Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
28 Indlæg 26 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

    Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

    Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

    wbftw@hachyderm.ioW This user is from outside of this forum
    wbftw@hachyderm.ioW This user is from outside of this forum
    wbftw@hachyderm.io
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #19

    @jenniferplusplus They used to throw people in jail for stuff like this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

      Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

      Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

      alpacamale@social.cologneA This user is from outside of this forum
      alpacamale@social.cologneA This user is from outside of this forum
      alpacamale@social.cologne
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #20

      @jenniferplusplus As Scott Galloway suggested: Put Altman in jail for a few days until we know that this was not a planned attack by OpenAI itself and that it wasn't caused by severe negligence on their part. See how he likes it in jail. Then, watch how fast OpenAI will find a way to prevent such attacks in the future.

      jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • alpacamale@social.cologneA alpacamale@social.cologne

        @jenniferplusplus As Scott Galloway suggested: Put Altman in jail for a few days until we know that this was not a planned attack by OpenAI itself and that it wasn't caused by severe negligence on their part. See how he likes it in jail. Then, watch how fast OpenAI will find a way to prevent such attacks in the future.

        jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #21

        @alpacamale I'm not sure how you prudently distribute malware for months in support of breaching the security of a major compute service, on accident. It must, necessarily, be either negligent or malicious.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

          I just, i dunno. They said this would necessarily happen if anyone built the chatbot. They said it couldn't be prevented. They said they would build the chatbot if they got enough money. They got the money, built the chatbot, the thing happened, and there seems to be no indication that they even tried to prevent it.

          This reads to me like a premeditated conspiracy to do computer crimes on a massive scale? Like, I don't know how you see it any other way.

          kdekooter@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kdekooter@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kdekooter@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #22

          @jenniferplusplus You are absolutely right. Of course they could have prevented it. As Cory Doctorow @pluralistic said: "The Hugging Face hack isn't a mysterious, supernatural occurrence. It's a Python loop and a chatbot"

          See https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/12/god-in-the-box/

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

            I just, i dunno. They said this would necessarily happen if anyone built the chatbot. They said it couldn't be prevented. They said they would build the chatbot if they got enough money. They got the money, built the chatbot, the thing happened, and there seems to be no indication that they even tried to prevent it.

            This reads to me like a premeditated conspiracy to do computer crimes on a massive scale? Like, I don't know how you see it any other way.

            f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            f4grx@chaos.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #23

            @jenniferplusplus torment nexus has never be that close to reality

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

              Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

              Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

              https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

              liiwi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              liiwi@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              liiwi@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #24

              @jenniferplusplus Just wait for the demand of "defending" AI.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                rycochet@furs.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                rycochet@furs.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                rycochet@furs.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #25

                @jenniferplusplus 'Assholes who have spent the past five years launching cyberattacks on the open internet to scrape every last character for training data caught using malicious code to try and gain access to the few things that have kept them at bay. Assholes blame the machines for it.'

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                  I just, i dunno. They said this would necessarily happen if anyone built the chatbot. They said it couldn't be prevented. They said they would build the chatbot if they got enough money. They got the money, built the chatbot, the thing happened, and there seems to be no indication that they even tried to prevent it.

                  This reads to me like a premeditated conspiracy to do computer crimes on a massive scale? Like, I don't know how you see it any other way.

                  brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  brouhaha@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #26

                  @jenniferplusplus
                  It would have been absolutely TRIVIAL for them to prevent it. They could simply have never powered up their data centers. Better yet, never have built them in the first place. They would have saved a ton of money, too. It would have been a win all around!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                    I just, i dunno. They said this would necessarily happen if anyone built the chatbot. They said it couldn't be prevented. They said they would build the chatbot if they got enough money. They got the money, built the chatbot, the thing happened, and there seems to be no indication that they even tried to prevent it.

                    This reads to me like a premeditated conspiracy to do computer crimes on a massive scale? Like, I don't know how you see it any other way.

                    bladecoder@androiddev.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bladecoder@androiddev.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bladecoder@androiddev.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #27

                    @jenniferplusplus It seems that AI companies are now competing for who's going to cause the most damage.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                      Corrected headline: OpenAI uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to public repository, claims it was an accident and can't be prevented

                      Subhead: we gave them a trillion dollars so they could do this

                      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/11/openai-agents-rubygems-malicious-packages

                      ghostrunner@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ghostrunner@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ghostrunner@hachyderm.io
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #28

                      @jenniferplusplus "Guns dont kill people, people kill people" but also "i sowwize, my trillion dollar pile of theft keeps breaking the law under my guidance, nothing to be done about it"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • simonjust@mstdn.dkS simonjust@mstdn.dk shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper