Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
profsamlecturet
32 Indlæg 23 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

    There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

    1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #4

    Oh fuck, there are 9 more Xingwang megaconstellation satellites in orbit compared to Monday as well. Time to go outside (and not see any stars. I am really tired of cities).

    grb090423@mastodon.socialG bojanlandekic@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

      There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

      1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

      wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
      wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
      wtrmt@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #5

      @sundogplanets “This Starlink satellite crashed in the easiest place in the world to find space debris. Is that near your house?”

      #MastoClickBait #Space #spacejunk

      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • wtrmt@mastodon.socialW wtrmt@mastodon.social

        @sundogplanets “This Starlink satellite crashed in the easiest place in the world to find space debris. Is that near your house?”

        #MastoClickBait #Space #spacejunk

        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sundogplanets@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #6

        @wtrmt https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/2nd-piece-of-space-junk-landed-on-saskatchewan-farmland-in-2024-1.7502192

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

          There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

          1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

          bigmac7464@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bigmac7464@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bigmac7464@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #7

          @sundogplanets cape canaveral hit their record for launches last year. i believe it was 109. i used to work down there, and starlinks were going up every week or so.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

            There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

            1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

            warmsignull@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
            warmsignull@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
            warmsignull@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #8

            @sundogplanets So what are your proposed solutions and alternatives? Are you lucky enough to live in an area without light pollution? (regardless of satellites)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

              There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

              1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

              dmtomas@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dmtomas@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dmtomas@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #9

              @sundogplanets correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.09643 kind of saying that we have at most 11 years (another solar maximum cycle) to basically have 100% probability of a Kessler syndrome more or less locking us from accessing LEO (at least with humans aboard) … and screwing up astronoy for years AND dumping bunch of interesting stuff into the upper layers of atmosphere? If yes - Why The F”&£ we are still allowing any mega-constellations and not downing the ones in orbit?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #10

                @sundogplanets

                Here is thought experiment, which might make you incredibly depressed if being any more depressed in this day and age as possible: these satellites have a definite lifetime, and there is some expectation that some of them will become damaged and fall from orbit.

                Injection of satellites means a consequential and maybe exponential death rates. That’s just basic demographics.

                growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                  There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                  1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                  bocops@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bocops@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bocops@fosstodon.org
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #11

                  @sundogplanets I've just read that they are aiming for at least 12K (potentially 34K) satellites, with an average lifetime of 5-7 years.

                  Sorry if this question has been answered elsewhere already, but... is there any information about what 2,000 downed satellites each year will do to our atmosphere, exactly?

                  deedeeque@techhub.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                    There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                    1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                    sarae@ecoevo.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sarae@ecoevo.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sarae@ecoevo.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #12

                    @sundogplanets I saw a really bright red shooting star trailing sparks two nights ago when I went out to look for auroras, and wondered if it were a dissolving satellite

                    it was traveling south to north in the sky east of my house in coastal Oregon

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      Oh fuck, there are 9 more Xingwang megaconstellation satellites in orbit compared to Monday as well. Time to go outside (and not see any stars. I am really tired of cities).

                      grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grb090423@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #13

                      @sundogplanets

                      I can only manage a day in a city... and I used to live in London! (I loved it.) Now, give me nature and the countryside, any day 👍👍👍

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bocops@fosstodon.orgB bocops@fosstodon.org

                        @sundogplanets I've just read that they are aiming for at least 12K (potentially 34K) satellites, with an average lifetime of 5-7 years.

                        Sorry if this question has been answered elsewhere already, but... is there any information about what 2,000 downed satellites each year will do to our atmosphere, exactly?

                        deedeeque@techhub.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        deedeeque@techhub.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        deedeeque@techhub.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #14

                        @bocops @sundogplanets

                        I've heard 40,000.

                        bocops@fosstodon.orgB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • deedeeque@techhub.socialD deedeeque@techhub.social

                          @bocops @sundogplanets

                          I've heard 40,000.

                          bocops@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bocops@fosstodon.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bocops@fosstodon.org
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #15

                          @deedeeque That's even worse! I got the 34K from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                            There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                            1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                            greem@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            greem@cyberplace.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            greem@cyberplace.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #16

                            @sundogplanets and then there's TeraWave, which is Jeff's high bandwidth space based 5k+ LEO, 18 MEO constellation which starts launching next year.

                            They just keep on banging 'em up there 🙁

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                              There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                              1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                              dockwalk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dockwalk@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dockwalk@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #17

                              @sundogplanets
                              is there a map?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                Oh fuck, there are 9 more Xingwang megaconstellation satellites in orbit compared to Monday as well. Time to go outside (and not see any stars. I am really tired of cities).

                                bojanlandekic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bojanlandekic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bojanlandekic@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #18

                                @sundogplanets scene in a netflix scifi movie: why are the stars following me? Those arent stars those are drones and satepites...run!!!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                  There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                  1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                  kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kitkat_blue@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kitkat_blue@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #19

                                  @sundogplanets

                                  is anyone quantifying/studying the possible effects/persistance/deposition specifics of the injection of vaporized metals etc in the atmosphere from de-orbiting starlink satellites (and others) ?

                                  Is this ~15% attrition rate on these starlink satellites expected to be a sustained rate over the life of the program? If so... cumulatively, this could become quite significant over time. I do hope it's being looked at.

                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                    There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                    1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                    newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    newstik@social.heise.de
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #20

                                    @sundogplanets Blue Origin announced TeraWave today.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                                      @sundogplanets

                                      Here is thought experiment, which might make you incredibly depressed if being any more depressed in this day and age as possible: these satellites have a definite lifetime, and there is some expectation that some of them will become damaged and fall from orbit.

                                      Injection of satellites means a consequential and maybe exponential death rates. That’s just basic demographics.

                                      growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      growthhexis@theforkiverse.comG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      growthhexis@theforkiverse.com
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #21

                                      @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets this sounds like a business opportunity - satellite safety and recycling co. #darkhumor

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                        There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                        1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                        faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #22

                                        @sundogplanets 🤬☹️

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                          I have to update the Starlink numbers in my talk. But this time, I last gave my talk TWO DAYS AGO. This is stupid.

                                          There are 27 more Starlinks in orbit today than there were on Monday: there are now 9,526 Starlink satellites orbiting above our heads.

                                          1,458 have already been burned up in the atmosphere (and at least 1 of those made it to the ground in the easiest place in the world to find space debris...) adding many hundreds of tons of weird metals to the stratosphere. #ProfSamLectureTour

                                          nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nead@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nead@social.vivaldi.net
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #23

                                          @sundogplanets Keep fighting the good fight, Professor. We need someone to give us accurate information we can rely on.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper