Right in the middle of a rainy moment, a tiny bird becomes the star of something truly magical—a perfect water droplet lands on its head, forming a crown-like splash that feels almost unreal.
-
@dalias @Adrenochrome typing @SynthID in a Gemini message forces a SynthID tool call to execute before the LLM runs. The LLM receives the output from the SynthID checker (a very normal old-school program) + your message as context.
Of course the LLM could still randomly decide to lie about the result of the tool call, that's why I ran this and similar queries multiple times in different chat contexts.
To answer why I'm using an LLM to do this at all: There simply seems to be no other way to reliably use the SynthID checker (sometimes the Google reverse image search executes it and notifies you of a positive but sometimes it also doesn't) , this is the only supported way by Google (even tho I still consider it bad design).
@lynatic @Adrenochrome Exactly, that's the problem. It's taking a somewhat rigorous result, but then passing the output through an LLM which could just alter or replace that result with whatever bullshit it deems statistically plausible.
-
@Adrenochrome this is AI but if this were a surrealist painting it would sure be magical.
The feet along with the branch, the shadows and light simply don't match, hard to notice if you are not trained that alone is enough to tell.@Adrenochrome I'm a graphic designer, I've spent hpurs looking at the smallest details
So 1. The feet are too well focused compared to the branch = fake or poor editing 2. look at the feet one has 3 falanges and the other has 4, one has a nail-finger, the other does not. 3. Shadows come from different directions, plus if it's raining there's most likely no direct sun to cast those shadows. 4. The feathers look like hair = creepy, from a far they do the job but that's... hair. -
@Adrenochrome I'm a graphic designer, I've spent hpurs looking at the smallest details
So 1. The feet are too well focused compared to the branch = fake or poor editing 2. look at the feet one has 3 falanges and the other has 4, one has a nail-finger, the other does not. 3. Shadows come from different directions, plus if it's raining there's most likely no direct sun to cast those shadows. 4. The feathers look like hair = creepy, from a far they do the job but that's... hair.@Adrenochrome 5. Why does the moss look radioactive green? It looks like 1 dollar store fake plants with water. 6. I won't say anything about the dropplet at first sight I thought it was photoshoped but I'm also an engineer and that's not how dropplets work... nor camaras... so yeah.
-
Right in the middle of a rainy moment, a tiny bird becomes the star of something truly magical—a perfect water droplet lands on its head, forming a crown-like splash that feels almost unreal. The timing is flawless, capturing a split second where nature turns playful.
The photo was taken by Lee Schofer and posted by his partner, Kate Weyer, on her Facebook.
#NaturePhotography #Plant #Plants #Flower #Flowers #Animal #Animals #Wildlife #WildlifePhotography #Photographer
https://x.com/Sci_Nature0/status/2045886932463304729@eniko just fyi you might want to check the comments on this one, if not the way the droplets look on this versus how you would imagine surface tension and high-speed photography to work -
@eniko just fyi you might want to check the comments on this one, if not the way the droplets look on this versus how you would imagine surface tension and high-speed photography to work
@apophis eugh
-
P pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
