Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Trying to edit a stupid FCC comment on Yet Another Fucking Stupid Orbital Data Center (fuck you, Blue Origin) and I need to go outside and rage-scream for a while.

Trying to edit a stupid FCC comment on Yet Another Fucking Stupid Orbital Data Center (fuck you, Blue Origin) and I need to go outside and rage-scream for a while.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
babygoatcountdo
46 Indlæg 23 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.socialO oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.social

    @sundogplanets

    Following your lead, I read "More Everything Forever", by Adam Becker. Thanks for that tip!

    To others alarmed by the insane "constellation" stampede:

    If you are thinking that this is merely billionaire greed, you might want that book. This is greed on a scale never unleashed before, infected with a malevolent pseudo-religion that is stunningly corrosive.

    You're probably aware of this already. Becker fleshes it out.

    oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #7

    I apologize for increasing the need to rage-scream. I would have made an independent post, but @sundogplanets is such an important info stream, and so widely followed by intelligent people, that it seems excusable to intrude on this thread, sometimes. Sorry!

    A key point that seems to be hidden from many of us is that these 'Titans of Greed" are not unaware of the harm they are doing. The role models among them want to do harm.

    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.socialO oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.social

      I apologize for increasing the need to rage-scream. I would have made an independent post, but @sundogplanets is such an important info stream, and so widely followed by intelligent people, that it seems excusable to intrude on this thread, sometimes. Sorry!

      A key point that seems to be hidden from many of us is that these 'Titans of Greed" are not unaware of the harm they are doing. The role models among them want to do harm.

      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sundogplanets@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #8

      @oldclumsy_nowmad Glad you read it and learned from it! It's an excellent book

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        Trying to edit a stupid FCC comment on Yet Another Fucking Stupid Orbital Data Center (fuck you, Blue Origin) and I need to go outside and rage-scream for a while. And I have an easily accessible hayfield to rage-scream in!! (Also maybe baby goats, I'll check for those too #BabyGoatCountdown)

        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sundogplanets@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #9

        Comments are due to the FCC on Mon for Blue Origin's copycat of SpaceX's fucking stupid orbital data center idea. Comments were due yesterday for the first SpaceX copycat: Starcloud (I hate everything about it, including the name). I was in chaotic travel mode for most of that and so had to rely on colleagues.

        Now I have to read these fucking docs to see what bullshit Blue Origin is serving up, so time to rant about it.

        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          Comments are due to the FCC on Mon for Blue Origin's copycat of SpaceX's fucking stupid orbital data center idea. Comments were due yesterday for the first SpaceX copycat: Starcloud (I hate everything about it, including the name). I was in chaotic travel mode for most of that and so had to rely on colleagues.

          Now I have to read these fucking docs to see what bullshit Blue Origin is serving up, so time to rant about it.

          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #10

          Blue Origin wants 51,600 satellites, all in sun-synchronous orbits. That means they'll follow the terminator line around the Earth and be sunlit ALWAYS. They want to distribute them between 500-1,800 km altitude, which means some of them will be sunlit and visible all the time. Fanfuckingtastic.

          This is also the exact same set of orbits that both SpaceX and Starcloud want. Sun-synchronous orbits are about to get ridiculously crowded.

          mekobi@mastodon.socialM sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS T martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM dstndstn@hachyderm.ioD 6 Replies Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            Blue Origin wants 51,600 satellites, all in sun-synchronous orbits. That means they'll follow the terminator line around the Earth and be sunlit ALWAYS. They want to distribute them between 500-1,800 km altitude, which means some of them will be sunlit and visible all the time. Fanfuckingtastic.

            This is also the exact same set of orbits that both SpaceX and Starcloud want. Sun-synchronous orbits are about to get ridiculously crowded.

            mekobi@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mekobi@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mekobi@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #11

            @sundogplanets If they really think they need to do this - which I'm no scientist, just a Sci-Fi fan, couldn't they maybe I don't know, collaborate and stick the tech on satellites combining different companies techs? Like instead of cell towers for each provider, combine the antennas on one per region...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              Blue Origin wants 51,600 satellites, all in sun-synchronous orbits. That means they'll follow the terminator line around the Earth and be sunlit ALWAYS. They want to distribute them between 500-1,800 km altitude, which means some of them will be sunlit and visible all the time. Fanfuckingtastic.

              This is also the exact same set of orbits that both SpaceX and Starcloud want. Sun-synchronous orbits are about to get ridiculously crowded.

              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sundogplanets@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #12

              "BLUE ORIGIN BACKGROUND" a.k.a. the grandiose greenwashing section. Oh they named this Project Sunrise?! Project Sunrise sounds like a billion times worse than Reflect Orbital...

              Whatever it is, at least they didn't name it Project Sunshine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_SUNSHINE

              You just never fucking know with these techbro companies...

              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                "BLUE ORIGIN BACKGROUND" a.k.a. the grandiose greenwashing section. Oh they named this Project Sunrise?! Project Sunrise sounds like a billion times worse than Reflect Orbital...

                Whatever it is, at least they didn't name it Project Sunshine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_SUNSHINE

                You just never fucking know with these techbro companies...

                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #13

                Oh my god the "PUBLIC INTEREST" section is a giant love fest over all the things that AI isn't actually doing. Don't worry guys, if you launch data centers into orbit, they are way greener! There's always solar power in space! Please just ignore all the rocket exhaust, ablation products, and shit hitting the ground... Also the fact that data centers in space are almost certainly physically impossible...

                gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.orgG sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR gooba42@mastodon.socialG 4 Replies Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Oh my god the "PUBLIC INTEREST" section is a giant love fest over all the things that AI isn't actually doing. Don't worry guys, if you launch data centers into orbit, they are way greener! There's always solar power in space! Please just ignore all the rocket exhaust, ablation products, and shit hitting the ground... Also the fact that data centers in space are almost certainly physically impossible...

                  gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.org
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #14

                  @sundogplanets

                  IMHO there are other better ways to create some thousands of jobs.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    Oh my god the "PUBLIC INTEREST" section is a giant love fest over all the things that AI isn't actually doing. Don't worry guys, if you launch data centers into orbit, they are way greener! There's always solar power in space! Please just ignore all the rocket exhaust, ablation products, and shit hitting the ground... Also the fact that data centers in space are almost certainly physically impossible...

                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #15

                    The shitweasels are also asking for waivers! Because the few rules that are left are just too much.

                    Please don't ask Jeff Bezos to pay a measly million dollar bond in case they don't launch 50% of their sats within 6 years. That would be unfair! Also please don't worry about what radio spectrum we'll use, because we totally promise not to have any interference at all, even though we provide absolutely zero information about how our satellites work!

                    michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      Blue Origin wants 51,600 satellites, all in sun-synchronous orbits. That means they'll follow the terminator line around the Earth and be sunlit ALWAYS. They want to distribute them between 500-1,800 km altitude, which means some of them will be sunlit and visible all the time. Fanfuckingtastic.

                      This is also the exact same set of orbits that both SpaceX and Starcloud want. Sun-synchronous orbits are about to get ridiculously crowded.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      tadbithuman@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #16

                      @sundogplanets Aren't there treaties that limit what can be put up there? Why not?

                      dstndstn@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        The shitweasels are also asking for waivers! Because the few rules that are left are just too much.

                        Please don't ask Jeff Bezos to pay a measly million dollar bond in case they don't launch 50% of their sats within 6 years. That would be unfair! Also please don't worry about what radio spectrum we'll use, because we totally promise not to have any interference at all, even though we provide absolutely zero information about how our satellites work!

                        michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                        michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                        michael_w_busch@mastodon.online
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #17

                        @sundogplanets

                        Thank you for reading through this mess so that the rest of us do not have to.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          The shitweasels are also asking for waivers! Because the few rules that are left are just too much.

                          Please don't ask Jeff Bezos to pay a measly million dollar bond in case they don't launch 50% of their sats within 6 years. That would be unfair! Also please don't worry about what radio spectrum we'll use, because we totally promise not to have any interference at all, even though we provide absolutely zero information about how our satellites work!

                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #18

                          Oh another one too: Please don't ask us about our debris mitigation plan because the "satellite design is currently being matured" (in other words, they have no fucking clue what the satellites will actually look like or how they will work).

                          Oh yet another: we totally can't upload our orbital parameter date because the FCC's web form is too crappy! (This part I actually believe. The FCC's website blows.) But come on guys, no orbits?

                          Oh yeah, didn't submit to the ITU yet either. Of course.

                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS trenchworms@eldritch.cafeT aetios@sns.minovsky.spaceA 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            Blue Origin wants 51,600 satellites, all in sun-synchronous orbits. That means they'll follow the terminator line around the Earth and be sunlit ALWAYS. They want to distribute them between 500-1,800 km altitude, which means some of them will be sunlit and visible all the time. Fanfuckingtastic.

                            This is also the exact same set of orbits that both SpaceX and Starcloud want. Sun-synchronous orbits are about to get ridiculously crowded.

                            martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                            martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                            martinvermeer@fediscience.org
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #19

                            @sundogplanets

                            > Sun-synchronous orbits are about to get ridiculously crowded.

                            True, but there is good news. I know you want to hear good news, right? The _relative_ velocities between all these sun-synchronous satellites will be small, so the intra-orbit contribution to the Kessler syndrome will be close to zero. Won't help a lot, because of all those satellites in other orbits...

                            martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              Oh my god the "PUBLIC INTEREST" section is a giant love fest over all the things that AI isn't actually doing. Don't worry guys, if you launch data centers into orbit, they are way greener! There's always solar power in space! Please just ignore all the rocket exhaust, ablation products, and shit hitting the ground... Also the fact that data centers in space are almost certainly physically impossible...

                              raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                              raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                              raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #20

                              @sundogplanets
                              No-one knows how to cool a 100kW satellite, much less one that's 1 MW.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                Oh another one too: Please don't ask us about our debris mitigation plan because the "satellite design is currently being matured" (in other words, they have no fucking clue what the satellites will actually look like or how they will work).

                                Oh yet another: we totally can't upload our orbital parameter date because the FCC's web form is too crappy! (This part I actually believe. The FCC's website blows.) But come on guys, no orbits?

                                Oh yeah, didn't submit to the ITU yet either. Of course.

                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #21

                                That was the Narrative, now on to the Technical Annex. Whoopee.

                                Ok, so they want 300-1,000 satellites per plane, separated by 5-10km, ranging from 500-1,800km altitude. All in sun-synchronous. Like I said, super crowded.

                                There's a bunch of info about spectrum use, I will leave this to my radio colleagues to interpret. (dBW/m^2/MHz units... flux, I guess? Eeek.) It's probably bad.

                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  Oh my god the "PUBLIC INTEREST" section is a giant love fest over all the things that AI isn't actually doing. Don't worry guys, if you launch data centers into orbit, they are way greener! There's always solar power in space! Please just ignore all the rocket exhaust, ablation products, and shit hitting the ground... Also the fact that data centers in space are almost certainly physically impossible...

                                  gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gooba42@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #22

                                  @sundogplanets The only spaceship with the resources to run a data center is the one we all live on and we're not even very good at it here where there's easy maintenance, somewhere to put the heat, ready power supply and bandwidth.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T tadbithuman@mastodon.social

                                    @sundogplanets Aren't there treaties that limit what can be put up there? Why not?

                                    dstndstn@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dstndstn@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dstndstn@hachyderm.io
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #23

                                    @tadbithuman @sundogplanets
                                    the Outer Space Treaty (1967) is the closest thing; and because negotiating international treaties is hard

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      That was the Narrative, now on to the Technical Annex. Whoopee.

                                      Ok, so they want 300-1,000 satellites per plane, separated by 5-10km, ranging from 500-1,800km altitude. All in sun-synchronous. Like I said, super crowded.

                                      There's a bunch of info about spectrum use, I will leave this to my radio colleagues to interpret. (dBW/m^2/MHz units... flux, I guess? Eeek.) It's probably bad.

                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #24

                                      ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION this part will be the most "fun"

                                      But a reminder that they asked for a waiver for their debris plan, so I guess that this is just... for funsies?

                                      Here's the first and only information I've seen about the satellite sizes. They will be bigger than 10cm, so they will be easily tracked! No shit!! A fucking data center needs to be bigger than 10cm! What useful information!!

                                      jgg@qoto.orgJ sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS rbmath@mathstodon.xyzR oldclumsy_nowmad@mastodon.socialO 4 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        Blue Origin wants 51,600 satellites, all in sun-synchronous orbits. That means they'll follow the terminator line around the Earth and be sunlit ALWAYS. They want to distribute them between 500-1,800 km altitude, which means some of them will be sunlit and visible all the time. Fanfuckingtastic.

                                        This is also the exact same set of orbits that both SpaceX and Starcloud want. Sun-synchronous orbits are about to get ridiculously crowded.

                                        dstndstn@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dstndstn@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dstndstn@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #25

                                        @sundogplanets
                                        some of my favourite satellites use(d) that orbit (WISE; SPHEREx) - it's great for surveyors

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM martinvermeer@fediscience.org

                                          @sundogplanets

                                          > Sun-synchronous orbits are about to get ridiculously crowded.

                                          True, but there is good news. I know you want to hear good news, right? The _relative_ velocities between all these sun-synchronous satellites will be small, so the intra-orbit contribution to the Kessler syndrome will be close to zero. Won't help a lot, because of all those satellites in other orbits...

                                          martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          martinvermeer@fediscience.org
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #26

                                          @sundogplanets BTW do the documents address the cooling problem?

                                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper