Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I can't just

I can't just

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
19 Indlæg 17 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ginevracat@toot.communityG ginevracat@toot.community

    @researchfairy I feel this too. Like the whole world is sucked into a collective Emperor's New Clothes psychosis and I'm yelling "You're all naked. Can't you feel the cold!" But now the shops only sell the new non-clothes too!

    robotistry@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    robotistry@fediscience.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    robotistry@fediscience.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #8

    @GinevraCat @researchfairy Today I learned that some people in robotics are following the horrendous path laid out in a conference keynote a few years ago of "The robots seem to be more robust when we replace <hand-coded / assembled set of tools> with <big blob of machine learning>. Maybe we should be considering developing <end-to-end blob of machine learning> to replace all the perception and actuation and planning and control components!"

    I attended this talk from a seat in the back with a conference-provided sandwich. I heard this and was silently screaming "Noooooo!" as I thought about how hard it is to verify and test an autonomous system when you *have* transparency and insight into the individual components and how they relate to each other.

    If all you have is a blob of weights and a pointer to a model card and data sheet for the training data? How do you figure out what to test? How do you figure out what your test results mean in terms of evidence that the system will or won't work under operational conditions? It's a catastrophically bad idea in so many ways. And yet people are chasing lemmings off cliffs after it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • kleines_z@queer.groupK This user is from outside of this forum
      kleines_z@queer.groupK This user is from outside of this forum
      kleines_z@queer.group
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #9

      @tanghus @researchfairy
      Well, it says it does try to blacklist slop sites. But it's obviously hard to do.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mikill@mastodon.worldM mikill@mastodon.world

        @researchfairy "is a major driver of climate change"? Currently or (potentially) in the future?

        researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        researchfairy@scholar.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        researchfairy@scholar.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #10

        @mikill Why are you nitpicking this?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

          I can't just

          "Not use AI"

          AI is polluting the world and is a major driver of climate change, and even if I don't use it, it is still hurting me

          AI is actively destroying the scientific literature that I need to work with, and even if I refuse to use it, it is still making my life worse

          AI is deskilling my colleagues and stunting my students' growth in a way that I can't fight or compensate for

          I don't use it for anything, but I still can't fucking "opt out"

          a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          a_cubed@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #11

          @researchfairy @tante
          I resemble this remark. At least one student per semester submitting something without even hiding that it's LLM Bullshit. Not sure howmajy are using it and hiding it well instead oflearning to walk sk they can later run (I'm teaching writing skills at ug and pg. levels)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mathew@universeodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
            mathew@universeodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
            mathew@universeodon.com
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #12

            @tanghus @researchfairy uBlacklist. https://ublacklist.github.io/

            Works with DuckDuckGo and others as well as Google.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • quasit@kolektiva.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quasit@kolektiva.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quasit@kolektiva.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #13

              @tanghus @researchfairy

              We need the option to create, share, and curate blacklists!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                I can't just

                "Not use AI"

                AI is polluting the world and is a major driver of climate change, and even if I don't use it, it is still hurting me

                AI is actively destroying the scientific literature that I need to work with, and even if I refuse to use it, it is still making my life worse

                AI is deskilling my colleagues and stunting my students' growth in a way that I can't fight or compensate for

                I don't use it for anything, but I still can't fucking "opt out"

                shadowfetchai@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                shadowfetchai@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                shadowfetchai@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #14

                @researchfairy Yeah, I feel that. It's like the App Store review process; I can follow all the rules, but I'm still subject to the downstream effects of other developers spamming, scamming, or just shipping garbage. It lowers the bar for everyone.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                  I can't just

                  "Not use AI"

                  AI is polluting the world and is a major driver of climate change, and even if I don't use it, it is still hurting me

                  AI is actively destroying the scientific literature that I need to work with, and even if I refuse to use it, it is still making my life worse

                  AI is deskilling my colleagues and stunting my students' growth in a way that I can't fight or compensate for

                  I don't use it for anything, but I still can't fucking "opt out"

                  hellomiakoda@pdx.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  hellomiakoda@pdx.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  hellomiakoda@pdx.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #15

