Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The UK social media ban for under-16s does nothing to sort out the harms caused by platforms.

The UK social media ban for under-16s does nothing to sort out the harms caused by platforms.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
socialmediabansocialmediastarmerstopkillinginteukpolitics
12 Indlæg 7 Posters 11 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

    A social media ban addresses the symptoms, not the cause of online harms.

    Platforms rely on extensive data collection to target ads and keep users online for longer.

    Algorithms prioritise content most likely to capture attention and drive interaction, spreading harmful, polarising and addictive content.

    #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

    openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
    openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
    openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #2

    An under-16s ban means making every adult prove they're over 16 for access.

    The data shared for age verification can also be used by platforms and the wider data broker ecosystem to send you ads and customised content.

    It's a policy that fuels the very business model that generates online harms.

    #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

    openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO cobalt123@beige.partyC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

      The UK social media ban for under-16s does nothing to sort out the harms caused by platforms.

      Harmful content is a product of a business model that uses data to drive engagement and target users with ads.

      Digital ID checks feed more data into this system, while leaving the engine for harms unchecked.

      Read our response ⬇️

      https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/starmers-social-media-ban-fails-to-address-root-causes-of-online-harms/

      #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

      openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
      openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
      openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #3

      A social media ban addresses the symptoms, not the cause of online harms.

      Platforms rely on extensive data collection to target ads and keep users online for longer.

      Algorithms prioritise content most likely to capture attention and drive interaction, spreading harmful, polarising and addictive content.

      #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

      openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

        An under-16s ban means making every adult prove they're over 16 for access.

        The data shared for age verification can also be used by platforms and the wider data broker ecosystem to send you ads and customised content.

        It's a policy that fuels the very business model that generates online harms.

        #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

        openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
        openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
        openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #4

        Age verification is being extended to block vast areas of the Internet.

        That means millions of people handing over ID documents and biometric data to unregulated providers.

        It becomes a treasure trove for hackers, as has already been seen since introducing age checks with the Discord data leak.

        #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship #discord

        openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

          Age verification is being extended to block vast areas of the Internet.

          That means millions of people handing over ID documents and biometric data to unregulated providers.

          It becomes a treasure trove for hackers, as has already been seen since introducing age checks with the Discord data leak.

          #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship #discord

          openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
          openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
          openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #5

          Banning under-16s online restricts access to information while creating huge privacy risks.

          Instead the UK government should target the root cause of online harms.

          That means tackling the business model of social media platforms – from targeted ads and algorithms to user lock-in.

          Sign the petition ⬇️

          https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/break-big-tech

          #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

          uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.netU 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

            The UK social media ban for under-16s does nothing to sort out the harms caused by platforms.

            Harmful content is a product of a business model that uses data to drive engagement and target users with ads.

            Digital ID checks feed more data into this system, while leaving the engine for harms unchecked.

            Read our response ⬇️

            https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/starmers-social-media-ban-fails-to-address-root-causes-of-online-harms/

            #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

            scg@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
            scg@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
            scg@mas.to
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #6

            @openrightsgroup keeps timing me out when I try to sign 🤷

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

              An under-16s ban means making every adult prove they're over 16 for access.

              The data shared for age verification can also be used by platforms and the wider data broker ecosystem to send you ads and customised content.

              It's a policy that fuels the very business model that generates online harms.

              #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

              cobalt123@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
              cobalt123@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
              cobalt123@beige.party
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #7

              @openrightsgroup Yet all over the world it’s ok for under-16s to get married, even forced to marry. Because that is safe for children, right? Just think: less information available to children who may need it desperately. Children who are harmed by adults who view them as slaves or property. What evil cruelty.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

                Banning under-16s online restricts access to information while creating huge privacy risks.

                Instead the UK government should target the root cause of online harms.

                That means tackling the business model of social media platforms – from targeted ads and algorithms to user lock-in.

                Sign the petition ⬇️

                https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/break-big-tech

                #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

                uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
                uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
                uriel@bbs.keinpfusch.net
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #8

                @openrightsgroup

                > That means tackling the business model of social media platforms – from targeted ads and algorithms to user lock-in.

                yep. And this is the good part. Stopping wealth extraction.

                --
                Uriel Fanelli
                Using Aktor: https://git.keinpfusch.net/loweel/Aktor-2
                XMPP: uriel@keinpfusch.net
                old blog: https://blog.keinpfusch.net
                new blog: https://keinpfusch.net

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

                  The UK social media ban for under-16s does nothing to sort out the harms caused by platforms.

                  Harmful content is a product of a business model that uses data to drive engagement and target users with ads.

                  Digital ID checks feed more data into this system, while leaving the engine for harms unchecked.

                  Read our response ⬇️

                  https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/starmers-social-media-ban-fails-to-address-root-causes-of-online-harms/

                  #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

                  sxa@fosstodon.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sxa@fosstodon.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sxa@fosstodon.org
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #9

                  @openrightsgroup Genuine question - what is your proposal for "Compelling social media companies to let us take our followers and data with us if we want to leave their platforms." given that users don't (and arguably shouldn't) have a global identify that can work across platforms. The data I get (and most let you export) but automatically moving followers feels a lot harder.

                  openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sxa@fosstodon.orgS sxa@fosstodon.org

                    @openrightsgroup Genuine question - what is your proposal for "Compelling social media companies to let us take our followers and data with us if we want to leave their platforms." given that users don't (and arguably shouldn't) have a global identify that can work across platforms. The data I get (and most let you export) but automatically moving followers feels a lot harder.

                    openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
                    openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO This user is from outside of this forum
                    openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #10

                    @sxa This is part of a push for interoperability between platforms, giving users greater choice with the ability to switch where their account is hosted and drive competition for better moderation systems, recommendation feeds, or advertising models.

                    Our report details our proposals to improve on the online environment through user empowerment ⬇️

                    https://www.openrightsgroup.org/publications/making-platforms-accountable-empowering-users-and-creating-safety/

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

                      The UK social media ban for under-16s does nothing to sort out the harms caused by platforms.

                      Harmful content is a product of a business model that uses data to drive engagement and target users with ads.

                      Digital ID checks feed more data into this system, while leaving the engine for harms unchecked.

                      Read our response ⬇️

                      https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/starmers-social-media-ban-fails-to-address-root-causes-of-online-harms/

                      #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      carenanaas@mastodon.uno
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #11

                      @openrightsgroup
                      If the content were to be regulated as per normal media... TV, newsppers, radio, would this help...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

                        The UK social media ban for under-16s does nothing to sort out the harms caused by platforms.

                        Harmful content is a product of a business model that uses data to drive engagement and target users with ads.

                        Digital ID checks feed more data into this system, while leaving the engine for harms unchecked.

                        Read our response ⬇️

                        https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/starmers-social-media-ban-fails-to-address-root-causes-of-online-harms/

                        #socialmediaban #socialmedia #starmer #stopkillinginternet #ukpolitics #ukpol #onlinesafety #ageverification #digitalid #privacy #censorship

                        tomwor@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tomwor@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tomwor@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #12

                        RE: https://social.openrightsgroup.org/@openrightsgroup/116753407017940135

                        @openrightsgroup This could be so simple: 1. Add age attestation (no ID needed) to the operating system 2. require mandatory API's to query age bracket (made transparent for user) for every operating system over a certain threshhold of market share 3. make every app vendor and website implement checks against this API and show only age-appropriate content. / This way parents would have agency. Transparent and anonymous.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper