🧩 A math puzzle.

[cherrypixelbun@yiff.life]

@internetarchive hey what the fuck

[mhc@kolektiva.social]

@internetarchive oh no, please don't fall down this hole.

[polyplacophora@wandering.shop]

@internetarchive Stop using the damned thing.

[crowk@critter.cafe]

@internetarchive what is wrong with you? i can't believe this of the archive. i've made my last donation until this gets addressed. and i mean properly, not just a quiet little walkback. actually fucking insane what i just read, and where i read it from.

[pandora@eldritch.cafe]

@zzt @jonpsp @internetarchive We need a movie named Thank You For Prompting

[elliessurviving@tech.lgbt]

@internetarchive you seriously have lost all my respect promoting a misinfomation regurgitation tool like this

[voiceofvesperakamae@tech.lgbt]

@internetarchive Hey why would you think this is at all a good idea?

[gnomon@mastodon.social]

@internetarchive

s/and thier attributes/and their attributes/

s/still make sense/still makes sense/

s/(Half of the answers are actuarial and half of) it is not/\1 them are not/ # (and no mention in the article of the response to the half of the question about the morality of it?)

s/and the data map was useful/and the data map were useful/

Who wrote this article? There is no byline.

The Internet Archive should not be associating themselves with the work this article is about. For shame.

[laukidh@infosec.exchange]

@internetarchive what a waste

[jake4480@c.im]

@internetarchive suspect they're gonna get some unfollows after this from some folks. Like me!

[glyph@mastodon.social]

@internetarchive please stop this

[macronaut@mas.to]

@internetarchive https://mastodon.social/@effinbirds/117192491305927725

[bredroll@mas.to]

@internetarchive this doesn't make you guys look worthy of our support if you are going to feed the machines killing our creativity and cloning our content

[shawnhooper@fosstodon.org]

@internetarchive An archival organization promoting GenAI? No. Take this down and donate to an organization actually fighting the climate crisis.

[jrdepriest@infosec.exchange]

@internetarchive

Monthly giving circle donation canceled. Thanks.

[armavica@social.sciences.re]

@internetarchive Noo, you were the chosen one!! It was said that you would *destroy* the AI bros, not join them!

[tjk@oldbytes.space]

@internetarchive I'm stopping my donations. Fuck this.

[mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org]

@tjk @internetarchive at the same time, they cannot fix blocking ordinary people behind dynamic IPs denied access because they are misrecognised as bots.

[coolerpseudonym@wandering.shop]

@internetarchive looks like it didn't work

[yayroos@tech.lgbt]

@internetarchive ah yes. let's have one of the only bastions of accurate archiving of the digital world start spewing out bullshit at random.

who asked for this? why would anyone think wasting energy on 'climateGPT' would be a good move?

ok it's an experiment a trial a proof of concept. did anyone stop to ask if it was worth trying? if the concept had any merit to prove? because it's not and it doesnt.

keep the llm shit as far away from your operations as possible. please. so there's some chance of maintaining an accurate record of this period in history. which is supposed to be your whole thing.