Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. They pay $34 for burgers.

They pay $34 for burgers.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
167 Indlæg 112 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • mekkaokereke@hachyderm.ioM mekkaokereke@hachyderm.io

    They pay $34 for burgers. Should their fire department service be free? Opening a new fire department in one of NYC's richest neighborhoods has some of America's pettiest journalists asking silly questions in headlines again.🤡

    The article acknowledges the fire department analogy, then blows past it.🤷🏿‍♂️

    The solve for "Sometimes when a service like free childcare is available to all, marginalized communities get squeezed out," is "Address that racism."

    It's not "Therefore waste incredible amounts of time and money trying to means test something that society should just make available to all.🤡"

    0f4d0335@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
    0f4d0335@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
    0f4d0335@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #49

    @mekkaokereke journalists gotta eat too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • realtegan@wandering.shopR realtegan@wandering.shop

      @mekkaokereke
      When school lunch programs throw out the "who deserves to get free lunches?" and just provide for every child, the entire program is cheaper due to the lack of an enforcement layer, all children get fed, and children learn more and pay attention better.

      Being overly concerned that someone might get something they don't "deserve" usually ends up screwing over the ones who need help most.

      We're supposed to "promote the general welfare" of the public - not gate-keep who gets help.

      blainecross@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      blainecross@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      blainecross@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #50

      @realtegan @mekkaokereke Free school lunches for all is what Democrats and Gov. Walz did in Minnesota.

      realtegan@wandering.shopR jonm@hachyderm.ioJ michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM wronglang@bayes.clubW 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • blainecross@mastodon.socialB blainecross@mastodon.social

        @realtegan @mekkaokereke Free school lunches for all is what Democrats and Gov. Walz did in Minnesota.

        realtegan@wandering.shopR This user is from outside of this forum
        realtegan@wandering.shopR This user is from outside of this forum
        realtegan@wandering.shop
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #51

        @blainecross @mekkaokereke
        When I saw how well it works locally - the general health of students went up, as well as attendance, grades, and graduation rates - I was completely won over to the idea of free lunches (and breakfasts) for all school children. I cheered when I heard what Walz did in Minnesota.

        paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

          @mekkaokereke I mean the obvious retort is - of course their childcare isn't free. What do you think taxes are?

          rst@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          rst@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          rst@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #52

          @JessTheUnstill @mekkaokereke Also: "If you don't feel that the taxes that rich people pay are enough that they deserve whatever government services they receive, raise their rates until the feeling goes away."

          Funny, by the way, that I never hear this about taxpayer-subsidized facilities used largely by the rich, like, say, Teterboro airport.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • woozle@toot.catW woozle@toot.cat

            @mekkaokereke The "but then rich people get more of it" argument consistently feels like concern-trolling designed to provide an excuse to clamp down on means-testing, which of course makes the problem worse because rich people always have ways to get around bureaucratic obstacles.

            (cf. buying a second house in another school-zone so you don't have to send your kids to the "bad" (underfunded) school.)

            wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
            wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
            wendinoakland@beige.party
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #53

            @woozle @mekkaokereke Espesh since rich people always get more of everything anyway, so wtf? Let it go. 👀

            woozle@toot.catW 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • deirdrebeth@mas.toD deirdrebeth@mas.to

              @Fishercat @mekkaokereke

              Yes, this.

              What part of "universal" does the NYT not understand?

              wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
              wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
              wendinoakland@beige.party
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #54

              @deirdrebeth @Fishercat @mekkaokereke That poor kids might get something that rich kids get.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • realtegan@wandering.shopR realtegan@wandering.shop

                @blainecross @mekkaokereke
                When I saw how well it works locally - the general health of students went up, as well as attendance, grades, and graduation rates - I was completely won over to the idea of free lunches (and breakfasts) for all school children. I cheered when I heard what Walz did in Minnesota.

                paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #55

                @realtegan @blainecross @mekkaokereke

                it's one of the cheapest and most humane ways to raise graduation rates & test scores, lower absenteeism.

                if someone is all bent about "someone taking advantage of free school meals", that tells me more about that person than about problems with the program.

                canevecchio@mastodon.socialC isocat@tiggi.esI 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.comP philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.com

                  @CStamp @realtegan @mekkaokereke Is it even *possible* for anyone (a child in particular) to be undeserving?

                  Seems like a pretty vital assumption that the answer is yes, but I’m not convinced.

                  yenndc@kolektiva.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                  yenndc@kolektiva.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                  yenndc@kolektiva.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #56

                  @philip

                  I *might* be willing to concede that people who can afford to (and do) put effort into keeping others from eating are [themselves undeserving].

                  That's about it tho.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mekkaokereke@hachyderm.ioM mekkaokereke@hachyderm.io

                    They pay $34 for burgers. Should their fire department service be free? Opening a new fire department in one of NYC's richest neighborhoods has some of America's pettiest journalists asking silly questions in headlines again.🤡

                    The article acknowledges the fire department analogy, then blows past it.🤷🏿‍♂️

                    The solve for "Sometimes when a service like free childcare is available to all, marginalized communities get squeezed out," is "Address that racism."

                    It's not "Therefore waste incredible amounts of time and money trying to means test something that society should just make available to all.🤡"

                    ameliabr@front-end.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ameliabr@front-end.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ameliabr@front-end.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #57

                    @mekkaokereke Other relevant ways to reframe the debate:

                    "They pay $34 for burgers. Should their doormen, cooks, nannies, and drivers be able to access free child care conveniently near their workplaces?"

                    and

                    "They pay $34 for burgers. Should they be paying more in property tax, too?"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mekkaokereke@hachyderm.ioM mekkaokereke@hachyderm.io

                      They pay $34 for burgers. Should their fire department service be free? Opening a new fire department in one of NYC's richest neighborhoods has some of America's pettiest journalists asking silly questions in headlines again.🤡

                      The article acknowledges the fire department analogy, then blows past it.🤷🏿‍♂️

                      The solve for "Sometimes when a service like free childcare is available to all, marginalized communities get squeezed out," is "Address that racism."

                      It's not "Therefore waste incredible amounts of time and money trying to means test something that society should just make available to all.🤡"

                      heathborders@hachyderm.ioH This user is from outside of this forum
                      heathborders@hachyderm.ioH This user is from outside of this forum
                      heathborders@hachyderm.io
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #58

                      @mekkaokereke journalists clearly have nothing interesting to cover right now, and the NYT needs to appease the conservatives that kept David Brooks on the payroll for 20+ years 🤦🏻‍♂️

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • blainecross@mastodon.socialB blainecross@mastodon.social

                        @realtegan @mekkaokereke Free school lunches for all is what Democrats and Gov. Walz did in Minnesota.

                        jonm@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jonm@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jonm@hachyderm.io
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #59

                        @realtegan @blainecross @mekkaokereke Philadelphia School District also provides free lunch and breakfast to all students.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • realtegan@wandering.shopR realtegan@wandering.shop

                          @mekkaokereke
                          When school lunch programs throw out the "who deserves to get free lunches?" and just provide for every child, the entire program is cheaper due to the lack of an enforcement layer, all children get fed, and children learn more and pay attention better.

                          Being overly concerned that someone might get something they don't "deserve" usually ends up screwing over the ones who need help most.

                          We're supposed to "promote the general welfare" of the public - not gate-keep who gets help.

                          lovestha@floss.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lovestha@floss.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lovestha@floss.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #60

                          @realtegan @mekkaokereke much easier and better to have progressive taxation than means tested services.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • bipolaron@scholar.socialB bipolaron@scholar.social

                            @realtegan @mekkaokereke this was how it was at all my schools elementary through high school; it sure helps with shame around needing help too. kids should never be made to feel bad about not having money.

                            isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                            isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                            isocat@tiggi.es
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #61

                            And then there's the question of how "food" and "lunch" are defined.

                            I was a gradeschooler in the early-mid '80s, in a rich-to-very-rich suburban U.S. school district. The lunches – not free – were high in processed fat, white starch, sugar, salt, and additives. Hamburgers with a bunch of filler; hot dogs, gas station-spec nachos, "french bread pizza", chikkin nuggets, dubious cheese, boiled-to-death canned vegetables, sugary canned fruit cocktail, etc. Filled up my belly (and enlarged it), but nutrition? LOLnope. I'm sure they've only got worse in the United States of Ketchup Counts As A Vegetable. Oh yeah, they also offered a "brown bag special" at lower cost, which was a couple slices of questionable bologna and a square of plastic cheez with imitation mayonnaise, on white bread.

                            Compare that slop to this what they somehow manage to do in Japan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITzRFAfJsLA

                            @bipolaron @realtegan @mekkaokereke

                            rickf@indieweb.socialR chuffmeister@kolektiva.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • realtegan@wandering.shopR realtegan@wandering.shop

                              @mekkaokereke
                              When school lunch programs throw out the "who deserves to get free lunches?" and just provide for every child, the entire program is cheaper due to the lack of an enforcement layer, all children get fed, and children learn more and pay attention better.

                              Being overly concerned that someone might get something they don't "deserve" usually ends up screwing over the ones who need help most.

                              We're supposed to "promote the general welfare" of the public - not gate-keep who gets help.

                              flup@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                              flup@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                              flup@mastodon.scot
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #62

                              @realtegan Yes! Now do UBI.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

                                @woozle @mekkaokereke Espesh since rich people always get more of everything anyway, so wtf? Let it go. 👀

                                woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                                woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                                woozle@toot.cat
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #63

                                @wendinoakland

                                And, like, they should be paying more than enough taxes to cover the costs of their usage of any public service many times over -- how else to make the budget work when we have such extreme inequality? So sure, they should get the benefits of it too.

                                @mekkaokereke

                                wendinoakland@beige.partyW 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mekkaokereke@hachyderm.ioM mekkaokereke@hachyderm.io

                                  They pay $34 for burgers. Should their fire department service be free? Opening a new fire department in one of NYC's richest neighborhoods has some of America's pettiest journalists asking silly questions in headlines again.🤡

                                  The article acknowledges the fire department analogy, then blows past it.🤷🏿‍♂️

                                  The solve for "Sometimes when a service like free childcare is available to all, marginalized communities get squeezed out," is "Address that racism."

                                  It's not "Therefore waste incredible amounts of time and money trying to means test something that society should just make available to all.🤡"

                                  taatm@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  taatm@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  taatm@mathstodon.xyz
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #64

                                  @mekkaokereke
                                  Perfect! 👌🏻

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • woozle@toot.catW woozle@toot.cat

                                    @wendinoakland

                                    And, like, they should be paying more than enough taxes to cover the costs of their usage of any public service many times over -- how else to make the budget work when we have such extreme inequality? So sure, they should get the benefits of it too.

                                    @mekkaokereke

                                    wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    wendinoakland@beige.partyW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    wendinoakland@beige.party
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #65

                                    @woozle @mekkaokereke Their attitude is always, why should the poors get something they don’t pay for? In truth the lower & working classes pay most of the taxes.

                                    woozle@toot.catW 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • wendinoakland@beige.partyW wendinoakland@beige.party

                                      @woozle @mekkaokereke Their attitude is always, why should the poors get something they don’t pay for? In truth the lower & working classes pay most of the taxes.

                                      woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      woozle@toot.catW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      woozle@toot.cat
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #66

                                      @wendinoakland

                                      I just wanna smack anyone who makes that argument in all seriousness.

                                      Like omg people, do you want a civilization or not??? 😡

                                      @mekkaokereke

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • steve@social.coopS steve@social.coop

                                        @CStamp @realtegan @mekkaokereke
                                        “Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.”
                                        ― Adam Smith

                                        "The primary function of government is to protect the minority of the opulent from the majority of the poor."
                                        - James Madison

                                        adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        adrianriskin@kolektiva.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #67

                                        @Steve @CStamp @realtegan @mekkaokereke

                                        And at least Madison thought this was a feature rather than a bug. In fact Madison's obsessive worry that in a democracy the majority of the poor might vote in laws that would protect them from capitalist predation, which after all is how he and his founding buddies made their dough, is why we have a republic rather than a democracy. He lays it all out in the open in Federalist 10.

                                        https://billofrightsinstitute.org/primary-sources/federalist-no-10/

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • realtegan@wandering.shopR realtegan@wandering.shop

                                          @mekkaokereke
                                          When school lunch programs throw out the "who deserves to get free lunches?" and just provide for every child, the entire program is cheaper due to the lack of an enforcement layer, all children get fed, and children learn more and pay attention better.

                                          Being overly concerned that someone might get something they don't "deserve" usually ends up screwing over the ones who need help most.

                                          We're supposed to "promote the general welfare" of the public - not gate-keep who gets help.

                                          darkphoenix@universeodon.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          darkphoenix@universeodon.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          darkphoenix@universeodon.com
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #68

                                          @realtegan @mekkaokereke yeah, we have a serious shortage of promoting the general welfare.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper