Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. While you have 46 chromosomes, certain ferns carry huge numbers - the record is 1,400!

While you have 46 chromosomes, certain ferns carry huge numbers - the record is 1,400!

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
26 Indlæg 11 Posters 32 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

    @P__X - what's a cardiomyocyte? A muscle cell in the heart?

    p__x@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
    p__x@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
    p__x@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #12

    @johncarlosbaez yup. heart muscle. It looks like skeletal muscle (striated) with some "twists", like growing in branches and having polyploidy among other stuff.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • penguin42@mastodon.org.ukP penguin42@mastodon.org.uk

      @johncarlosbaez Huh so while I knew ferns were a bit odd, with the two generation thing I hadn't realise they actually had sperm/eggs - and actual moving sperm? Hmm what else in plants moves under it's own steam.

      attilakinali@society.oftrolls.comA This user is from outside of this forum
      attilakinali@society.oftrolls.comA This user is from outside of this forum
      attilakinali@society.oftrolls.com
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #13

      @penguin42 @johncarlosbaez friend of mine is a biology major and she loves ferns, because they are the oddest of them all. I once asked her what is so special about ferns and got a muli-hour lecture for free! 😅😹 🤓

      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

        @cyclotopie - Animals or seed plants. Is "animals" too unnerving? Okay, I'll get rid of it.

        I think the polyploidy is kept, with multiple near-duplicate chromosomes, but there's a difference between the haploid stage of the life cycle where there are N chromosomes and the diploid stage where there are 2N.

        (I'm not an expert on this stuff!)

        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        npars01@mstdn.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #14

        @johncarlosbaez @cyclotopie

        This "chromosome hoarding" likely explains why these ancient plants have survived so many mass extinction events

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fern_spike

        https://www.nybg.org/planttalk/how-ferns-outlived-the-dinosaurs-and-why-that-matters-today/

        https://bioone.org/journals/american-fern-journal/volume-116/issue-2/0002-8444-116.2.109/How-to-Survive-a-Mass-Extinction--Lessons-from-Fern/10.1640/0002-8444-116.2.109.full

        https://eng.geus.dk/about/news/news-archive/2019/oct/mutant-ferns

        https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/07/260722032105.htm

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

          @cyclotopie - Animals or seed plants. Is "animals" too unnerving? Okay, I'll get rid of it.

          I think the polyploidy is kept, with multiple near-duplicate chromosomes, but there's a difference between the haploid stage of the life cycle where there are N chromosomes and the diploid stage where there are 2N.

          (I'm not an expert on this stuff!)

          zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
          zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
          zwol@masto.hackers.town
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #15

          @johncarlosbaez @cyclotopie *All* land plants (clade Embryophytae, which includes, if I'm reading this right, all multicellular life that photosynthesizes, except various aquatic things lumped under the common name "algae") have alternating diploid and haploid generations. For most of them, though, the haploid generation is microscopic, embedded within and fully dependent on the diploid parent. (Apparently in some mosses it's the other way around.)

          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • zwol@masto.hackers.townZ zwol@masto.hackers.town

            @johncarlosbaez @cyclotopie *All* land plants (clade Embryophytae, which includes, if I'm reading this right, all multicellular life that photosynthesizes, except various aquatic things lumped under the common name "algae") have alternating diploid and haploid generations. For most of them, though, the haploid generation is microscopic, embedded within and fully dependent on the diploid parent. (Apparently in some mosses it's the other way around.)

            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #16

            @zwol @cyclotopie - thanks. I rewrote things to avoid trouble with this.

            Now you've got me curious about mosses!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

              Ferns live a double life, alternating between two completely separate plants each generation. The one you'd recognize as a fern - the leafy thing with fronds - is called the 'sporophyte'. Its cells are 'diploid', meaning they carry two copies of every chromosome, one from each parent, just like your own cells do.

              On the undersides of its fronds, the sporophyte produces spores, and it makes them through a special kind of cell division that halves the chromosome count. So while the sporophyte itself is diploid, its spores are 'haploid': they carry just a single copy of each chromosome.

              Here's where ferns get weird: those haploid spores don't grow into new leafy ferns! Instead, each spore grows into a tiny, separate plant - often a green heart-shaped flap just a few millimeters across - called a 'gametophyte'.

              Being haploid, this has only one copy of each chromosome, and it's this modest little plant, not the showy frond, that produces the eggs and sperm. When a sperm swimming through a film of water reaches an egg and fertilizes it, the two haploid cells combine their single chromosome sets into one cell with a double set: a diploid cell again! That grows into a new leafy sporophyte, and the cycle begins again.

              So a fern is really two alternating plants: a big diploid sporophyte that makes spores, and a small haploid gametophyte that makes eggs and sperm.

              Ferns can spread quickly because they produce vast numbers of spores, which can be blown by the wind for enormous distances. Then, when a lone spore grows into a little gametophyte, this can fertilize itself!

              (2/2)

              iainmerrick@mastodon.scotI This user is from outside of this forum
              iainmerrick@mastodon.scotI This user is from outside of this forum
              iainmerrick@mastodon.scot
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #17

              @johncarlosbaez What!? I had no idea, that's fascinating.

              I have a running joke about ferns with my son (which he found exciting when younger, now just embarrassing) having watched lots of TV shows about dinosaurs, especially huge sauropods who ate tons of ferns.

              "Uh oh, I see some ferns over there. Better watch out for dinosaurs!"

              Now we'd better keep an eye out for gametophytes as well.

              johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • iainmerrick@mastodon.scotI iainmerrick@mastodon.scot

                @johncarlosbaez What!? I had no idea, that's fascinating.

                I have a running joke about ferns with my son (which he found exciting when younger, now just embarrassing) having watched lots of TV shows about dinosaurs, especially huge sauropods who ate tons of ferns.

                "Uh oh, I see some ferns over there. Better watch out for dinosaurs!"

                Now we'd better keep an eye out for gametophytes as well.

                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #18

                @iainmerrick - there are lots of ferns here in Edinburgh; now I'm going to look for gametophytes.

                I'll keep an eye out for dinosaurs as well.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • attilakinali@society.oftrolls.comA attilakinali@society.oftrolls.com

                  @penguin42 @johncarlosbaez friend of mine is a biology major and she loves ferns, because they are the oddest of them all. I once asked her what is so special about ferns and got a muli-hour lecture for free! 😅😹 🤓

                  johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #19

                  @attilakinali - I've always found ferns beautiful. After reading this article I want to learn more about them.

                  https://hikersnotebook.blog/2026/09/01/hay-scented-fern/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                    Ferns live a double life, alternating between two completely separate plants each generation. The one you'd recognize as a fern - the leafy thing with fronds - is called the 'sporophyte'. Its cells are 'diploid', meaning they carry two copies of every chromosome, one from each parent, just like your own cells do.

                    On the undersides of its fronds, the sporophyte produces spores, and it makes them through a special kind of cell division that halves the chromosome count. So while the sporophyte itself is diploid, its spores are 'haploid': they carry just a single copy of each chromosome.

                    Here's where ferns get weird: those haploid spores don't grow into new leafy ferns! Instead, each spore grows into a tiny, separate plant - often a green heart-shaped flap just a few millimeters across - called a 'gametophyte'.

                    Being haploid, this has only one copy of each chromosome, and it's this modest little plant, not the showy frond, that produces the eggs and sperm. When a sperm swimming through a film of water reaches an egg and fertilizes it, the two haploid cells combine their single chromosome sets into one cell with a double set: a diploid cell again! That grows into a new leafy sporophyte, and the cycle begins again.

                    So a fern is really two alternating plants: a big diploid sporophyte that makes spores, and a small haploid gametophyte that makes eggs and sperm.

                    Ferns can spread quickly because they produce vast numbers of spores, which can be blown by the wind for enormous distances. Then, when a lone spore grows into a little gametophyte, this can fertilize itself!

                    (2/2)

                    bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bnuuy@mathstodon.xyz
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #20

                    @johncarlosbaez i have to point out that the alternating generations thing isn't just a fern thing. all (well, at least land) plants do this, even if the haploid generation is reduced to 'barely noticable' in most of them. like, 'you'll need a microscope' barely noticable.

                    it's very visible with mosses though, where the green part of the moss is the haploid gametophyte, and the "stalks" that stretch up from the green parts are the diploid sporophytes.

                    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB bnuuy@mathstodon.xyz

                      @johncarlosbaez i have to point out that the alternating generations thing isn't just a fern thing. all (well, at least land) plants do this, even if the haploid generation is reduced to 'barely noticable' in most of them. like, 'you'll need a microscope' barely noticable.

                      it's very visible with mosses though, where the green part of the moss is the haploid gametophyte, and the "stalks" that stretch up from the green parts are the diploid sporophytes.

                      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #21

                      @bnuuy - I've seen those, but not known much about what's going on!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB bnuuy@mathstodon.xyz

                        @johncarlosbaez i have to point out that the alternating generations thing isn't just a fern thing. all (well, at least land) plants do this, even if the haploid generation is reduced to 'barely noticable' in most of them. like, 'you'll need a microscope' barely noticable.

                        it's very visible with mosses though, where the green part of the moss is the haploid gametophyte, and the "stalks" that stretch up from the green parts are the diploid sporophytes.

                        bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bnuuy@mathstodon.xyz
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #22

                        @johncarlosbaez i see @zwol has already made a similar comment. but let me add a bit more:

                        > (Apparently in some mosses it's the other way around.)

                        mosses are, uh "early" in land plant evolution history. the generations are more on equal footing, but there was a switch from the haploid generation being the green part, to the diploid generation being the green part, and the switch was made in the transition from mosses to ferns, the, uh, "next step" of land plant evolution.
                        (the scare quotes are there because technically, evolution doesn't "work like that", much like modern apes aren't the ancestor to humans)

                        for anyone wanting to learn more about this kind of stuff, this is pretty standard biology lecture material. it's typically this pair of introductory lectures that goes through the evolutionary history of plants/animals, respectively. iirc the professor dave explains youtube channel has them in a playlist video format.

                        zwol@masto.hackers.townZ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                          Ferns live a double life, alternating between two completely separate plants each generation. The one you'd recognize as a fern - the leafy thing with fronds - is called the 'sporophyte'. Its cells are 'diploid', meaning they carry two copies of every chromosome, one from each parent, just like your own cells do.

                          On the undersides of its fronds, the sporophyte produces spores, and it makes them through a special kind of cell division that halves the chromosome count. So while the sporophyte itself is diploid, its spores are 'haploid': they carry just a single copy of each chromosome.

                          Here's where ferns get weird: those haploid spores don't grow into new leafy ferns! Instead, each spore grows into a tiny, separate plant - often a green heart-shaped flap just a few millimeters across - called a 'gametophyte'.

                          Being haploid, this has only one copy of each chromosome, and it's this modest little plant, not the showy frond, that produces the eggs and sperm. When a sperm swimming through a film of water reaches an egg and fertilizes it, the two haploid cells combine their single chromosome sets into one cell with a double set: a diploid cell again! That grows into a new leafy sporophyte, and the cycle begins again.

                          So a fern is really two alternating plants: a big diploid sporophyte that makes spores, and a small haploid gametophyte that makes eggs and sperm.

                          Ferns can spread quickly because they produce vast numbers of spores, which can be blown by the wind for enormous distances. Then, when a lone spore grows into a little gametophyte, this can fertilize itself!

                          (2/2)

                          furrybeta@shark.communityF This user is from outside of this forum
                          furrybeta@shark.communityF This user is from outside of this forum
                          furrybeta@shark.community
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #23

                          @johncarlosbaez Plant biology is freaking wild. Haploid, diploid, genes replicated many times over, methylation (iirc) causing the same genetic structure to produce different fruits (citrus), and/or looking plants (broccoli)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB bnuuy@mathstodon.xyz

                            @johncarlosbaez i see @zwol has already made a similar comment. but let me add a bit more:

                            > (Apparently in some mosses it's the other way around.)

                            mosses are, uh "early" in land plant evolution history. the generations are more on equal footing, but there was a switch from the haploid generation being the green part, to the diploid generation being the green part, and the switch was made in the transition from mosses to ferns, the, uh, "next step" of land plant evolution.
                            (the scare quotes are there because technically, evolution doesn't "work like that", much like modern apes aren't the ancestor to humans)

                            for anyone wanting to learn more about this kind of stuff, this is pretty standard biology lecture material. it's typically this pair of introductory lectures that goes through the evolutionary history of plants/animals, respectively. iirc the professor dave explains youtube channel has them in a playlist video format.

                            zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            zwol@masto.hackers.town
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #24

                            @bnuuy @johncarlosbaez wikipedia gives me the impression that the "ancestral" state is currently thought to have had haploid and diploid generations that were fully independent and externally almost identical, and mosses and ferns diverged from that baseline in opposite directions.

                            bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • zwol@masto.hackers.townZ zwol@masto.hackers.town

                              @bnuuy @johncarlosbaez wikipedia gives me the impression that the "ancestral" state is currently thought to have had haploid and diploid generations that were fully independent and externally almost identical, and mosses and ferns diverged from that baseline in opposite directions.

                              bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bnuuy@mathstodon.xyz
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #25

                              @zwol @johncarlosbaez also looking at wikipedia, yeah, that checks out. or at least doesn't outright contradict that, idk. a lot of this early evolutionary history is pretty fuzzy, we can only guess from comparison of the plants we have today, as well as (very importantly!) genetic evidence to help us reconstruct those "family trees"/cladograms. sometimes people argue about the exact order in which everything split off, or things get re-organized as new evidence rolls in. there's sometimes this "established narrative" that gets taught and happens to sound good, but may or may not be outdated, depending on who you ask.

                              zwol@masto.hackers.townZ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • bnuuy@mathstodon.xyzB bnuuy@mathstodon.xyz

                                @zwol @johncarlosbaez also looking at wikipedia, yeah, that checks out. or at least doesn't outright contradict that, idk. a lot of this early evolutionary history is pretty fuzzy, we can only guess from comparison of the plants we have today, as well as (very importantly!) genetic evidence to help us reconstruct those "family trees"/cladograms. sometimes people argue about the exact order in which everything split off, or things get re-organized as new evidence rolls in. there's sometimes this "established narrative" that gets taught and happens to sound good, but may or may not be outdated, depending on who you ask.

                                zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zwol@masto.hackers.town
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #26

                                @bnuuy @johncarlosbaez yeh so much of this is different from what I learned in high school bio 30 years ago...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                Svar
                                • Svar som emne
                                Login for at svare
                                • Ældste til nyeste
                                • Nyeste til ældste
                                • Most Votes


                                • Log ind

                                • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Hjem
                                • Seneste
                                • Etiketter
                                • Populære
                                • Verden
                                • Bruger
                                • Grupper