Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
172 Indlæg 109 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • klausfiend@mstdn.caK klausfiend@mstdn.ca

    @davidtheeviloverlord @sundogplanets You _can_ do it, but the costs are (without irony, word choice intended) astronomical. You could liquid cool the inside of an orbital DC, but you'd still need a TON of surface area on external heat exchangers to passively radiate that heat away, since you can't rely on either convection or conduction—which are much much faster for heat transfer—but also aren't possible in a vacuum. A DC in space is basically the inside of a giant Yeti thermos, and that inside has an operational temperature range up to about 80C, but without cooling will easily get up to 140C or hotter—at which point stuff fails catastrophically; you have to move a lot of Joules to keep things operating in range.

    Which is all to say that it's not _impossible_, but it IS nonetheless wildly impractical. But it is also calculable: DC math isn't hard, and manufacturers include power inputs and thermal outputs in their spec sheets—so omitting that seems very deliberate.

    503bartley@pdx.social5 This user is from outside of this forum
    503bartley@pdx.social5 This user is from outside of this forum
    503bartley@pdx.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #161

    @klausfiend @davidtheeviloverlord @sundogplanets What 'would' work is the space compute concept of http://server-sky.com #ServerSky

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      @lauren Let me know if you want any info or want to chat about it - there are now over 2 million satellites proposed

      abramkedge@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
      abramkedge@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
      abramkedge@beige.party
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #162

      @sundogplanets @lauren two million! What would that do to the collision clock? A couple of days goes to... a few minutes?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

        A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

        fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
        fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
        fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.uk
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #163

        @sundogplanets this is just the corporate version of pump and dump, isn't it. "invest in us!" … "oops all the money's been 'spent', bye now."

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          This company also posted an ex parte filing (which means they had a super special extra FCC meeting), their satellites are too fucking huge to even be physically possible. They just can't fucking do this.

          My estimate from looking at this ridiculous sketch is 8x60x10m solar panels... that's a reflecting area of 4800 m^2. The International Space Station, the biggest thing in orbit, has a solar panel area of about 3400 m^2.

          frankendrullat@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          frankendrullat@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          frankendrullat@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #164

          @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Also, there’re potential national security / infrastructure resilience issues. Traditional data centres are mostly covered by air defense systems of the country they’re in.

          These orbital data centres can literally be taken out by a handful of nuts and bolts thrown into their orbit.

          The very same defense was to be used by the Soviet Union if the US were ever to put multibillion $$ laser satellites into orbit under their SDI program proposed in the 80s.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

            A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

            evilk@universeodon.comE This user is from outside of this forum
            evilk@universeodon.comE This user is from outside of this forum
            evilk@universeodon.com
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #165

            @sundogplanets
            https://www.threads.com/share/_ibNWVuqk/

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              This company also posted an ex parte filing (which means they had a super special extra FCC meeting), their satellites are too fucking huge to even be physically possible. They just can't fucking do this.

              My estimate from looking at this ridiculous sketch is 8x60x10m solar panels... that's a reflecting area of 4800 m^2. The International Space Station, the biggest thing in orbit, has a solar panel area of about 3400 m^2.

              ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
              ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
              ericlawton@kolektiva.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #166

              @sundogplanets

              The FCC?
              Is this the Federation of Planets, or jut the US?

              In which case, who gave them authority over the solar system? The United Nations? Some god? Let's see the paperwork!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                The rest of the astronomy section is pure bullshit, unadulterated by any facts or actual information.

                "We will definitely work with astronomers, and we definitely won't have any reflections because our satellites are magical, we also won't have any infrared emissions, even though physics says that very hot things emit blackbody radiation. We are cowboys, not bound by mere LAWS OF PHYSICS."

                internic@mathstodon.xyzI This user is from outside of this forum
                internic@mathstodon.xyzI This user is from outside of this forum
                internic@mathstodon.xyz
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #167

                @sundogplanets Also funny when they built a giant radiator whose sole purpose is to emit infrared radiation. Like, even if it somehow could break the laws of physics and not emit, that would defeat its entire point.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  The rest of the astronomy section is pure bullshit, unadulterated by any facts or actual information.

