Right in the middle of a rainy moment, a tiny bird becomes the star of something truly magical—a perfect water droplet lands on its head, forming a crown-like splash that feels almost unreal.
-
Yeah, I mean, that's exactly where I am
I love photos -- no, strike that: images -- and simply love something new and entertaining
And, as I just posted to another thread, a whole hell of a lot of #AI experts simply seem to have never heard of Adobe Photoshop
I'm so old I can remember when the goto put-down gotcha! tag was "'shopped!!!"
Now people with no clue see anything unusual and it's all with the "AI!! AI!! AI!!'
... and filter! Filter! Filter!
-
We are now living in a world with filters, Photoshop, and AI.
I really don't know if this oic is real or not; some checkers say no, some yes. Some could be, but it has no misinformation, just beauty, and it's nice to see.you say "I really don't know if this pic is real or not" - then why are you posting it? If it's not real, then it is fake and disinformation. Do you want to contribute to spreading fake images online?
You also say in some other post "I just want to share beautiful pics of nature and architecture" - but if this is AI-generated, then it is not a picture of nature. It is a fake image and, just like photoshopped ads it gives a fake impression of what nature is.
Even giving you the benefit of the doubt for posting in good faith originally, now that so many people explained why it was actually AI-generated, why are you not deleting the post?
-
@Adrenochrome hey, just fyi y'all can use the Google SynthID watermark checker to verify that this was AI-generated.
@lynatic @Adrenochrome Asking the slop machine to tell you if something was produced by the slop machine.
All it's going to do is what it always does: give you an "answer" that sounds plausible.
-
Right in the middle of a rainy moment, a tiny bird becomes the star of something truly magical—a perfect water droplet lands on its head, forming a crown-like splash that feels almost unreal. The timing is flawless, capturing a split second where nature turns playful.
The photo was taken by Lee Schofer and posted by his partner, Kate Weyer, on her Facebook.
#NaturePhotography #Plant #Plants #Flower #Flowers #Animal #Animals #Wildlife #WildlifePhotography #Photographer
https://x.com/Sci_Nature0/status/2045886932463304729@Adrenochrome@mastodon.social That splash is suspicious: What's the water bouncing up from?
Looks like what happens when water falls into water... but a bird is not water. -
@lynatic @Adrenochrome Asking the slop machine to tell you if something was produced by the slop machine.
All it's going to do is what it always does: give you an "answer" that sounds plausible.
@dalias @Adrenochrome typing @SynthID in a Gemini message forces a SynthID tool call to execute before the LLM runs. The LLM receives the output from the SynthID checker (a very normal old-school program) + your message as context.
Of course the LLM could still randomly decide to lie about the result of the tool call, that's why I ran this and similar queries multiple times in different chat contexts.
To answer why I'm using an LLM to do this at all: There simply seems to be no other way to reliably use the SynthID checker (sometimes the Google reverse image search executes it and notifies you of a positive but sometimes it also doesn't) , this is the only supported way by Google (even tho I still consider it bad design).
-
@dalias @Adrenochrome typing @SynthID in a Gemini message forces a SynthID tool call to execute before the LLM runs. The LLM receives the output from the SynthID checker (a very normal old-school program) + your message as context.
Of course the LLM could still randomly decide to lie about the result of the tool call, that's why I ran this and similar queries multiple times in different chat contexts.
To answer why I'm using an LLM to do this at all: There simply seems to be no other way to reliably use the SynthID checker (sometimes the Google reverse image search executes it and notifies you of a positive but sometimes it also doesn't) , this is the only supported way by Google (even tho I still consider it bad design).
@lynatic @Adrenochrome Exactly, that's the problem. It's taking a somewhat rigorous result, but then passing the output through an LLM which could just alter or replace that result with whatever bullshit it deems statistically plausible.
-
@Adrenochrome this is AI but if this were a surrealist painting it would sure be magical.
The feet along with the branch, the shadows and light simply don't match, hard to notice if you are not trained that alone is enough to tell.@Adrenochrome I'm a graphic designer, I've spent hpurs looking at the smallest details
So 1. The feet are too well focused compared to the branch = fake or poor editing 2. look at the feet one has 3 falanges and the other has 4, one has a nail-finger, the other does not. 3. Shadows come from different directions, plus if it's raining there's most likely no direct sun to cast those shadows. 4. The feathers look like hair = creepy, from a far they do the job but that's... hair. -
@Adrenochrome I'm a graphic designer, I've spent hpurs looking at the smallest details
So 1. The feet are too well focused compared to the branch = fake or poor editing 2. look at the feet one has 3 falanges and the other has 4, one has a nail-finger, the other does not. 3. Shadows come from different directions, plus if it's raining there's most likely no direct sun to cast those shadows. 4. The feathers look like hair = creepy, from a far they do the job but that's... hair.@Adrenochrome 5. Why does the moss look radioactive green? It looks like 1 dollar store fake plants with water. 6. I won't say anything about the dropplet at first sight I thought it was photoshoped but I'm also an engineer and that's not how dropplets work... nor camaras... so yeah.
-
Right in the middle of a rainy moment, a tiny bird becomes the star of something truly magical—a perfect water droplet lands on its head, forming a crown-like splash that feels almost unreal. The timing is flawless, capturing a split second where nature turns playful.
The photo was taken by Lee Schofer and posted by his partner, Kate Weyer, on her Facebook.
#NaturePhotography #Plant #Plants #Flower #Flowers #Animal #Animals #Wildlife #WildlifePhotography #Photographer
https://x.com/Sci_Nature0/status/2045886932463304729@eniko just fyi you might want to check the comments on this one, if not the way the droplets look on this versus how you would imagine surface tension and high-speed photography to work -
@eniko just fyi you might want to check the comments on this one, if not the way the droplets look on this versus how you would imagine surface tension and high-speed photography to work
@apophis eugh
-
P pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
