Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful!

When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful!

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
127 Indlæg 52 Posters 17 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

    @ammdias Exactly. And with V2G (Vehicle To Grid) solutions they can give back around 10-15% of their stored energy to the grid when needed, without sacrificing too much range. These are the kind of tools I think about when I say a self-balancing, decentralised grid. @eoinho

    the_sun@solarcene.communityT This user is from outside of this forum
    the_sun@solarcene.communityT This user is from outside of this forum
    the_sun@solarcene.community
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #22

    @jwildeboer @ammdias @eoinho

    Meanwhile, in Australia, with the highest penetration of rooftop solar in the world:

    "The installation of home batteries in Australia in the month of March accounts for around 10 per cent of global grid scale battery installations, an extraordinary number."

    Then we are giving away 3 free hours of electricity in the middle of the day, to use up some of the curtailed large scale electricity and shift energy from coal powered off peak.

    etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • f4grx@chaos.socialF f4grx@chaos.social

      @jwildeboer the grid frequency stability need huge rotating machines with lots of inertia so we cant stop these too much in case of renewable surplus. This is an issue that could be technically fixed but IDK if we have that much workarounds for that right now.

      derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      derunglaublichefalk@chaos.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #23

      @f4grx @jwildeboer

      actually exact this concept can be used for storing surplus energy and frequency stabilization.just search for Flywheel storage (Schwungradspeicher)

      f4grx@chaos.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

        @valhalla The current incentive system (at least here in the EU) is completely wrong, though. In times of excess electricity from renewables, you are forced to shut wind/solar down and the electricity companies then have to pay you for NOT generating electricity. This disincentivizes from building storage capacities that would allow for better capture and use of renewable electricity. Things are changing, though.

        valhalla@social.gl-como.itV This user is from outside of this forum
        valhalla@social.gl-como.itV This user is from outside of this forum
        valhalla@social.gl-como.it
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #24

        @jwildeboer yeah, I suspect that the incentive system is lagging behind reality by a few years, and needs to be brought up to date.

        At least for smaller, home-sized plants, now the incentive is in favour of having batteries (it is here in Italy, I don't know elsewhere in EU), but I suspect that as a system it has a bit less inertia than that of bigger plants.

        jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • valhalla@social.gl-como.itV valhalla@social.gl-como.it

          @jwildeboer yeah, I suspect that the incentive system is lagging behind reality by a few years, and needs to be brought up to date.

          At least for smaller, home-sized plants, now the incentive is in favour of having batteries (it is here in Italy, I don't know elsewhere in EU), but I suspect that as a system it has a bit less inertia than that of bigger plants.

          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #25

          @valhalla And you are perfectly right. When more and more private homes reduce their dependency on the grid by installing solar and batteries, that is a bottom-up approach that will change policy over time. And it shows you that electricity can be more of a flat rate system, where the infrastructure cost is shared, but electricity itself is more less for free for domestic settings. Industry consumption of electricity is a very different thing.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD derunglaublichefalk@chaos.social

            @f4grx @jwildeboer

            actually exact this concept can be used for storing surplus energy and frequency stabilization.just search for Flywheel storage (Schwungradspeicher)

            f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            f4grx@chaos.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #26

            @derunglaublichefalk @jwildeboer I know flywheel are a thing but is this scalable to country/continent size and when?

            jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • f4grx@chaos.socialF f4grx@chaos.social

              @derunglaublichefalk @jwildeboer I know flywheel are a thing but is this scalable to country/continent size and when?

              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #27

              @f4grx Batteries are cheaper and readily available. And store less mechanical energy 😉 It's always surprsing to see how many people ignore the obvious solutions and focus on techno phantasies instead 🙂 Fusion energy, anyone? 😉@derunglaublichefalk

              derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD f4grx@chaos.socialF 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • reinald@nrw.socialR reinald@nrw.social

                @jwildeboer all capitalism works on scarcity. We need to transform into a system of abundance, and energy might be a first sector where it starts.

                jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #28

                @Reinald There's real scarcity and artificial scarcity. I dare say that the whole digital/internet business is based on artificial scarcity, where we accept things like Digital Rights Management to keep the reality of abundance more or less a secret.

                reinald@nrw.socialR openrisk@mastodon.socialO simo5@fosstodon.orgS shsbxheb@mstdn.socialS 4 Replies Last reply
                0
                • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                  When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                  krijnsoeteman@mastodon.nlK This user is from outside of this forum
                  krijnsoeteman@mastodon.nlK This user is from outside of this forum
                  krijnsoeteman@mastodon.nl
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #29

                  @jwildeboer ik ben vooral ook verbaasd over de bizarre manier hoe gekeken wordt door veel Nederlanders over het afschaffen van de saldering. Met dank aan bepaalde schreeuw-media en het daarna overnemen van hetzelfde narratief door de rest.. en dan allemaal boze middelbare mannen (vooral) die echt heel goed verdienen. Brr

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                    @f4grx Batteries are cheaper and readily available. And store less mechanical energy 😉 It's always surprsing to see how many people ignore the obvious solutions and focus on techno phantasies instead 🙂 Fusion energy, anyone? 😉@derunglaublichefalk

                    derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    derunglaublichefalk@chaos.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #30

                    @jwildeboer
                    since I'm no expert, i don't know if this has a valid use case, is just interesting, maybe already used or a techno phantasy. I just read some stuff years ago (but different sources and projects) on that tech and it was more plausible than let's say nuclear fusion power plant.
                    @f4grx

                    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD derunglaublichefalk@chaos.social

                      @jwildeboer
                      since I'm no expert, i don't know if this has a valid use case, is just interesting, maybe already used or a techno phantasy. I just read some stuff years ago (but different sources and projects) on that tech and it was more plausible than let's say nuclear fusion power plant.
                      @f4grx

                      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #31

                      @derunglaublichefalk The idea of energy storage in flywheels sounds good. But in practice you talk about mechanical elements that will degrade over time, making the practical use complicated as you have to take into account mechanical failure and the huge amount of kinetic energy stored in a flywheel that can lead to catastrophic damage when things get out of whack. It has been tried several times, but never emerged as sustainable solution. @f4grx

                      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ f4grx@chaos.socialF 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD derunglaublichefalk@chaos.social

                        @jwildeboer
                        since I'm no expert, i don't know if this has a valid use case, is just interesting, maybe already used or a techno phantasy. I just read some stuff years ago (but different sources and projects) on that tech and it was more plausible than let's say nuclear fusion power plant.
                        @f4grx

                        derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        derunglaublichefalk@chaos.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        derunglaublichefalk@chaos.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #32

                        @jwildeboer @f4grx
                        as far as I remember the argument was a very high discharge current.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                          @derunglaublichefalk The idea of energy storage in flywheels sounds good. But in practice you talk about mechanical elements that will degrade over time, making the practical use complicated as you have to take into account mechanical failure and the huge amount of kinetic energy stored in a flywheel that can lead to catastrophic damage when things get out of whack. It has been tried several times, but never emerged as sustainable solution. @f4grx

                          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #33

                          @derunglaublichefalk There are other principles that do better, though. Hot sand is as thermal energy storage is one of them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_energy_storage @f4grx

                          f4grx@chaos.socialF cm@chaos.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                            When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                            holdenweb@freeradical.zoneH This user is from outside of this forum
                            holdenweb@freeradical.zoneH This user is from outside of this forum
                            holdenweb@freeradical.zone
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #34

                            @jwildeboer @linjari We have!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                              When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                              peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              peter_slwk@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #35

                              @jwildeboer So so so right.

                              Just imagine immediately after pulling fossil sources from the ground we burn it to generate power. Then complain we have to much power available and should stop drilling and pumping.

                              We've been storing fossil for decades and don't find that strange at all. So why is storing renewables so difficult or strange?

                              Well, because if we store it, we can use it when renewables are scarce (night / no wind) and the fossil/nuclear lobby really doesn't want that to happen.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                @f4grx Batteries are cheaper and readily available. And store less mechanical energy 😉 It's always surprsing to see how many people ignore the obvious solutions and focus on techno phantasies instead 🙂 Fusion energy, anyone? 😉@derunglaublichefalk

                                f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                f4grx@chaos.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #36

                                @jwildeboer @derunglaublichefalk I have absolutely no fantasy, quite the contrary, I just know that accurate grid frequency management is extremely complex and that it cant be done reliably with solid state devices. I could change my mind by reading convincing elements that describe how to do it in a way I understand.

                                rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR cm@chaos.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • valhalla@social.gl-como.itV valhalla@social.gl-como.it

                                  @lechimp @jwildeboer I knew I was doing it wrong when my new solar panels started to produce more than I was using this late winter, but could still not push energy to the grid (here in Italy there is a couple months wait between the installation of the panels and the installation of the proper meter)!

                                  I should have baked cake! not ironed clothing!

                                  (to be fair, most of my cake recipes require some hours of advance planning, ironing clothing was the thing I could do on demand. and I still needed to do it.)

                                  lechimp@mastodon.pub.solarL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lechimp@mastodon.pub.solarL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lechimp@mastodon.pub.solar
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #37

                                  @valhalla @jwildeboer ironing clothing should be fine as well 😃

                                  valhalla@social.gl-como.itV 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mike@fosstodon.orgM mike@fosstodon.org

                                    @jwildeboer I'm constantly amazed by this. I live in Arizona (in the United States). It's a desert where 115F (46C) is common. The sun beats down on us to the point being without AC can be a death sentence, and you'd be shocked at the number of people here who have only negative opinions of solar power. It should be ubiquitous. Every structure should be lined with it with batteries in every building. It's just not the case, and it's nothing short of flabbergasting.

                                    mwt@mastodon.nzM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mwt@mastodon.nzM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mwt@mastodon.nz
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #38

                                    @mike @jwildeboer
                                    Billboard campaign idea: "Why buy energy from far away at extortionate prices when you can harvest it directly from the sky?"

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                      @derunglaublichefalk The idea of energy storage in flywheels sounds good. But in practice you talk about mechanical elements that will degrade over time, making the practical use complicated as you have to take into account mechanical failure and the huge amount of kinetic energy stored in a flywheel that can lead to catastrophic damage when things get out of whack. It has been tried several times, but never emerged as sustainable solution. @f4grx

                                      f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      f4grx@chaos.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #39

                                      @jwildeboer @derunglaublichefalk I know that, so I wonder how to keep the grid sync without these.

                                      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                        @phf I know it is technically unfeasible to do this. But we need to keep on thinking about ways to make our planet healthier. It's the only one we have. But using renewables for desalination plants to produce drinking water that can also be used for agriculture in desert regions is not that much science fiction 🙂

                                        danielsreichenbach@mastodon.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        danielsreichenbach@mastodon.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        danielsreichenbach@mastodon.world
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #40

                                        @jwildeboer @phf if we used all the fossil fuel subsidies handed out all over the world and put that into renewables and cleaning up the planet, we would make some remarkable progress. Considering all the possibilities we have, one must assume the majority doesn't want a clean, liveable world. Or is too busy with survival to consider it?!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                          @derunglaublichefalk There are other principles that do better, though. Hot sand is as thermal energy storage is one of them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_energy_storage @f4grx

                                          f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          f4grx@chaos.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #41

                                          @jwildeboer @derunglaublichefalk ah, if they describe hundreds of megawatts for several hours, it's starting to become considerable. Interesting.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper