If I were to write a firefox extension to flag sites and pages that are AI slop, I could either rely on user input (where users are responsible for tagging sloppy webpages) or an AI checker tool.
-
If I were to write a firefox extension to flag sites and pages that are AI slop, I could either rely on user input (where users are responsible for tagging sloppy webpages) or an AI checker tool.
So far, I haven't found any open source AI checker tools, but I could search deeper.
Either way, I would need to create a database for the extension to access to read whether the page/site in question exists on the database and whether it has been flagged as AI
-
If I were to write a firefox extension to flag sites and pages that are AI slop, I could either rely on user input (where users are responsible for tagging sloppy webpages) or an AI checker tool.
So far, I haven't found any open source AI checker tools, but I could search deeper.
Either way, I would need to create a database for the extension to access to read whether the page/site in question exists on the database and whether it has been flagged as AI
Database translation key:
Yellow: entry does not exist OR inconclusive tests
Green sheet: probably not AI
Red sheet: probably AIMake ignore list: social media, streaming, established businesses, interactive service sites (banking, e-commerce, bill pay)
Categorize the entire English-language internet, and run passages through a series of AI checkers, hoping to get results definitive enough to flag as human or AI.
Create a database large enough to be useful, and then open for others' input.
-
Database translation key:
Yellow: entry does not exist OR inconclusive tests
Green sheet: probably not AI
Red sheet: probably AIMake ignore list: social media, streaming, established businesses, interactive service sites (banking, e-commerce, bill pay)
Categorize the entire English-language internet, and run passages through a series of AI checkers, hoping to get results definitive enough to flag as human or AI.
Create a database large enough to be useful, and then open for others' input.
Crawling process:
Use google trends to find popular search terms
Search the 10 most popular topics of the day
Follow every link on the first page of each query
Run text from each result through two AI checkers
Tag each result as human, AI, or inconclusive@malte Check in, what do you think of the plan in this thread?
-
M malte@radikal.social shared this topic
-
Crawling process:
Use google trends to find popular search terms
Search the 10 most popular topics of the day
Follow every link on the first page of each query
Run text from each result through two AI checkers
Tag each result as human, AI, or inconclusive@malte Check in, what do you think of the plan in this thread?
@diffdude I think it's a promising start and hope others will join your conversation. I think a plugin eventually could have both an AI checker and human input.