                  @researchfairy It's a very sad situation. AI has some very helpful uses, from finding errors in pagues upon pages of config very quickly, to helping those who are disable, etc... But the WAY it's being used, and the way it's being shoved in to absolutely everything, and the scale of it all, the AI situation we have right now is so incredibly destructive.
                  It's like harnessing radiation. We can make energy cleaner than coal and treat cancer, or we can nuke people. ...we nuked people

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                    I can't just

                    "Not use AI"

                    AI is polluting the world and is a major driver of climate change, and even if I don't use it, it is still hurting me

                    AI is actively destroying the scientific literature that I need to work with, and even if I refuse to use it, it is still making my life worse

                    AI is deskilling my colleagues and stunting my students' growth in a way that I can't fight or compensate for

                    I don't use it for anything, but I still can't fucking "opt out"

                    jaypatelani@bsd.networkJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jaypatelani@bsd.networkJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jaypatelani@bsd.network
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #16

                    @researchfairy you can always choose NetBSD. NetBSD foundation rejects AI code commits. More funds are needed to such foundations. While Linux graciously allows AI

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                      I can't just

                      "Not use AI"

                      AI is polluting the world and is a major driver of climate change, and even if I don't use it, it is still hurting me

                      AI is actively destroying the scientific literature that I need to work with, and even if I refuse to use it, it is still making my life worse

                      AI is deskilling my colleagues and stunting my students' growth in a way that I can't fight or compensate for

                      I don't use it for anything, but I still can't fucking "opt out"

                      bpl@snac.bsd.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bpl@snac.bsd.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bpl@snac.bsd.cafe
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #17
                      I would not look at this as 0-1 situation. If someone opposes a thing, one can not use it and loudly say about the reasons. It does not mean that everything around will change, but we need living examples that life without harmful things is possible. This can be inspiring to others. If people would have to stop using AI right now, the ban would have to come from autocrat - which is fine, but people would not understand why this change is needed.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                        I can't just

                        "Not use AI"

                        AI is polluting the world and is a major driver of climate change, and even if I don't use it, it is still hurting me

                        AI is actively destroying the scientific literature that I need to work with, and even if I refuse to use it, it is still making my life worse

                        AI is deskilling my colleagues and stunting my students' growth in a way that I can't fight or compensate for

                        I don't use it for anything, but I still can't fucking "opt out"

                        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        npars01@mstdn.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #18

                        @researchfairy @tante

                        The billionaires promoting AI are some of the worst people on the planet.

                        Wannabe despots just like Putin, Koch Network, & #PrinceBonesaw. The greed.

                        All assuring us of their benign intent while frying the planet, eroding democracy & law, evading taxation, & creating huge mass layoff schemes

                        https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/19/billionaires-ai-complacency-resistance

                        https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2026-new-ai-billionaires-list/

                        https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/20/jeff-bezos-taxes-ai-corporations-trump.html

                        https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/05/52681853/bernie-sanders-ai-moving-too-fast-billionaires-congress

                        https://www.gadgetreview.com/silicon-valleys-soothing-lies-about-your-ai-future

                        https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2025/12/ai-boom-young-billionaires/685360/

                        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/29/technology/new-billionaires-ai-boom.html

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • researchfairy@scholar.socialR researchfairy@scholar.social

                          I can't just

                          "Not use AI"

                          AI is polluting the world and is a major driver of climate change, and even if I don't use it, it is still hurting me

                          AI is actively destroying the scientific literature that I need to work with, and even if I refuse to use it, it is still making my life worse

                          AI is deskilling my colleagues and stunting my students' growth in a way that I can't fight or compensate for

                          I don't use it for anything, but I still can't fucking "opt out"

                          evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                          evan@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                          evan@cosocial.ca
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #19

                          @researchfairy AI is not a major driver of climate change.

                          All IT is responsible for about 2% of greenhouse gas emissions. AI is responsible for about 0.1% of greenhouse gas emissions.

                          You can know the actual major drivers of climate change. They are published annually by most countries, states, cities and companies. They are things like gas cars, cement manufacturing, rice cultivation, cattle.

                          I'm not arguing for AI; I'm arguing against not understanding climate change.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tanyakaroli@expressional.socialT tanyakaroli@expressional.social shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper