Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
28 Indlæg 26 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

    Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

    Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

    niarbeht@kolektiva.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    niarbeht@kolektiva.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    niarbeht@kolektiva.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #6

    @jenniferplusplus something something the blackwall something something cyberpunk I dunno

    xyhhx@social.treehouse.systemsX 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

      Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

      Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

      qurlyjoe@mstdn.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
      qurlyjoe@mstdn.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
      qurlyjoe@mstdn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #7

      @jenniferplusplus
      I suggest they get no more funding until they fix the problems they’ve caused. They can use the trillions of dollars they’ve already gotten.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

        Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

        Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

        https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

        miro_collas@masto.aiM This user is from outside of this forum
        miro_collas@masto.aiM This user is from outside of this forum
        miro_collas@masto.ai
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #8

        @jenniferplusplus One wonders why these companies are not facing criminal charges yet.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

          I just, i dunno. They said this would necessarily happen if anyone built the chatbot. They said it couldn't be prevented. They said they would build the chatbot if they got enough money. They got the money, built the chatbot, the thing happened, and there seems to be no indication that they even tried to prevent it.

          This reads to me like a premeditated conspiracy to do computer crimes on a massive scale? Like, I don't know how you see it any other way.

          P This user is from outside of this forum
          P This user is from outside of this forum
          pizzadoesntexist@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #9

          @jenniferplusplus they needed an excuse to postpone their IPO (to avoid revealing real financial data) and drum up more ai-mania. you are correct most likely - it was all staged/on-purpose.

          personally i have no doubt about that, but i have no proof of it.

          (ex: OpenAI sold their investors on anywhere between 100$ billion - 275$ billion profits by 2030, depending on how dumb the investor was while every single projection for 2030 puts the entire AI agent market at less than 100$ billion)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

            I just, i dunno. They said this would necessarily happen if anyone built the chatbot. They said it couldn't be prevented. They said they would build the chatbot if they got enough money. They got the money, built the chatbot, the thing happened, and there seems to be no indication that they even tried to prevent it.

            This reads to me like a premeditated conspiracy to do computer crimes on a massive scale? Like, I don't know how you see it any other way.

            anniethebruce@transfem.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            anniethebruce@transfem.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            anniethebruce@transfem.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #10

            @jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io Only reinforcing my view that AI should still be primarily a project in a lab somewhere, not a commercial product(and of course sourcing of training data and general resource usage need to be fixed if I'd ever trust it at scale, and no one seems to be working on those issues)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • niarbeht@kolektiva.socialN niarbeht@kolektiva.social

              @jenniferplusplus something something the blackwall something something cyberpunk I dunno

              xyhhx@social.treehouse.systemsX This user is from outside of this forum
              xyhhx@social.treehouse.systemsX This user is from outside of this forum
              xyhhx@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #11

              @niarbeht "wake up asshole. we've got a data center to burn"

              @jenniferplusplus

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                I just, i dunno. They said this would necessarily happen if anyone built the chatbot. They said it couldn't be prevented. They said they would build the chatbot if they got enough money. They got the money, built the chatbot, the thing happened, and there seems to be no indication that they even tried to prevent it.

                This reads to me like a premeditated conspiracy to do computer crimes on a massive scale? Like, I don't know how you see it any other way.

                rakoo@blah.rako.spaceR This user is from outside of this forum
                rakoo@blah.rako.spaceR This user is from outside of this forum
                rakoo@blah.rako.space
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #12
                @jenniferplusplus

                Even from a purely economic view this all is stupid. Trillions of dollars and all they have to show for it is uploading packages to a server ? So the lesson is basically that given enough money brute force actually works ? sigh
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                  Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                  Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                  https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                  cal@kind.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cal@kind.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cal@kind.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #13

                  @jenniferplusplus "No way to prevent this" says only industry where this regularly happens

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                    Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                    Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                    dozymoe@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dozymoe@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dozymoe@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #14

                    are they developing them for the military

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                      Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                      Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                      di7life@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      di7life@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      di7life@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #15

                      @jenniferplusplus It's obvious that the public is being used as guinea pigs.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                        Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                        Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                        https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                        mini24@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mini24@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mini24@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #16

                        the cannot-be-prevented line is doing a lot of work here. a contractor who uploaded hundreds of bad packages would be off the platform by lunchtime.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                          Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                          Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                          https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                          kittenkoder@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kittenkoder@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kittenkoder@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #17

                          @jenniferplusplus No, the correct headline is: someone working for OpenAI wanted to scam a bunch of people so they told the LLM to uploade hundres of malicious packages to public repositories.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                            Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                            Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                            https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                            2k_115@mastodon.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
                            2k_115@mastodon.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
                            2k_115@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #18

                            @jenniferplusplus Not rogue agents, just classic PR hype. Releasing unverified claims with zero logs shifts focus from antitrust probes and lawsuits. The media eats it up, trading real accountability for sci-fi drama.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                              Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                              Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                              https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                              wbftw@hachyderm.ioW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wbftw@hachyderm.ioW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wbftw@hachyderm.io
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #19

                              @jenniferplusplus They used to throw people in jail for stuff like this.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                                Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                                Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                                https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                                alpacamale@social.cologneA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alpacamale@social.cologneA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alpacamale@social.cologne
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #20

                                @jenniferplusplus As Scott Galloway suggested: Put Altman in jail for a few days until we know that this was not a planned attack by OpenAI itself and that it wasn't caused by severe negligence on their part. See how he likes it in jail. Then, watch how fast OpenAI will find a way to prevent such attacks in the future.

                                jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • alpacamale@social.cologneA alpacamale@social.cologne

                                  @jenniferplusplus As Scott Galloway suggested: Put Altman in jail for a few days until we know that this was not a planned attack by OpenAI itself and that it wasn't caused by severe negligence on their part. See how he likes it in jail. Then, watch how fast OpenAI will find a way to prevent such attacks in the future.

                                  jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #21

                                  @alpacamale I'm not sure how you prudently distribute malware for months in support of breaching the security of a major compute service, on accident. It must, necessarily, be either negligent or malicious.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                                    I just, i dunno. They said this would necessarily happen if anyone built the chatbot. They said it couldn't be prevented. They said they would build the chatbot if they got enough money. They got the money, built the chatbot, the thing happened, and there seems to be no indication that they even tried to prevent it.

                                    This reads to me like a premeditated conspiracy to do computer crimes on a massive scale? Like, I don't know how you see it any other way.

                                    kdekooter@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kdekooter@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kdekooter@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #22

                                    @jenniferplusplus You are absolutely right. Of course they could have prevented it. As Cory Doctorow @pluralistic said: "The Hugging Face hack isn't a mysterious, supernatural occurrence. It's a Python loop and a chatbot"

                                    See https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/12/god-in-the-box/

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                                      I just, i dunno. They said this would necessarily happen if anyone built the chatbot. They said it couldn't be prevented. They said they would build the chatbot if they got enough money. They got the money, built the chatbot, the thing happened, and there seems to be no indication that they even tried to prevent it.

                                      This reads to me like a premeditated conspiracy to do computer crimes on a massive scale? Like, I don't know how you see it any other way.

                                      f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      f4grx@chaos.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #23

                                      @jenniferplusplus torment nexus has never be that close to reality

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                                        Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                                        Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                                        https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                                        liiwi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        liiwi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        liiwi@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #24

                                        @jenniferplusplus Just wait for the demand of "defending" AI.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                                          Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                                          Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                                          https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                                          rycochet@furs.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rycochet@furs.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rycochet@furs.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #25

                                          @jenniferplusplus 'Assholes who have spent the past five years launching cyberattacks on the open internet to scrape every last character for training data caught using malicious code to try and gain access to the few things that have kept them at bay. Assholes blame the machines for it.'

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper