Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. FOUND IT

FOUND IT

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
31 Indlæg 26 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • faoluin@chitter.xyzF faoluin@chitter.xyz

    @lokeloski My job says we should only use it if we already have expertise on the subject... in which case, why use it at all?

    moz@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    moz@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    moz@fosstodon.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #15

    @faoluin @lokeloski we can either use it for writing code or writing tests, either way we're entirely responsible for what we contribute.

    The junior-ish who was wildly excited is now regretting his decision to spend more time writing tests and at least originally he hoped to spend less time writing code. But the joy of being a junior is that you learn so much so fast!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lokeloski@mastodon.socialL lokeloski@mastodon.social

      FOUND IT

      jackwilliambell@rustedneuron.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jackwilliambell@rustedneuron.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jackwilliambell@rustedneuron.com
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #16

      @lokeloski

      AKA? AI usage is driven by the Dunning-Kruger effect…

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • lokeloski@mastodon.socialL lokeloski@mastodon.social

        FOUND IT

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        baibold@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #17

        @lokeloski AI generation is a useful facimile in a place where nothing would have also been a more or less acceptable alternative.

        Which begs the question as to why we're wasting so much money on it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • lokeloski@mastodon.socialL lokeloski@mastodon.social

          FOUND IT

          mark@mastodon.fixermark.comM This user is from outside of this forum
          mark@mastodon.fixermark.comM This user is from outside of this forum
          mark@mastodon.fixermark.com
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #18

          @lokeloski Nice! It's like the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect, but for AI output.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • lokeloski@mastodon.socialL lokeloski@mastodon.social

            FOUND IT

            jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jplebreton@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #19

            @lokeloski Interesting I've also observed a dynamic where if someone - most commonly programmers - sees an LLM producing output that passes initial inspection or does something that they would consider a mark of human-level competence, there's a chance that they're completely beguiled by it and conclude from that point on that LLMs are now basically operating at approximately that competence level across *all fields*. The psychodynamics of it are really alarming and, clearly, socially corrosive.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • lokeloski@mastodon.socialL lokeloski@mastodon.social

              FOUND IT

              the4thcircle@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
              the4thcircle@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
              the4thcircle@mastodon.gamedev.place
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #20

              @lokeloski

              This is why CEOs assume it can do everything, because they don't know how to do anything.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lokeloski@mastodon.socialL lokeloski@mastodon.social

                FOUND IT

                E This user is from outside of this forum
                E This user is from outside of this forum
                eruwero@ieji.de
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #21

                @lokeloski and CEOs think it can replace everything. I wonder why...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR ratsnakegames@mastodon.social

                  @lokeloski the subtext here is also that at least some artists do not consider other artistic fields "real" art

                  philwill@aus.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  philwill@aus.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  philwill@aus.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #22

                  @ratsnakegames @lokeloski
                  Absolutely, what we do not know intimately we make assumptions about...
                  They 'just' do their thing, how could it possibly be as important, complex and difficult as the work that I am doing?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • lokeloski@mastodon.socialL lokeloski@mastodon.social

                    FOUND IT

                    denofearth@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                    denofearth@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                    denofearth@mas.to
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #23

                    @lokeloski
                    I recently went to an opera where the composer was not only present but also performing as one of the soloists, among five other vocalists, along with a men's choir, accompanied by a full orchestra.

                    The backdrop to this rich contribution to human musical art was AI visuals projected onto a screen.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • lokeloski@mastodon.socialL lokeloski@mastodon.social

                      FOUND IT

                      wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wobweger@mstdn.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #24

                      @lokeloski
                      alt-text screenshot of post by magicmooshka from Jan 7:
                      recently my friend's comics professor told her that it's acceptable to use gen AI for script-writing but not for art, since a machine can't generate meaningful artistic work. meanwhile, my sisters screenwriting professor said that they can use gen AI for concept art and visualization, but that it won't be able to generate script that's any good. and at my job, 1/2

                      wobweger@mstdn.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • wobweger@mstdn.socialW wobweger@mstdn.social

                        @lokeloski
                        alt-text screenshot of post by magicmooshka from Jan 7:
                        recently my friend's comics professor told her that it's acceptable to use gen AI for script-writing but not for art, since a machine can't generate meaningful artistic work. meanwhile, my sisters screenwriting professor said that they can use gen AI for concept art and visualization, but that it won't be able to generate script that's any good. and at my job, 1/2

                        wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wobweger@mstdn.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #25

                        it seems like each department says that AI can be useful in every field except the one that they know best.

                        it's only ever the jobs we're unfamiliar with that we assume can be replaced with automation.
                        The more attuned we are with certain processes, crafts and occupations, the more we realize that gen AI will never be able to provide a suitable replacement. The case for its existence relies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to be everything we don't. 2/2

                        wobweger@mstdn.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • wobweger@mstdn.socialW wobweger@mstdn.social

                          it seems like each department says that AI can be useful in every field except the one that they know best.

                          it's only ever the jobs we're unfamiliar with that we assume can be replaced with automation.
                          The more attuned we are with certain processes, crafts and occupations, the more we realize that gen AI will never be able to provide a suitable replacement. The case for its existence relies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to be everything we don't. 2/2

                          wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wobweger@mstdn.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #26

                          strange conclusions by those professors,
                          in my mind it works differently,
                          when I say #salami output in a field where I'm expert and judge it to be inferior and conclude so-marketed gen AI will not be a competition, I would conclude this is valid for a l l other fields as well, and I as a dilettante in all other fields can be tricked to accept generated output as valid.

                          wobweger@mstdn.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • wobweger@mstdn.socialW wobweger@mstdn.social

                            strange conclusions by those professors,
                            in my mind it works differently,
                            when I say #salami output in a field where I'm expert and judge it to be inferior and conclude so-marketed gen AI will not be a competition, I would conclude this is valid for a l l other fields as well, and I as a dilettante in all other fields can be tricked to accept generated output as valid.

                            wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wobweger@mstdn.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #27

                            the reason why mentioned professors and departments are willing to accept #salami output in other fields than theirs, may be caused by several year long propaganda on almost any channel, that claim we are living in a AI era, and that this is t h e new technology to be used, we see huge investments and think no one would just burn money on such a flawed dysfunctional slop generating "invention" so it must work

                            wobweger@mstdn.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • wobweger@mstdn.socialW wobweger@mstdn.social

                              the reason why mentioned professors and departments are willing to accept #salami output in other fields than theirs, may be caused by several year long propaganda on almost any channel, that claim we are living in a AI era, and that this is t h e new technology to be used, we see huge investments and think no one would just burn money on such a flawed dysfunctional slop generating "invention" so it must work

                              wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wobweger@mstdn.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wobweger@mstdn.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #28

                              stock prices are driven by this wild marketing stunt

                              7 titles dominate the S&P500 index, all 7 are in full hype cycle

                              this bubble has to go
                              this bubble will go
                              soon

                              #salami aka #AI #AGI #genAI

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • lokeloski@mastodon.socialL lokeloski@mastodon.social

                                FOUND IT

                                drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                drahardja@sfba.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #29

                                @lokeloski Gell-Mann Amnesia.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA adrianriskin@kolektiva.social

                                  @lokeloski

                                  It's the Gell-Mann amnesia effect all over again.

                                  -----------
                                  The Gell-Mann amnesia effect is a claimed cognitive bias describing the tendency of individuals to critically assess media reports in a domain they are knowledgeable about, yet continue to trust reporting in other areas despite recognizing similar potential inaccuracies.

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_amnesia_effect

                                  joepbc@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  joepbc@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  joepbc@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #30

                                  @AdrianRiskin @lokeloski or more generally the egocentric bias. Veritasium has a nice video on this: https://youtu.be/3LopI4YeC4I?si=ZV6CuklywzLekwHd

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA adrianriskin@kolektiva.social

                                    @lokeloski

                                    It's the Gell-Mann amnesia effect all over again.

                                    -----------
                                    The Gell-Mann amnesia effect is a claimed cognitive bias describing the tendency of individuals to critically assess media reports in a domain they are knowledgeable about, yet continue to trust reporting in other areas despite recognizing similar potential inaccuracies.

                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_amnesia_effect

                                    at1st@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    at1st@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    at1st@mstdn.ca
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #31

                                    @AdrianRiskin @lokeloski It's one of the reasons that, when pointing out that I do not like Generative LLMs for the work they output, I do emphasize that it's not just *my* programming expertise that I feel this for.

                                    Like, I feel the same way for books; if you wrote it with an LLM, and we can see because a prompt made it into the printed version, that tells me that you did not read what you claimed to have "Wrote" with an LLM - why should I read it then, when I know it can do the same thing it can do for math, or coding, or images?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                    Svar
                                    • Svar som emne
                                    Login for at svare
                                    • Ældste til nyeste
                                    • Nyeste til ældste
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Log ind

                                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Hjem
                                    • Seneste
                                    • Etiketter
                                    • Populære
                                    • Verden
                                    • Bruger
                                    • Grupper