                  "We will definitely work with astronomers, and we definitely won't have any reflections because our satellites are magical, we also won't have any infrared emissions, even though physics says that very hot things emit blackbody radiation. We are cowboys, not bound by mere LAWS OF PHYSICS."

                  ditsch42@troet.cafeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  ditsch42@troet.cafeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  ditsch42@troet.cafe
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #168

                  @sundogplanets I'm sorry you have to deal with this, and also thanks for dealing with this for all of us I assume if they are fans of AI data centers, large portions of this bullshit report including the ridiculous satellite size have been designed by AI...?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    Oh gosh I don't know if I can actually read this. "The United States is engaged in a race for AI dominance, and as the terrestrial electric grid is overwhelmed by the demands of new data centers this race is now a race for space dominance as well"

                    FUCK THIS OUTRIGHT COLONIALIST DOGSHIT. WOW.

                    "Very little in the record disputes Cowboy Space’s qualifications"

                    HAHAHA that's because you haven't fucking done ANYTHING!!!

                    virginicus@universeodon.comV This user is from outside of this forum
                    virginicus@universeodon.comV This user is from outside of this forum
                    virginicus@universeodon.com
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #169

                    @sundogplanets talkingpointsmemo.com had a great piece today. It started off talking about why there’s such a strong backlash against data centers, but finished with the reason the Tech Lords want them in space: because they can’t handle it when county commissions and zoning boards have power over them.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                      @klausfiend Data center companies are already eating that cost. They don't replace individual GPUs. They just shut off the unit and leave it be.

                      But that failure rate will be WAY higher with zero gravity, the heat differentials of space, and radiation.

                      @sundogplanets

                      faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                      faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                      faithisleaping@anarres.family
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #170

                      @klausfiend @sundogplanets Sorry to ping an old thread but I just learned that intel is getting in on the grift:

                      https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/923451/intel-starfire-built-for-extremes-powered-by-intel.html

                      They’ve utterly failed to make any headway in data center AI so now they’re advertising space grade AI in an attempt to drink from the VC firehose. And of course they’re bragging about domestic US manufacturing, too.

                      I can guarantee you that no one at Intel knows anything about building space grade hardware. But, hey, no one needs to care about that until after they’ve pulled a few billion in contracts.

                      klausfiend@mstdn.caK 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        This company also posted an ex parte filing (which means they had a super special extra FCC meeting), their satellites are too fucking huge to even be physically possible. They just can't fucking do this.

                        My estimate from looking at this ridiculous sketch is 8x60x10m solar panels... that's a reflecting area of 4800 m^2. The International Space Station, the biggest thing in orbit, has a solar panel area of about 3400 m^2.

                        oldguycrusty@mastodon.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
                        oldguycrusty@mastodon.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
                        oldguycrusty@mastodon.world
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #171

                        @sundogplanets

                        Could this be 'merely' an enormous Investment scam? i.e; a lie so BIG and prepostrous that only super rich people will believe it?

                        They all buy in for a few hundred million here & and few hundred million there, then finally it all goes bankrupt after 'losing' a few billion & the C-suite of the 'failed' company slinks off to their private Islands and mega-mansions, to bask in their colossal 'failure'?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                          @klausfiend @sundogplanets Sorry to ping an old thread but I just learned that intel is getting in on the grift:

                          https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/923451/intel-starfire-built-for-extremes-powered-by-intel.html

                          They’ve utterly failed to make any headway in data center AI so now they’re advertising space grade AI in an attempt to drink from the VC firehose. And of course they’re bragging about domestic US manufacturing, too.

                          I can guarantee you that no one at Intel knows anything about building space grade hardware. But, hey, no one needs to care about that until after they’ve pulled a few billion in contracts.

                          klausfiend@mstdn.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                          klausfiend@mstdn.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                          klausfiend@mstdn.ca
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #172

                          @faithisleaping The failure of Intel is a real Kodak moment.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper