To opt out, just don't have a face

[brokar@mastodon.social]

@drwho @kbal @pluralistic

The people are doing it for them. And even paying for it, so the government doesn't have to. Check out how many Ring cameras are out there. Police is known to access them whenever there is something going on in the neighborhood.
Put some facial recognition software on it and you're set. No need to even announce it.

[ukeleleeric@mstdn.social]

@pluralistic so, how come there's no legal requirement to be on it, but you can't opt out?

[mercurial@todon.nl]

@eLearningTechie @pluralistic and does anyone remember what happened in silence of the lambs? Wasn’t that the movie where he got plastic surgery for a whole new face

[davidtheeviloverlord@mastodon.social]

@pluralistic

I find your lack of face disturbing.

[rhodium103@mastodon.social]

@pluralistic
"Are you proud of yourselves?" would be an interesting question to ask, but that would require the sort of self-reflection that the Met Police certainly select against.

[horqua@mastodon.social]

@pluralistic Wear a mirror!

[laukidh@infosec.exchange]

@RaymondPierreL3 @terribletowelie no kidding, I’m about to block everyone who put this on my timeline

[pamela1960@kolektiva.social]

@pluralistic Or wear a mask.

[m@martinh.net]

@matthewcroughan @pluralistic @angusm Just realised that my silly idea of a QR code based memetic hazard for "facial recognition" AIs is... a sort of Reverse Scorpion Stare

[dougiec3@libretooth.gr]

@SeanPLynch @pluralistic
Nice!

[qbitzerre@unbound.social]

@Netraven @pluralistic I'd recognize that face anywhere

[jscybersec@infosec.exchange]

@Netraven @pluralistic Just slap a couple rando license plate stickers on and you're suddenly a car.