Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Star Trek Social Club
  3. Michelle Yeoh Admits “We Could Have Done Better” With ‘Star Trek: Section 31’

Michelle Yeoh Admits “We Could Have Done Better” With ‘Star Trek: Section 31’

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Star Trek Social Club
startrek
22 Indlæg 13 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • hopesdead@startrek.websiteH hopesdead@startrek.website
    This post did not contain any content.
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    buzz86us@lemmy.world
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #12

    Let’s cancel a TV show we just shot several episodes of and edit it into a movie!!

    valuesubtracted@startrek.websiteV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B buzz86us@lemmy.world

      Let’s cancel a TV show we just shot several episodes of and edit it into a movie!!

      valuesubtracted@startrek.websiteV This user is from outside of this forum
      valuesubtracted@startrek.websiteV This user is from outside of this forum
      valuesubtracted@startrek.website
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #13

      The pivot-to-movie happened well before anything was filmed.

      But it does seem like the “pivot” was trying to stuff ten hours of story into a two-hour bag.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • valuesubtracted@startrek.websiteV valuesubtracted@startrek.website

        it was ambiguous, did it really exist? Was it just one crazy guy?

        This was never credible, and was never how it was presented in DS9.

        Even in “Inquisition”, Sloan had two other guys standing next to him, and an entire starship at his disposal. Starfleet Command covered for him at the end - something that was noted by the DS9 senior staff.

        In subsequent episodes, Admiral Ross acknowledged their existence, and Bashir worked out what he believed to be the bare minimum number of operatives required to create the morphogenic virus (73).

        Later, we saw them working for the United Earth Starfleet in the ENT era.

        The only suggestion that it’s just “once crazy guy” comes from Koval, who then helps Sloan fake his death and is revealed to be a S31 asset in the very next scene.

        So no, that’s not really something Discovery changed. People have had to wilfully ignore the DS9 episodes to buy into that theory.

        D This user is from outside of this forum
        D This user is from outside of this forum
        damage@feddit.it
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #14

        Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment. Is it possible that Sloan just blackmailed or forced all those others into following his orders? Yes. Plausible? Eh…
        Still, the point is the mistery, the ambiguity. Barely anyone knows they exist, Sisko, an experienced commander, didn’t know about them. The bigger they make them, the more unbelievable that becomes.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D damage@feddit.it

          Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment. Is it possible that Sloan just blackmailed or forced all those others into following his orders? Yes. Plausible? Eh…
          Still, the point is the mistery, the ambiguity. Barely anyone knows they exist, Sisko, an experienced commander, didn’t know about them. The bigger they make them, the more unbelievable that becomes.

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          steletrovilo@beehaw.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #15

          Nah. DS9 made a big point of showing people doing bad things to accomplish good goals, while always questioning if those were actually good. Nothing about Section 31 is worse than what Sisko does in “In the Pale Moonlight” for example. And after so much about the Tal Shiar, the Obsidian Order, and the actual conspiracies within Starfleet (see STVI, the season finale of TNG season 1, The Pegasus, and Insurrection), Section 31 is not a far stretch at all.

          “Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment.”

          Yes, people are allowed to do that.

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R ragas@lemmy.ml

            Its total bullshit to place a dystopian organisation so close to the center of a utopian society. It basically calls the whole society into question.

            kirk@startrek.websiteK This user is from outside of this forum
            kirk@startrek.websiteK This user is from outside of this forum
            kirk@startrek.website
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #16

            And yet oddly enough that is not the issue with the Section 31 movie

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S steletrovilo@beehaw.org

              Nah. DS9 made a big point of showing people doing bad things to accomplish good goals, while always questioning if those were actually good. Nothing about Section 31 is worse than what Sisko does in “In the Pale Moonlight” for example. And after so much about the Tal Shiar, the Obsidian Order, and the actual conspiracies within Starfleet (see STVI, the season finale of TNG season 1, The Pegasus, and Insurrection), Section 31 is not a far stretch at all.

              “Yeah, way to focus on one part of the comment.”

              Yes, people are allowed to do that.

              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              damage@feddit.it
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #17

              I love DS9 and its grey morality approach, it’s a good contrast to TNG’s attempts at “moral perfection”, and in my comments I didn’t criticize S31’s existence, just that the misterious, barely there approach of DS9 was perfect for that, subsequent stories completely failed to respect the original incarnation, which in my opinion was better, and whose abandonment causes continuity issues

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • observanttrapezium@lemmy.caO observanttrapezium@lemmy.ca

                Understatement of the century

                stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteS This user is from outside of this forum
                stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteS This user is from outside of this forum
                stillpaisleycat@startrek.website
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #18

                This headline is a quote out of context that is being used to imply an admission.

                I don’t mind the inference that the movie wasn’t what Yeoh had hoped it might be, but the headline is a misrepresentation of what she said.

                What Yeoh actually said is:

                Every time I finish a movie or something, I always think, ‘I could have done better,’ so it’s nothing new. That’s how you always have to think to improve yourself and to hopefully be better the next time.

                My partner and I seem to be among the relatively few longtime fans who found the S31 film a blast. I still have to wonder though what we might have got if Kim and Lippoldt had been able to run the show that they originally conceived before Paramount added a male non-Asian action flick show runner ‘for experience’. The episode they wrote for Georgiou in S3 of Discovery was excellent and they have been successful writing on Sweet Tooth for seasons 2&3 since they moved on from Trek…

                observanttrapezium@lemmy.caO 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • kirk@startrek.websiteK kirk@startrek.website

                  And yet oddly enough that is not the issue with the Section 31 movie

                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  ragas@lemmy.ml
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #19

                  Ok, even better that I didn’t watch it then. I had rejected the movie on principle.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • hopesdead@startrek.websiteH hopesdead@startrek.website
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    fixmycode@feddit.clF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fixmycode@feddit.clF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fixmycode@feddit.cl
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #20

                    a lot of hate for the movie in this thread, hate the suits that develop projects based on the success of others instead of going for what has made their brand successful over the years. if they wanted new audiences they could have tried with something original, but the numbers said otherwise.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • stillpaisleycat@startrek.websiteS stillpaisleycat@startrek.website

                      This headline is a quote out of context that is being used to imply an admission.

                      I don’t mind the inference that the movie wasn’t what Yeoh had hoped it might be, but the headline is a misrepresentation of what she said.

                      What Yeoh actually said is:

                      Every time I finish a movie or something, I always think, ‘I could have done better,’ so it’s nothing new. That’s how you always have to think to improve yourself and to hopefully be better the next time.

                      My partner and I seem to be among the relatively few longtime fans who found the S31 film a blast. I still have to wonder though what we might have got if Kim and Lippoldt had been able to run the show that they originally conceived before Paramount added a male non-Asian action flick show runner ‘for experience’. The episode they wrote for Georgiou in S3 of Discovery was excellent and they have been successful writing on Sweet Tooth for seasons 2&3 since they moved on from Trek…

                      observanttrapezium@lemmy.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                      observanttrapezium@lemmy.caO This user is from outside of this forum
                      observanttrapezium@lemmy.ca
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #21

                      Thanks for clarifying. I responded to the title only as I didn’t actually care what Michelle Yeoh thinks and just want to put this sad story into the dustbin of Trekstory. Georgiou was the only mildly interesting character in Discovery and season 2 was the only mildly not-awful one, so I had moderate hopes for that movie.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper