The critical thing to understand about this air conditioning debate is that fossil fuel companies should be held accountable for destroying the planet.
-
@BigGangForEvery1 @luckytran they don't though. Our choice of energy production is what makes it actively worse. Making people cook in 40+C weather because a corporation wants to make an extra buck burning coal to make their product instead of buying a solar panel is not the right answer. Even in the US, with pretty high use of AC, its use accounts for something like 6 or 7% of energy use. It's a drop in the bucket and was never the problem.
@hubertus @luckytran they do. Try'em. Going for legislation first is the quickest way to depower the commoner. Give them something they can actually do. Collectively agree, and then keep your money
-
@bsmall2 what's got me upset about the AC debate (from what I've seen) is that a lot of folks are punching down at people who use AC, as though we do it for funsies and not out of necessity, or as though we all have control over our home situations. (I rent, live in the subtropical US, our windows don't open, and I'm disabled, I cannot get hot or I will get very sick. It's not like I could fix the insulation or cooling system on the place we rent to be more eco friendly.) Sigh.
-
@hubertus @luckytran they do. Try'em. Going for legislation first is the quickest way to depower the commoner. Give them something they can actually do. Collectively agree, and then keep your money
@BigGangForEvery1 @luckytran I'd agree if it had a significant impact and wasn't performative. People switching to vegetarian diets, for example, would be far, far more impactful and would directly incentivize companies to move resources away from meat production, which is a huge environmental impact.
Using less energy doesn't necessarily incentivize moving away from fossil fuels... if burning is still cheaper, that's still what they'll do.
-
The critical thing to understand about this air conditioning debate is that fossil fuel companies should be held accountable for destroying the planet.
@luckytran What's more important to you. The enviroment or your pound of flesh from big oil? They provided the energy that society needed for over a hundred years. You shut them out of the Kyoto accords, along with anyone else who could have told you the plan wouldn't work. Then boldly said you'd hold them personally responsible for providing for our collective energy needs.
Both sides have made serious errors in judgement. The way forward is to let bygones be bygones & focus on solutions.
-
@luckytran So I take you don't drive a car or use any fossil fuels in your daily existence, right? What is "destroying" the planet is people that make blanket statements they are #conditioned to except as fact while they ignore real dangerous issues like #DigitalID and the legal entanglements that come with that in my opinion. How do you say that the #coal burning electric companies have done any wrong? when most of us use #fossilfuels on a daily bases?
@snowpheonix @luckytran
How?
Well, coal is the worst fossil fuel, and the companies should have moved from it for any combustion they still do;
The pace of change from combustion to solar+wind has been slower than it should.
There's 2 criticisms of the companies. -
@luckytran What's more important to you. The enviroment or your pound of flesh from big oil? They provided the energy that society needed for over a hundred years. You shut them out of the Kyoto accords, along with anyone else who could have told you the plan wouldn't work. Then boldly said you'd hold them personally responsible for providing for our collective energy needs.
Both sides have made serious errors in judgement. The way forward is to let bygones be bygones & focus on solutions.
You mean the solutions big oil companies spend a lot of money blocking? Like renewable energy projects that their lapdog in the white house keeps cancelling on their behalf?
-
You mean the solutions big oil companies spend a lot of money blocking? Like renewable energy projects that their lapdog in the white house keeps cancelling on their behalf?
@gbargoud @luckytran I'm not up for defending either side. You're both assholes. But in all fairness your side DID punch first. You shut them out along with economists or even civil engineers with the energy sector experience when you laid plans to end their entire industry at their own punitive expense. What'd you expect? Them to roll over & die? Mistakes have been made by both sides.
whats your priority. The actual fucking environment or was that just a ruse to justify a personal vendetta? -
@gbargoud @luckytran I'm not up for defending either side. You're both assholes. But in all fairness your side DID punch first. You shut them out along with economists or even civil engineers with the energy sector experience when you laid plans to end their entire industry at their own punitive expense. What'd you expect? Them to roll over & die? Mistakes have been made by both sides.
whats your priority. The actual fucking environment or was that just a ruse to justify a personal vendetta?Oil companies have been burying studies about man-made climate change longer than I have been alive you absolute fucking tool.
-
@luckytran Correct sentiment, wrong target. Corporations are legal fictions. They have no brains, blood or bones. However the men, and it was almost exclusively men, who provided the brains have known since the mid-1980s that fossil fuels would result in exactly what we are facing now. Those fuckers need to be hunted down and imprisoned. Before they are trotted off to some hell on earth, they must be stripped of every dollar they have and that money should be allocated to disaster recovery in those, oh so many parts of the world that are suffering from climate crisis. Their greedy and irresponsible behaviour deserves the severest punishments we can find for them.
@Die_Mad @luckytran So what you’re saying is that when there are creatures without brains running around wrecking things, we shouldn’t try and stop them?
Of course we need to hold the people behind it accountable, but stopping the companies is vital. They are legal fictions, but they are reified legal fictions. They very much exist.
-
@Die_Mad @luckytran So what you’re saying is that when there are creatures without brains running around wrecking things, we shouldn’t try and stop them?
Of course we need to hold the people behind it accountable, but stopping the companies is vital. They are legal fictions, but they are reified legal fictions. They very much exist.
-
@Die_Mad @luckytran So what you’re saying is that when there are creatures without brains running around wrecking things, we shouldn’t try and stop them?
Of course we need to hold the people behind it accountable, but stopping the companies is vital. They are legal fictions, but they are reified legal fictions. They very much exist.
@ahltorp @luckytran I assumed that once the Board of Directors, CEOs, and others acting as the guiding minds of the corporations saw that they would be held accountable, personally, for corporate misdeeds, the irresponsible conduct of the corporations would stop immediately. Not much benefit in a fat paycheque if it will be taken away from you immediately and you are sent to a hell on earth. Some of them might be inspired to immediately cause the otherwise brainless corporate entity to take remedial action to repair the horrors it has created.
-
@snowpheonix @luckytran
How?
Well, coal is the worst fossil fuel, and the companies should have moved from it for any combustion they still do;
The pace of change from combustion to solar+wind has been slower than it should.
There's 2 criticisms of the companies.@Photo55 @luckytran
I couldn't agree with you more and I would point out Nikola Tesla’s vision of wireless #electricity was an ambitious plan to transmit energy globally without physical power lines.The issue is making the technology affordable rather than creating another dependency model which is the current model. People in power prefer the model that keeps you dependent on giant corporations charging you instead of #FreeEnergy
-
@splitradix @luckytran
Exactly.. going by your list, the only people not "destroying" the world is North Korea.. But also.. everytime I turn on a light, fly somewhere, even living creatures breathing fresh air and exhaling #Co2 are blamed and that diverts attention away from the real issue.. #PollutionIn everything, we have to work together and focus on real solutions.
https://stream.radio.co/sb766dcb88/low
The Felicity Station is where the signal, the land, the journey, and the people meet.
Road transportation is the greatest oil demanding sector in OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) member states. U.S. and China by far largest consumers
The United States and China are the greatest oil consumers worldwide by a wide margin. In 2024, daily oil consumption in these countries amounted to 19 million barrels and 16.6 million barrels, respectively. https://www.statista.com/statistics/307194/top-oil-consuming-sectors-worldwide -
@Photo55 @luckytran
I couldn't agree with you more and I would point out Nikola Tesla’s vision of wireless #electricity was an ambitious plan to transmit energy globally without physical power lines.The issue is making the technology affordable rather than creating another dependency model which is the current model. People in power prefer the model that keeps you dependent on giant corporations charging you instead of #FreeEnergy
Rife was distinctly dubious, and people who tried to make him credible in Wikipedia a few years ago were a great nuisance.
Tesla, clever chap. My phone charges nicely and reasonably efficiently by resonant induction of some sort, over a few mm.
My car would charge rather less well from a coil buried in tarmac.
My house - best to stick to wires. Whether for solar power out or whatever fungible mixture inward.
We will have vehicles of some sort.
-
S suneauken@mastodon.world shared this topic
