Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Buy it for Life
  3. BIFL cookware (pots & pans) for induction

BIFL cookware (pots & pans) for induction

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Buy it for Life
buyitforlife
72 Indlæg 30 Posters 27 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • N noodles@slrpnk.net

    I think there are two mindsets in BIFL communities that somewhat diametrically oppose each other. There’s the “I’m tired of buying cheap crap that falls apart when I use it; recommend me an economical drop in that I can mildly abuse and it won’t fall apart,” and there’s the “I have some money and want to spend it wisely on really nice stuff that my descendents will fight over because it’s so nice and still going strong.”

    Obviously there are others and it’s a continuum, but I think a lot of people talk past each other because they might recommend e.g. hugely expensive heirloom pans for your great grandkids to admire, when what OP wants is something that can take a beating from randos and still work fine or be recoverable. Or, conversely, someone else might be looking for that recommendation of beautiful sauciers to proudly have on display on their pot rack, and what they’re recommended is crusty thrift-store lodges that they have to refinish themselves.

    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #63

    I think those are where it started from but the BIFL sub degraded into a community built around obsessive buying of the “right” stuff.

    I have a cheap nonstick pan. I use it like five times a year. I’m fine with that. Regular stainless pots and pans will last well over a decade unless you start dropping them on the floor twice a week, even if they’re not as fancy as the stuff that gets advertised as BIFL. It’s not that complicated

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • L This user is from outside of this forum
      L This user is from outside of this forum
      lincolnsdogfido@lemmy.zip
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #64

      No problem! Sorry again for the snark. No one willing to learn should be met with that sort of hostility. Its a relatively new and complicated technology, so it’s not intuitive unless you’re already familiar with it. Instead I should have explained it in a way that garners enthusiasm to explore the principal cause its pretty cool

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • maltfield@slrpnk.netM maltfield@slrpnk.net

        What’s your favorite brand of BIFL cookware for induction?

        I’m looking to upgrade my kitchen with industrial-quality pots and pans. After about a month of searching, I came to the conclusion that the most important requirements are:

        1. 3-ply (or 5-ply). Fully clad (not just the bottom disc).
        2. 18/8 or 18/10 stainless steel on the inside
        3. 18/0 (or 200- or 400-grade) magnetic stainless steel on the outside.
        4. Thick layers of metal (ideally >= 3mm of aluminum)
        5. Strong, serviceable rivets on handles (not welded)
        6. Handles on both sides of the pot (helper handle)
        7. Handles have a hole in them on the end (for hanging)
        8. Fits a 28 cm (or 11”) lid (easily replaceable standard size that’s interchangeable between metric and dumb units)
        9. Top rim should either have a pour spout or flared lip (for easier pouring)
        10. NSF certified

        From what I’ve read, stainless steel isn’t a very good conductor (NIST says that aluminum transfers heat 16x better than stainless steel). But stainless steel is a better surface to cook-on, because it’s less reactive and won’t absorb flavours. So, 3-ply sandwiches a thick aluminum layer between two different types of stainless steel (nickle-free [eg 18/0 or 200- or 400-grade] on the outside, which – though less corrosion resistant – is important for it to work on an induction cooktop) and either 18/8 or 18/10 on the inside.

        5-ply is also a thing, but my research suggests that it doesn’t really matter how many layers. What’s more important is the thickness of the material.

        And that’s why I’m here. Because, confoundedly, the manufacturers of these pots don’t seem to even know how thick the layers of their 3-ply cookware is!

        Ideally I’d just find the technical specifications of their cookware on their website, make a spreadsheet, and then buy the one with the thickest material (or close to the thickest, depending on my trade-off between quality vs weight & cost).

        But I’ve called maybe a dozen manufacturers, and none seem to know the specifications of their own cookware 😞

        So, fediverse, I ask you: does anyone know what the thickness of the layers in these manufacturer’s 3-ply cookware is? Otherwise, what’s been your experience? How do you feel about these brands? Is there some other one (not listed) that you prefer?

        • Browne Thermalloy
        • All-Clad
        • Made-in
        • Tramontina
        • Cuisinart
        • Other?

        Edit: I should be clear that I’m specifically asking about 3-ply or 5-ply stainless steel cookware. This is for a community house, so I need something that can be (ab)used by housemates who don’t know or care for the seasonings on the pans. And I don’t want cast iron, because it’s more likely to break the glass-topped induction cooktop.

        yessikg@fedia.ioY This user is from outside of this forum
        yessikg@fedia.ioY This user is from outside of this forum
        yessikg@fedia.io
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #65

        First of all test your existing cookware with a small magnet, if it sticks it will work with induction. Cuisinart and Tramontina have both been great. I actually prefer using stainless steel because the handles don’t get hot.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • maltfield@slrpnk.netM maltfield@slrpnk.net

          What’s your favorite brand of BIFL cookware for induction?

          I’m looking to upgrade my kitchen with industrial-quality pots and pans. After about a month of searching, I came to the conclusion that the most important requirements are:

          1. 3-ply (or 5-ply). Fully clad (not just the bottom disc).
          2. 18/8 or 18/10 stainless steel on the inside
          3. 18/0 (or 200- or 400-grade) magnetic stainless steel on the outside.
          4. Thick layers of metal (ideally >= 3mm of aluminum)
          5. Strong, serviceable rivets on handles (not welded)
          6. Handles on both sides of the pot (helper handle)
          7. Handles have a hole in them on the end (for hanging)
          8. Fits a 28 cm (or 11”) lid (easily replaceable standard size that’s interchangeable between metric and dumb units)
          9. Top rim should either have a pour spout or flared lip (for easier pouring)
          10. NSF certified

          From what I’ve read, stainless steel isn’t a very good conductor (NIST says that aluminum transfers heat 16x better than stainless steel). But stainless steel is a better surface to cook-on, because it’s less reactive and won’t absorb flavours. So, 3-ply sandwiches a thick aluminum layer between two different types of stainless steel (nickle-free [eg 18/0 or 200- or 400-grade] on the outside, which – though less corrosion resistant – is important for it to work on an induction cooktop) and either 18/8 or 18/10 on the inside.

          5-ply is also a thing, but my research suggests that it doesn’t really matter how many layers. What’s more important is the thickness of the material.

          And that’s why I’m here. Because, confoundedly, the manufacturers of these pots don’t seem to even know how thick the layers of their 3-ply cookware is!

          Ideally I’d just find the technical specifications of their cookware on their website, make a spreadsheet, and then buy the one with the thickest material (or close to the thickest, depending on my trade-off between quality vs weight & cost).

          But I’ve called maybe a dozen manufacturers, and none seem to know the specifications of their own cookware 😞

          So, fediverse, I ask you: does anyone know what the thickness of the layers in these manufacturer’s 3-ply cookware is? Otherwise, what’s been your experience? How do you feel about these brands? Is there some other one (not listed) that you prefer?

          • Browne Thermalloy
          • All-Clad
          • Made-in
          • Tramontina
          • Cuisinart
          • Other?

          Edit: I should be clear that I’m specifically asking about 3-ply or 5-ply stainless steel cookware. This is for a community house, so I need something that can be (ab)used by housemates who don’t know or care for the seasonings on the pans. And I don’t want cast iron, because it’s more likely to break the glass-topped induction cooktop.

          T This user is from outside of this forum
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #66

          I’ve had great luck with Calphalon.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • maltfield@slrpnk.netM maltfield@slrpnk.net

            What’s your favorite brand of BIFL cookware for induction?

            I’m looking to upgrade my kitchen with industrial-quality pots and pans. After about a month of searching, I came to the conclusion that the most important requirements are:

            1. 3-ply (or 5-ply). Fully clad (not just the bottom disc).
            2. 18/8 or 18/10 stainless steel on the inside
            3. 18/0 (or 200- or 400-grade) magnetic stainless steel on the outside.
            4. Thick layers of metal (ideally >= 3mm of aluminum)
            5. Strong, serviceable rivets on handles (not welded)
            6. Handles on both sides of the pot (helper handle)
            7. Handles have a hole in them on the end (for hanging)
            8. Fits a 28 cm (or 11”) lid (easily replaceable standard size that’s interchangeable between metric and dumb units)
            9. Top rim should either have a pour spout or flared lip (for easier pouring)
            10. NSF certified

            From what I’ve read, stainless steel isn’t a very good conductor (NIST says that aluminum transfers heat 16x better than stainless steel). But stainless steel is a better surface to cook-on, because it’s less reactive and won’t absorb flavours. So, 3-ply sandwiches a thick aluminum layer between two different types of stainless steel (nickle-free [eg 18/0 or 200- or 400-grade] on the outside, which – though less corrosion resistant – is important for it to work on an induction cooktop) and either 18/8 or 18/10 on the inside.

            5-ply is also a thing, but my research suggests that it doesn’t really matter how many layers. What’s more important is the thickness of the material.

            And that’s why I’m here. Because, confoundedly, the manufacturers of these pots don’t seem to even know how thick the layers of their 3-ply cookware is!

            Ideally I’d just find the technical specifications of their cookware on their website, make a spreadsheet, and then buy the one with the thickest material (or close to the thickest, depending on my trade-off between quality vs weight & cost).

            But I’ve called maybe a dozen manufacturers, and none seem to know the specifications of their own cookware 😞

            So, fediverse, I ask you: does anyone know what the thickness of the layers in these manufacturer’s 3-ply cookware is? Otherwise, what’s been your experience? How do you feel about these brands? Is there some other one (not listed) that you prefer?

            • Browne Thermalloy
            • All-Clad
            • Made-in
            • Tramontina
            • Cuisinart
            • Other?

            Edit: I should be clear that I’m specifically asking about 3-ply or 5-ply stainless steel cookware. This is for a community house, so I need something that can be (ab)used by housemates who don’t know or care for the seasonings on the pans. And I don’t want cast iron, because it’s more likely to break the glass-topped induction cooktop.

            czardestructo@lemmy.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
            czardestructo@lemmy.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
            czardestructo@lemmy.world
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #67

            I bought a large MadeIn griddle for my induction stove and I have buyers remorse. Its just too thin, too little thermal conduction. It merely cooks in a circle directly over the two coils and no where else. Its bad even with a long pre-heat.

            maltfield@slrpnk.netM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • maltfield@slrpnk.netM maltfield@slrpnk.net

              What’s your favorite brand of BIFL cookware for induction?

              I’m looking to upgrade my kitchen with industrial-quality pots and pans. After about a month of searching, I came to the conclusion that the most important requirements are:

              1. 3-ply (or 5-ply). Fully clad (not just the bottom disc).
              2. 18/8 or 18/10 stainless steel on the inside
              3. 18/0 (or 200- or 400-grade) magnetic stainless steel on the outside.
              4. Thick layers of metal (ideally >= 3mm of aluminum)
              5. Strong, serviceable rivets on handles (not welded)
              6. Handles on both sides of the pot (helper handle)
              7. Handles have a hole in them on the end (for hanging)
              8. Fits a 28 cm (or 11”) lid (easily replaceable standard size that’s interchangeable between metric and dumb units)
              9. Top rim should either have a pour spout or flared lip (for easier pouring)
              10. NSF certified

              From what I’ve read, stainless steel isn’t a very good conductor (NIST says that aluminum transfers heat 16x better than stainless steel). But stainless steel is a better surface to cook-on, because it’s less reactive and won’t absorb flavours. So, 3-ply sandwiches a thick aluminum layer between two different types of stainless steel (nickle-free [eg 18/0 or 200- or 400-grade] on the outside, which – though less corrosion resistant – is important for it to work on an induction cooktop) and either 18/8 or 18/10 on the inside.

              5-ply is also a thing, but my research suggests that it doesn’t really matter how many layers. What’s more important is the thickness of the material.

              And that’s why I’m here. Because, confoundedly, the manufacturers of these pots don’t seem to even know how thick the layers of their 3-ply cookware is!

              Ideally I’d just find the technical specifications of their cookware on their website, make a spreadsheet, and then buy the one with the thickest material (or close to the thickest, depending on my trade-off between quality vs weight & cost).

              But I’ve called maybe a dozen manufacturers, and none seem to know the specifications of their own cookware 😞

              So, fediverse, I ask you: does anyone know what the thickness of the layers in these manufacturer’s 3-ply cookware is? Otherwise, what’s been your experience? How do you feel about these brands? Is there some other one (not listed) that you prefer?

              • Browne Thermalloy
              • All-Clad
              • Made-in
              • Tramontina
              • Cuisinart
              • Other?

              Edit: I should be clear that I’m specifically asking about 3-ply or 5-ply stainless steel cookware. This is for a community house, so I need something that can be (ab)used by housemates who don’t know or care for the seasonings on the pans. And I don’t want cast iron, because it’s more likely to break the glass-topped induction cooktop.

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              budget_biochemist@slrpnk.net
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #68

              I’ve done cooking & baking classes at a community house and we used the Ikea “365” range of stainless steel pots and pans, with metal lids. They’re fairly cheap but induction compatible and stand up to a fair amount of abuse.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • czardestructo@lemmy.worldC czardestructo@lemmy.world

                I bought a large MadeIn griddle for my induction stove and I have buyers remorse. Its just too thin, too little thermal conduction. It merely cooks in a circle directly over the two coils and no where else. Its bad even with a long pre-heat.

                maltfield@slrpnk.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                maltfield@slrpnk.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                maltfield@slrpnk.net
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #69

                What’s the griddle made-of? Does it have aluminum in it?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S solrize@lemmy.ml

                  Regular electric stove, the kind with the resistance coils. I left a pot on top and the contents boiled away and then a big chunk of the pot bottom melted.

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  budget_biochemist@slrpnk.net
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #70

                  Are you sure it was a genuine aluminium pan? The stove would have to be able to reach 933.47 K ​/ 660.32 °C / ​1220.58 °F, which most won’t get anywhere near that. A propane stove might, but an electric stove is unlikely to get so hot.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L lincolnsdogfido@lemmy.zip

                    You’re very wrong. Aluminum does not work with induction. Its not ferrous so it can’t interact with the induction coils. Thats just scientific fact.

                    Many stainless pans do have an aluminum core, but they also have a ferrous metal layer that allows them to be compatible with induction burners. Its not the aluminum thats interacting with the induction top at all. The aluminum is just there for even heat distribution on gas and electric cooktops, or to cut weight and make them more user friendly.

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    budget_biochemist@slrpnk.net
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #71

                    It’s not ferromagnetic but it still interacts with the induction coils - if you’re willing to risk burning out your cooktop through abuse, you can magnetically levitate a ring of aluminum foil on it.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N noodles@slrpnk.net

                      I think there are two mindsets in BIFL communities that somewhat diametrically oppose each other. There’s the “I’m tired of buying cheap crap that falls apart when I use it; recommend me an economical drop in that I can mildly abuse and it won’t fall apart,” and there’s the “I have some money and want to spend it wisely on really nice stuff that my descendents will fight over because it’s so nice and still going strong.”

                      Obviously there are others and it’s a continuum, but I think a lot of people talk past each other because they might recommend e.g. hugely expensive heirloom pans for your great grandkids to admire, when what OP wants is something that can take a beating from randos and still work fine or be recoverable. Or, conversely, someone else might be looking for that recommendation of beautiful sauciers to proudly have on display on their pot rack, and what they’re recommended is crusty thrift-store lodges that they have to refinish themselves.

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      solrize@lemmy.ml
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #72

                      I guess my BIFL concept has always been industrial or military gear that lacks the convenience features of consumer equivalents, is ugly and clanky and weighs a ton, and is indestructable. It’s usually not cheap and the grandkids might not want it, but it will last.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper