Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I used a Norwegian open-source tool to analyze my old Spotify data as a customer.

I used a Norwegian open-source tool to analyze my old Spotify data as a customer.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
spotifybigtechmusic
84 Indlæg 36 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • lislegaard@sonomu.clubL lislegaard@sonomu.club

    I used a Norwegian open-source tool to analyze my old Spotify data as a customer.

    I don't use Spotify anymore, but I can announce that of all the money I ever paid them, approx. 5% went to the artists I listened to.

    That is a pretty insane transfer of wealth from the bottom / middle to the top if you ask me.

    I already knew Spotify is a big scam for those not at the top, but seeing the numbers still gives me a bodily reaction. 😢

    #spotify #bigtech #music

    nick@social.smplfi.comN This user is from outside of this forum
    nick@social.smplfi.comN This user is from outside of this forum
    nick@social.smplfi.com
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #81

    @lislegaard It makes no sense that the percentage of revenue should change based on the popularity of a particular artist. I think all companies should be transparent about their revenue split, and whenever they aren’t, I presume it’s malicious.

    lislegaard@sonomu.clubL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nick@social.smplfi.comN nick@social.smplfi.com

      @lislegaard It makes no sense that the percentage of revenue should change based on the popularity of a particular artist. I think all companies should be transparent about their revenue split, and whenever they aren’t, I presume it’s malicious.

      lislegaard@sonomu.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
      lislegaard@sonomu.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
      lislegaard@sonomu.club
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #82

      @nick

      yup! still we as a society got conned into using it! but it should be regulated. same with the rest of big tech, but we'll see what happens. maybe we see a split where only major label artists and slop is on the big streamers and all independent music is elsewhere. but it has been 20 years of this shit company now...

      nick@social.smplfi.comN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • lislegaard@sonomu.clubL lislegaard@sonomu.club

        @nick

        yup! still we as a society got conned into using it! but it should be regulated. same with the rest of big tech, but we'll see what happens. maybe we see a split where only major label artists and slop is on the big streamers and all independent music is elsewhere. but it has been 20 years of this shit company now...

        nick@social.smplfi.comN This user is from outside of this forum
        nick@social.smplfi.comN This user is from outside of this forum
        nick@social.smplfi.com
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #83

        @lislegaard hopefully the answer is decentralization, more drm free content on indie websites, and direct to creator revenue. So much of the current ecosystem is based around the presumption of “protecting” revenue (from piracy, misattribution, etc.) but if 95% is going to the middlemen, how much is actually being protected? I’d rather build a better experience for my fans and make providing support as frictionless as possible.

        lislegaard@sonomu.clubL 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nick@social.smplfi.comN nick@social.smplfi.com

          @lislegaard hopefully the answer is decentralization, more drm free content on indie websites, and direct to creator revenue. So much of the current ecosystem is based around the presumption of “protecting” revenue (from piracy, misattribution, etc.) but if 95% is going to the middlemen, how much is actually being protected? I’d rather build a better experience for my fans and make providing support as frictionless as possible.

          lislegaard@sonomu.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
          lislegaard@sonomu.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
          lislegaard@sonomu.club
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #84

          @nick

          yeah and in this case "the middlemen" is even other (super commercial) artists, so it is even weirder than we are used to.

          i have some hope of the new generation learning about this stuff before they have gotten to tired to do something else and simply learn about files, maybe get a music player as a "symbol of coolness" or mobile os isn't just a duopoly in the future etc.

          if you have to stream the road to bad is easy to end up in. if you can deal with files, you are free.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
          Svar
          • Svar som emne
          Login for at svare
          • Ældste til nyeste
          • Nyeste til ældste
          • Most Votes


          • Log ind

          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          Graciously hosted by data.coop
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Hjem
          • Seneste
          • Etiketter
          • Populære
          • Verden
          • Bruger
          • Grupper