Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. It's interesting that Google's compliance with non-law government directives regarding the names of bodies of water is so blazingly fast, because, they say, it's their responsibility under the law and they're just following orders...

It's interesting that Google's compliance with non-law government directives regarding the names of bodies of water is so blazingly fast, because, they say, it's their responsibility under the law and they're just following orders...

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
41 Indlæg 33 Posters 57 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cliffle@hachyderm.ioC cliffle@hachyderm.io

    It's interesting that Google's compliance with non-law government directives regarding the names of bodies of water is so blazingly fast, because, they say, it's their responsibility under the law and they're just following orders...

    ...and yet their compliance with laws regarding labor rights, collective bargaining, sexual harrassment, and workforce diversity was and is glacial, despite being actual laws.

    Every response is a choice.

    buds_always@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    buds_always@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    buds_always@mstdn.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #31

    @cliffle

    Google is gonzo for me. Finally ditched it today. Fuck them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • j2kun@mathstodon.xyzJ j2kun@mathstodon.xyz

      @divVerent @tknarr @cliffle The German government also runs a place name system (BKG). Does it choose a different name that Maps ignores? If so, that might be worth complaining about.

      My point is really that people should first learn how the systems work before posting rants about them.

      divverent@social.vivaldi.netD This user is from outside of this forum
      divverent@social.vivaldi.netD This user is from outside of this forum
      divverent@social.vivaldi.net
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #32

      @j2kun @tknarr @cliffle The BKG seems to return "Ontariosee" and "Lake Ontario", depending on which of its APIs one uses.

      To some extent, the BKG reuses data from OpenStreetMap, BTW.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cliffle@hachyderm.ioC cliffle@hachyderm.io

        It's interesting that Google's compliance with non-law government directives regarding the names of bodies of water is so blazingly fast, because, they say, it's their responsibility under the law and they're just following orders...

        ...and yet their compliance with laws regarding labor rights, collective bargaining, sexual harrassment, and workforce diversity was and is glacial, despite being actual laws.

        Every response is a choice.

        the_turtle@polyglot.cityT This user is from outside of this forum
        the_turtle@polyglot.cityT This user is from outside of this forum
        the_turtle@polyglot.city
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #33

        @cliffle they are just magically drawn to fellatio.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
        • cliffle@hachyderm.ioC cliffle@hachyderm.io

          It's interesting that Google's compliance with non-law government directives regarding the names of bodies of water is so blazingly fast, because, they say, it's their responsibility under the law and they're just following orders...

          ...and yet their compliance with laws regarding labor rights, collective bargaining, sexual harrassment, and workforce diversity was and is glacial, despite being actual laws.

          Every response is a choice.

          jasper89@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jasper89@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jasper89@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #34

          @cliffle it’s interesting how clueless you are …

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • maya_b@hachyderm.ioM maya_b@hachyderm.io

            @antopatriarca

            I checked from Ontario today, and it's still Lake Ontario.

            Google announced that within the US it won't be shown as Lake Ontario however.

            @cliffle

            arielcg@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            arielcg@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            arielcg@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #35

            @maya_b @antopatriarca @cliffle what about the Gulf of Mexico, do you see it as "Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)" or just one of them? Asking because I'd expect they do the same with the Lake at some point

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cliffle@hachyderm.ioC cliffle@hachyderm.io

              It's interesting that Google's compliance with non-law government directives regarding the names of bodies of water is so blazingly fast, because, they say, it's their responsibility under the law and they're just following orders...

              ...and yet their compliance with laws regarding labor rights, collective bargaining, sexual harrassment, and workforce diversity was and is glacial, despite being actual laws.

              Every response is a choice.

              svelmoe@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
              svelmoe@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
              svelmoe@hachyderm.io
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #36

              @cliffle It definitely speaks loudly but unfortunately not enough. I would hope it helps wake up some people around me, but knowing their "It does not effect me" attitude - I doubt it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cliffle@hachyderm.ioC cliffle@hachyderm.io

                It's interesting that Google's compliance with non-law government directives regarding the names of bodies of water is so blazingly fast, because, they say, it's their responsibility under the law and they're just following orders...

                ...and yet their compliance with laws regarding labor rights, collective bargaining, sexual harrassment, and workforce diversity was and is glacial, despite being actual laws.

                Every response is a choice.

                axomamma@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                axomamma@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                axomamma@mastodon.online
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #37

                @cliffle Executive orders are not laws.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cliffle@hachyderm.ioC cliffle@hachyderm.io

                  It's interesting that Google's compliance with non-law government directives regarding the names of bodies of water is so blazingly fast, because, they say, it's their responsibility under the law and they're just following orders...

                  ...and yet their compliance with laws regarding labor rights, collective bargaining, sexual harrassment, and workforce diversity was and is glacial, despite being actual laws.

                  Every response is a choice.

                  xs4me2@mastodon.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xs4me2@mastodon.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xs4me2@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #38

                  @cliffle

                  Just following orders like a good sycophant would...

                  Remember 1945...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • divverent@social.vivaldi.netD divverent@social.vivaldi.net

                    @antopatriarca @maya_b @cliffle Germany sees "Lake Ontario (Lake America)". Not sure which other countries are affected how.

                    I presume it will be consistent with the Gulf of Mexico.

                    kjhank@social.vivaldi.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kjhank@social.vivaldi.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kjhank@social.vivaldi.net
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #39

                    @divVerent @antopatriarca @maya_b @cliffle Same for Poland.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cliffle@hachyderm.ioC cliffle@hachyderm.io

                      It's interesting that Google's compliance with non-law government directives regarding the names of bodies of water is so blazingly fast, because, they say, it's their responsibility under the law and they're just following orders...

                      ...and yet their compliance with laws regarding labor rights, collective bargaining, sexual harrassment, and workforce diversity was and is glacial, despite being actual laws.

                      Every response is a choice.

                      hasani@my-spaces.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hasani@my-spaces.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hasani@my-spaces.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #40

                      @cliffle Tells me that they see themselves as a part of the US government.

                      After letting that sink in for a bit, things they do/did now start to make a whole lot more sense.

                      cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • hasani@my-spaces.socialH hasani@my-spaces.social

                        @cliffle Tells me that they see themselves as a part of the US government.

                        After letting that sink in for a bit, things they do/did now start to make a whole lot more sense.

                        cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #41

                        @hasani @cliffle a very big part, of the Pentagon's JWCC, with a race to launch the Startgate by 2028.

                        https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/pentagon-splits-9-billion-cloud-computer-network-contract-between-4-firms

                        #JWCC #Stargate #DataCenters #Pentagon

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • anderslund@expressional.socialA anderslund@expressional.social shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper