellites-are/

          (Too bad 4 other companies have done the same fucking thing and the FCC hasn't stopped them)

          whitecattamer@mastodon.onlineW This user is from outside of this forum
          whitecattamer@mastodon.onlineW This user is from outside of this forum
          whitecattamer@mastodon.online
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #10

          @sundogplanets …they’re trying to make more of the Bullshit Machines and they got knocked out by the clock instead of submitting bullshit?

          SURELY THIS ISN’T INDICATIVE OF ANYTHING

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            Cowboy space's application for stupidly ridiculous numbers of ludicrously large and probably impossible orbital "AI data centers" was SO BAD that the FCC asked them for loads of info. Which apparently they didn't provide by the deadline. Shucks. https://satnews.com/2026/09/13/the-fcc-asked-cowboy-space-how-big-its-satellites-are/

            (Too bad 4 other companies have done the same fucking thing and the FCC hasn't stopped them)

            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            sundogplanets@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #11

            Apparently the FCC gave Cowboy a one week extension for free. Because they all fucking suck.

            But I am slightly enjoying imagining how things must be going at Cowboy. They have to design their fucking ridiculous physically impossible spacecraft (that they specifically said in the FCC filing hasn't been designed yet) in the next week. Good luck, dipshits!

            riaresists@mastodon.socialR arisummerland@beige.partyA oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.socialO wikkit@mastodon.socialW sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 5 Replies Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              Apparently the FCC gave Cowboy a one week extension for free. Because they all fucking suck.

              But I am slightly enjoying imagining how things must be going at Cowboy. They have to design their fucking ridiculous physically impossible spacecraft (that they specifically said in the FCC filing hasn't been designed yet) in the next week. Good luck, dipshits!

              riaresists@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              riaresists@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              riaresists@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #12

              @sundogplanets 🤞🏼

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                Apparently the FCC gave Cowboy a one week extension for free. Because they all fucking suck.

                But I am slightly enjoying imagining how things must be going at Cowboy. They have to design their fucking ridiculous physically impossible spacecraft (that they specifically said in the FCC filing hasn't been designed yet) in the next week. Good luck, dipshits!

                arisummerland@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
                arisummerland@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
                arisummerland@beige.party
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #13

                @sundogplanets

                Now I want that as a sticker: "Good luck, dipshits!" It's one of my very favorite non-gendered pejorative words. 🤣

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Apparently the FCC gave Cowboy a one week extension for free. Because they all fucking suck.

                  But I am slightly enjoying imagining how things must be going at Cowboy. They have to design their fucking ridiculous physically impossible spacecraft (that they specifically said in the FCC filing hasn't been designed yet) in the next week. Good luck, dipshits!

                  oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #14

                  @sundogplanets

                  If anyone happens to have assembly drawings for an industrial walk-in freezer, he/she can probably sell the design to Cowboy for $50mil or so. Or plans for a suburban electric substation. Even sketches of a microwave relay tower might work. Or (best) a photo of a large PV array with goats grazing underneath.

                  It's unlikely that the "regulators" in the current Administration would be able to tell that the plans are for something other than an orbiting solar power plant.

                  mavu@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.socialO oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.social

                    @sundogplanets

                    If anyone happens to have assembly drawings for an industrial walk-in freezer, he/she can probably sell the design to Cowboy for $50mil or so. Or plans for a suburban electric substation. Even sketches of a microwave relay tower might work. Or (best) a photo of a large PV array with goats grazing underneath.

                    It's unlikely that the "regulators" in the current Administration would be able to tell that the plans are for something other than an orbiting solar power plant.

                    mavu@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mavu@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mavu@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #15

                    @oldclumsy_nowmad @sundogplanets we could assume they'll go full circle and just generate the pictures and proposal with AI.

                    But that would just make me sad.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      Apparently the FCC gave Cowboy a one week extension for free. Because they all fucking suck.

                      But I am slightly enjoying imagining how things must be going at Cowboy. They have to design their fucking ridiculous physically impossible spacecraft (that they specifically said in the FCC filing hasn't been designed yet) in the next week. Good luck, dipshits!

                      wikkit@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wikkit@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wikkit@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #16

                      @sundogplanets Hate to say it but the LLMs can do CAD now; it’s way easier for unscrupulous people to fake something to look “real enough” that it was even a year ago.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        Apparently the FCC gave Cowboy a one week extension for free. Because they all fucking suck.

                        But I am slightly enjoying imagining how things must be going at Cowboy. They have to design their fucking ridiculous physically impossible spacecraft (that they specifically said in the FCC filing hasn't been designed yet) in the next week. Good luck, dipshits!

                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #17

                        Looks like the Cowboy dipshits missed their extended FCC deadline? At least, there appears to be no new info from them.

                        ...hooray? Only 4 companies, not 5 might possibly launch hundreds of thousands of fucking gigantic satellites to give Earth a new ring system https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02757 ...that will rapidly turn into full Kessler Syndrome https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.29644

                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          Looks like the Cowboy dipshits missed their extended FCC deadline? At least, there appears to be no new info from them.

                          ...hooray? Only 4 companies, not 5 might possibly launch hundreds of thousands of fucking gigantic satellites to give Earth a new ring system https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02757 ...that will rapidly turn into full Kessler Syndrome https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.29644

                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #18

                          Oh dammit nevermind that was the wrong system number. AUGH I hate that not only do we have to watch out for stupid filings of hundreds of thousands of satellites, but we have to be careful of WHICH filing of hundreds of thousands of satellites. This is stupid. They did file something.

