Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Please, please stop supporting gen AI companies.

Please, please stop supporting gen AI companies.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
27 Indlæg 23 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

    Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

    mndflayr@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
    mndflayr@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
    mndflayr@metalhead.club
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #13

    @hacks4pancakes

    Congrats for the second post in that screen shot, I think the point you made there is not stated often enough.

    I really hate how LLM took over the general term "AI", that has been used in CS research for dozens of different approaches.

    hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • momo@social.linux.pizzaM momo@social.linux.pizza

      @hacks4pancakes
      I wonder if that decision to use AI in targetting was based on "Yes, use AI, it's perfect and can't do mistakes!!" or rather "We know that AI makes wrong decisions and combining this with live ammunition costs innocent lives. But it's not our civilians who get blown up, so we don't care. Acceptable is good enough!"-Irresponsibity.

      Or in simple terms: Are they ignorantly stupid or just cruel?

      jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jmax@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #14

      @momo @hacks4pancakes Both.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mndflayr@metalhead.clubM mndflayr@metalhead.club

        @hacks4pancakes

        Congrats for the second post in that screen shot, I think the point you made there is not stated often enough.

        I really hate how LLM took over the general term "AI", that has been used in CS research for dozens of different approaches.

        hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
        hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
        hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #15

        @mndflayr I drink and I know something

        E akaasjager@mastodon.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • momo@social.linux.pizzaM momo@social.linux.pizza

          @hacks4pancakes
          I wonder if that decision to use AI in targetting was based on "Yes, use AI, it's perfect and can't do mistakes!!" or rather "We know that AI makes wrong decisions and combining this with live ammunition costs innocent lives. But it's not our civilians who get blown up, so we don't care. Acceptable is good enough!"-Irresponsibity.

          Or in simple terms: Are they ignorantly stupid or just cruel?

          maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
          maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
          maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizza
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #16

          @momo @hacks4pancakes The leadership is swayed by the AI $$$. And they're too stupid to conider anything else. At work we've been testing a Claude-based system to remediate mssing alt-text in ebooks, and the results would not make me confident you could use it for targeting. In fact, the opposite of that.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • momo@social.linux.pizzaM momo@social.linux.pizza

            @hacks4pancakes
            I wonder if that decision to use AI in targetting was based on "Yes, use AI, it's perfect and can't do mistakes!!" or rather "We know that AI makes wrong decisions and combining this with live ammunition costs innocent lives. But it's not our civilians who get blown up, so we don't care. Acceptable is good enough!"-Irresponsibity.

            Or in simple terms: Are they ignorantly stupid or just cruel?

            lily_and_frog@mastodon.artL This user is from outside of this forum
            lily_and_frog@mastodon.artL This user is from outside of this forum
            lily_and_frog@mastodon.art
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #17

            @momo @hacks4pancakes

            Third option:
            They're cruel and murderous on purpose (Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and the US supports it after all) and initially planned to use AI as plausible denial for PR reasons, but don't because it doesn't make it look any better. Worse, in fact.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

              @mndflayr I drink and I know something

              E This user is from outside of this forum
              E This user is from outside of this forum
              elltee@mastodon.cloud
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #18

              @hacks4pancakes
              Its the opposite for me. I drink and I stop knowing things. 😋

              @mndflayr

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

                Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

                cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cosmicktrigger@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #19

                @hacks4pancakes

                To be fair, it's really easy to spin people up on Bluesky.

                I don't know of any truly left-leaning people who support AI.

                cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC cosmicktrigger@mastodon.social

                  @hacks4pancakes

                  To be fair, it's really easy to spin people up on Bluesky.

                  I don't know of any truly left-leaning people who support AI.

                  cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cosmicktrigger@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #20

                  @hacks4pancakes

                  We just need to give better training to the LLMs and make them wear body cams

                  ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

                    Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

                    raven667@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                    raven667@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                    raven667@hachyderm.io
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #21

                    @hacks4pancakes and the smug "military targeters would probably have made the same mistake" makes me think of Chief Wright (Stonekettle Station) who did targeting during the first Gulf War and talked about sleepless nights double-checking intelligence to make sure they didn't kill civilians, and called off attacks when they couldn't be sure, who would have been personally devastated if they learned a missile they launched had killed school-kids. The military structure at the time allowed him to care about such things, but Secretary Kegseth doesn't seem to care or have a soul as far as I can tell.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

                      @mndflayr I drink and I know something

                      akaasjager@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      akaasjager@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      akaasjager@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #22

                      @hacks4pancakes I don’t, and that probably has brought me in the permanent state that Terry Pratchett once called “knurd”. -5/10 can’t recommend

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                        @wendynather @hacks4pancakes seconded

                        kims@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kims@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kims@mas.to
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #23

                        @neurovagrant @wendynather @hacks4pancakes
                        Me three

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

                          Please, please stop supporting gen AI companies. It’s not worth it. https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/pentagon-ai-claude-bombing-elementary-school

                          nazani@universeodon.comN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nazani@universeodon.comN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nazani@universeodon.com
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #24

                          @hacks4pancakes
                          As a 97B, I was taught to always recheck any form of electronic or image intelligence. During WWII we "read" a flyover photo of people lined up to enter a Nazi gas chamber as people lined up to enter a mess hall.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC cosmicktrigger@mastodon.social

                            @hacks4pancakes

                            We just need to give better training to the LLMs and make them wear body cams

                            ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            ericlawton@kolektiva.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #25

                            @CosmickTrigger

                            Thank you.

                            The whole "AI safety" field in a nutshell.

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_safety

                            @hacks4pancakes @AnnaAnthro

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

                              Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

                              dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #26

                              @hacks4pancakes
                              I wish that would be an energy source…

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ariaflame@masto.aiA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ariaflame@masto.aiA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ariaflame@masto.ai
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #27

                                @jwi @hacks4pancakes Both are bad. One for giving bad information, the other for using it without checking it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
                                Svar
                                • Svar som emne
                                Login for at svare
                                • Ældste til nyeste
                                • Nyeste til ældste
                                • Most Votes


                                • Log ind

                                • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Hjem
                                • Seneste
                                • Etiketter
                                • Populære
                                • Verden
                                • Bruger
                                • Grupper