Stop saying stupid stuff like: "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."
-
Stop saying stupid stuff like:
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."Start saying:
"A free country doesn't track innocent citizens."@Tutanota Saying "If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear" shows a distinct lack of imagination, both when considering things to fear, and things to hide.
-
Stop saying stupid stuff like:
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."Start saying:
"A free country doesn't track innocent citizens."@Tutanota I know someone who used to say that. And now they lost a massive lawsuit recently and in discovery turns out they had lots of massive fraud to hide.
-
Stop saying stupid stuff like:
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."Start saying:
"A free country doesn't track innocent citizens."@Tutanota there is a lot to hide that is nobody else's business, especially if you don't violate the law, and everyone should be able to decide for themselves what they disclose, and those who really harm the people, embezzle data and personal rights, are neither controlled nor punished, it's a crazy world
-
Stop saying stupid stuff like:
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."Start saying:
"A free country doesn't track innocent citizens." -
S simonjust@mstdn.dk shared this topic
-
"I am fine with surveillance, I haven't done anything wrong"
Second person "until someone changes the definition of 'wrong' ." -
I am uncertain if the colored version is AI or not?
How do you tell?
Pascal Bornet appears to be a real person, if not a cartoonist. He shills for AI though.
-
Stop saying stupid stuff like:
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."Start saying:
"A free country doesn't track innocent citizens."@Tutanota You have nothing to fear, if you have nothing to lose.
-
Stop saying stupid stuff like:
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."Start saying:
"A free country doesn't track innocent citizens."@Tutanota "If you have nothing to hide, then keep your fingers crossed that your very existence isn't declared illegal one day."
-
I am uncertain if the colored version is AI or not?
How do you tell?
Pascal Bornet appears to be a real person, if not a cartoonist. He shills for AI though.
@Npars01 Pascal Bornet is an AI pioneer and influencer, so if he is the source, I think it's a save bet to assume AI in this case.
-
I am uncertain if the colored version is AI or not?
How do you tell?
Pascal Bornet appears to be a real person, if not a cartoonist. He shills for AI though.
@Npars01 @orange_lux @Tutanota
If it's got Pascal Bornet's name on it, it's AI.
-
I am uncertain if the colored version is AI or not?
How do you tell?
Pascal Bornet appears to be a real person, if not a cartoonist. He shills for AI though.
@Npars01 @Tutanota there's clearly an AI vibe from the characters (AI generates quite a uniform style that's common for nearly every AI image).
Here, the two main giveaways outside of that are the vertical bar that divides the panel in two : AI has created two panels where one would have sufficed.
Also, the woman has a third hand.
-
@Npars01 @Tutanota there's clearly an AI vibe from the characters (AI generates quite a uniform style that's common for nearly every AI image).
Here, the two main giveaways outside of that are the vertical bar that divides the panel in two : AI has created two panels where one would have sufficed.
Also, the woman has a third hand.
Thanks for catching that!
-
I am uncertain if the colored version is AI or not?
How do you tell?
Pascal Bornet appears to be a real person, if not a cartoonist. He shills for AI though.
@Npars01 @orange_lux @Tutanota Its definitely ai. Look at the womans arms and where here fingers are. Also look at the building behind the pole in the center and how one one side of the pole its one color and on the other its another. Then look at the cameras and how the surface they mount to makes no sense. The mount is not properly parallel to the face or the box it is supposd to be mounted on.
The style itself is a dead giveaway tho.
-
Stop saying stupid stuff like:
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."Start saying:
"A free country doesn't track innocent citizens."i am still on the "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." Just because .. realism?
-
Stop saying stupid stuff like:
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."Start saying:
"A free country doesn't track innocent citizens."@Tutanota OK, I agree with the first part (although I wouldn't characterize it "stupid". It is rather clever propaganda). However, regarding "innocent", what does this even mean, in a world where our privacy and freedom of expression are increasingly shrinking with ever more strict(er) rules about what is considered illegal and what is allowed?
I'd instead go for: " A country that tracks its people en masse is not a free country". -
@Npars01 @orange_lux @Tutanota Its definitely ai. Look at the womans arms and where here fingers are. Also look at the building behind the pole in the center and how one one side of the pole its one color and on the other its another. Then look at the cameras and how the surface they mount to makes no sense. The mount is not properly parallel to the face or the box it is supposd to be mounted on.
The style itself is a dead giveaway tho.
@chaoddity @orange_lux @Tutanota
I'm glad this thread is turning into a public education analysis of how to identify AI slop images.
In Google, this appears first in the image search results.
#PrinceBonesaw's money does information pollution so well.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-06/google-thiel-stand-out-in-saudi-prince-s-silicon-valley-tour -
@Npars01 @Tutanota there's clearly an AI vibe from the characters (AI generates quite a uniform style that's common for nearly every AI image).
Here, the two main giveaways outside of that are the vertical bar that divides the panel in two : AI has created two panels where one would have sufficed.
Also, the woman has a third hand.
@Npars01 @Tutanota but, when checking for the originals : the drawing on the right was made by Ivan Ehlers for LA Taco on July 26.
The AI image has a watermark : "Original Pascal Bornet". It's quite easy to find he's a massive AI bro.
He posted the AI image on his Instagram account on August 19 and of source, as all these AI fuckers, he doesn't give the source.
-
@Npars01 @Tutanota there's clearly an AI vibe from the characters (AI generates quite a uniform style that's common for nearly every AI image).
Here, the two main giveaways outside of that are the vertical bar that divides the panel in two : AI has created two panels where one would have sufficed.
Also, the woman has a third hand.
@orange_lux @Npars01 @Tutanota
I don't know Bornet, but he seems like the kind of guy who would have AI create a marriage proposal, or a eulogy.
-
@chaoddity @orange_lux @Tutanota
I'm glad this thread is turning into a public education analysis of how to identify AI slop images.
In Google, this appears first in the image search results.
#PrinceBonesaw's money does information pollution so well.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-06/google-thiel-stand-out-in-saudi-prince-s-silicon-valley-tour@Npars01 @orange_lux @Tutanota sorry. Just saw the question and thought id answer it.
-
@orange_lux @Npars01 @Tutanota
I don't know Bornet, but he seems like the kind of guy who would have AI create a marriage proposal, or a eulogy.
@rgulick @orange_lux @Tutanota
For techbros, they appear to prefer a virtual world of fake perfection, over a real world of imperfection.
In VR, they are admired by others who flatter them & never face threats to a fragile ego.
A cartoon with a very on point message is copied then "optimized" without consent by the original artist.