                          grb090423@mastodon.socialG sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            Cowboy space's application for stupidly ridiculous numbers of ludicrously large and probably impossible orbital "AI data centers" was SO BAD that the FCC asked them for loads of info. Which apparently they didn't provide by the deadline. Shucks. https://satnews.com/2026/09/13/the-fcc-asked-cowboy-space-how-big-its-satellites-are/

                            (Too bad 4 other companies have done the same fucking thing and the FCC hasn't stopped them)

                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #19

                            @sundogplanets

                            Here’s another nickname if you want: the scented one.

                            Let’s hope this atrocity has a shorter lifetime than hyper loop.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              Oh dammit nevermind that was the wrong system number. AUGH I hate that not only do we have to watch out for stupid filings of hundreds of thousands of satellites, but we have to be careful of WHICH filing of hundreds of thousands of satellites. This is stupid. They did file something.

                              grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              grb090423@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #20

                              @sundogplanets

                              Oh. Poo 😓😖

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                Oh dammit nevermind that was the wrong system number. AUGH I hate that not only do we have to watch out for stupid filings of hundreds of thousands of satellites, but we have to be careful of WHICH filing of hundreds of thousands of satellites. This is stupid. They did file something.

                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #21

                                So, their satellites will be 125m x 30m x 43m. "Cowboy Space has not yet completed its system design, but intends to design its satellites to achieve a casualty risk for an individual spacecraft of less than 0.0001 using NASA DAS"

                                HAHAHA wow. SpaceX provides ground casualty risks (zero, of course) that are completely unable to be replicated because they provide no info on their satellites. But they at least pretend that they've designed them already!

                                ...Actually I'm not sure which is worse.

                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS weddige@gruene.socialW 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  So, their satellites will be 125m x 30m x 43m. "Cowboy Space has not yet completed its system design, but intends to design its satellites to achieve a casualty risk for an individual spacecraft of less than 0.0001 using NASA DAS"

                                  HAHAHA wow. SpaceX provides ground casualty risks (zero, of course) that are completely unable to be replicated because they provide no info on their satellites. But they at least pretend that they've designed them already!

                                  ...Actually I'm not sure which is worse.

                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #22

                                  For reference, according to Wikipedia the International Space Station is 109m x 94m x 73m. And they want to launch 20,000 of them. And they haven't actually designed them yet.

                                  This is such a ridiculous load of bullshit. And yet, I have to respond to this shit otherwise the FCC will license it and then more poorly planned satellites will get launched (well, they will probably license it no matter what I do, but at least this provides legal documentation for future actions, I hope)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    So, their satellites will be 125m x 30m x 43m. "Cowboy Space has not yet completed its system design, but intends to design its satellites to achieve a casualty risk for an individual spacecraft of less than 0.0001 using NASA DAS"

                                    HAHAHA wow. SpaceX provides ground casualty risks (zero, of course) that are completely unable to be replicated because they provide no info on their satellites. But they at least pretend that they've designed them already!

                                    ...Actually I'm not sure which is worse.

                                    weddige@gruene.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    weddige@gruene.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    weddige@gruene.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #23

                                    @sundogplanets how many of these satellites do they want to send up? 20000? Then the 0.0001 casualty rate doesn't sound very reassuring 😬

                                    david@social.grelli.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      Cowboy space's application for stupidly ridiculous numbers of ludicrously large and probably impossible orbital "AI data centers" was SO BAD that the FCC asked them for loads of info. Which apparently they didn't provide by the deadline. Shucks. https://satnews.com/2026/09/13/the-fcc-asked-cowboy-space-how-big-its-satellites-are/

                                      (Too bad 4 other companies have done the same fucking thing and the FCC hasn't stopped them)

                                      torynski@mastodon.scotT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      torynski@mastodon.scotT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      torynski@mastodon.scot
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #24

                                      @sundogplanets i am not a physicist (or you can say I am failed one, as I studied it but never graduated) but can someone explain it to me: what's the point of having AI datacentre in space? I am reading it's for cooling but how they are going to cool it, there is no atmosphere to disperse the heat, there is no water to cool them down...

                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • torynski@mastodon.scotT torynski@mastodon.scot

                                        @sundogplanets i am not a physicist (or you can say I am failed one, as I studied it but never graduated) but can someone explain it to me: what's the point of having AI datacentre in space? I am reading it's for cooling but how they are going to cool it, there is no atmosphere to disperse the heat, there is no water to cool them down...

                                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #25

                                        @TOrynski I think the point is that people can't protest them as easily... absolutely nothing about data centres makes them easier or better to operate in space.

                                        torynski@mastodon.scotT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • weddige@gruene.socialW weddige@gruene.social

                                          @sundogplanets how many of these satellites do they want to send up? 20000? Then the 0.0001 casualty rate doesn't sound very reassuring 😬

                                          david@social.grelli.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          david@social.grelli.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          david@social.grelli.org
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #26
                                          @weddige@gruene.social
                                          I'm unsure if it's to be read as a count or a probability.

                                          If it's a count, we get 2 casualties over the whole fleet

                                          If it's a probability, we get a 86.5% casualty probabilty

                                          Neither sounds great

                                          @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper