Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. As a software developer who took an elective in neural networks - when people call LLMs stochastic parrots, that's not criticism of their results.

As a software developer who took an elective in neural networks - when people call LLMs stochastic parrots, that's not criticism of their results.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
2 Indlæg 2 Posters 5 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • leeloo@chaosfem.twL This user is from outside of this forum
    leeloo@chaosfem.twL This user is from outside of this forum
    leeloo@chaosfem.tw
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    As a software developer who took an elective in neural networks - when people call LLMs stochastic parrots, that's not criticism of their results.

    It's literally a description of how they work.

    The so-called training data is used to build a huge database of words and the probability of them fitting together.

    Stochastic because the whole thing is statistics.
    Parrot because the answer is just repeating the most probable word combinations from its training dataset.

    Calling an LLM a stochastic parrot is lile calling a car a motorised vehicle with wheels. It doesn't say anything about cars being good or bad. It does, however, take away the magic. So if you feel a need to defend AI when you hear the term stochastic parrot, consider that you may have elevated them to a god-like status, and that's why you go on the defense when the magic is dispelled.

    lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • leeloo@chaosfem.twL leeloo@chaosfem.tw

      As a software developer who took an elective in neural networks - when people call LLMs stochastic parrots, that's not criticism of their results.

      It's literally a description of how they work.

      The so-called training data is used to build a huge database of words and the probability of them fitting together.

      Stochastic because the whole thing is statistics.
      Parrot because the answer is just repeating the most probable word combinations from its training dataset.

      Calling an LLM a stochastic parrot is lile calling a car a motorised vehicle with wheels. It doesn't say anything about cars being good or bad. It does, however, take away the magic. So if you feel a need to defend AI when you hear the term stochastic parrot, consider that you may have elevated them to a god-like status, and that's why you go on the defense when the magic is dispelled.

      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @leeloo i just think it's unfair to parrots 😉

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
      Svar
      • Svar som emne
      Login for at svare
      • Ældste til nyeste
      • Nyeste til ældste
      • Most Votes


      • Log ind

      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      Graciously hosted by data.coop
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Hjem
      • Seneste
      • Etiketter
      • Populære
      • Verden
      • Bruger
      • Grupper