🧩 A math puzzle.

[voiceofvesperakamae@tech.lgbt]

@internetarchive Hey why would you think this is at all a good idea?

[gnomon@mastodon.social]

@internetarchive

s/and thier attributes/and their attributes/

s/still make sense/still makes sense/

s/(Half of the answers are actuarial and half of) it is not/\1 them are not/ # (and no mention in the article of the response to the half of the question about the morality of it?)

s/and the data map was useful/and the data map were useful/

Who wrote this article? There is no byline.

The Internet Archive should not be associating themselves with the work this article is about. For shame.

[laukidh@infosec.exchange]

@internetarchive what a waste

[jake4480@c.im]

@internetarchive suspect they're gonna get some unfollows after this from some folks. Like me!

[glyph@mastodon.social]

@internetarchive please stop this

[macronaut@mas.to]

@internetarchive https://mastodon.social/@effinbirds/117192491305927725

[bredroll@mas.to]

@internetarchive this doesn't make you guys look worthy of our support if you are going to feed the machines killing our creativity and cloning our content

[shawnhooper@fosstodon.org]

@internetarchive An archival organization promoting GenAI? No. Take this down and donate to an organization actually fighting the climate crisis.

[jrdepriest@infosec.exchange]

@internetarchive

Monthly giving circle donation canceled. Thanks.

[armavica@social.sciences.re]

@internetarchive Noo, you were the chosen one!! It was said that you would *destroy* the AI bros, not join them!

[tjk@oldbytes.space]

@internetarchive I'm stopping my donations. Fuck this.

[mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.org]

@tjk @internetarchive at the same time, they cannot fix blocking ordinary people behind dynamic IPs denied access because they are misrecognised as bots.

[coolerpseudonym@wandering.shop]

@internetarchive looks like it didn't work

[yayroos@tech.lgbt]

@internetarchive ah yes. let's have one of the only bastions of accurate archiving of the digital world start spewing out bullshit at random.

who asked for this? why would anyone think wasting energy on 'climateGPT' would be a good move?

ok it's an experiment a trial a proof of concept. did anyone stop to ask if it was worth trying? if the concept had any merit to prove? because it's not and it doesnt.

keep the llm shit as far away from your operations as possible. please. so there's some chance of maintaining an accurate record of this period in history. which is supposed to be your whole thing.

[bytebro@mastodonapp.uk]

@WAHa_06x36 @internetarchive

That seems like a slightly harsh thing to say to an archive bot?

Are you having a good day, yourself?

[tsturm@famichiki.jp]

@internetarchive First I thought I would write some sort of response along the lines of "WTF are you doing?", but I'm actually just too tired.

You are all grown-ups and you are literally working in a place that stores the world's knowledge. If you can't see why you, of all people, feeding knowledge into OpenAI's word blender and expecting new insights to appear is an useless exercise, then nothing I say can help you.

[shaknais@mastodon.social]

@internetarchive

How can you back CARTA, and this, at the same time?

[bytebro@mastodonapp.uk]

@ehproque @ozzelot @pikesley @internetarchive

You are absolutely correct, and my apologies. If 'the archive' turns off its AI wank, I'll go back there and revisit.

[yayroos@tech.lgbt]

@clarioncat @elle @internetarchive ok but we could have used all that lovely hydro power for something... useful... instead of a slightly greener bullshit and plagiarism machine. by using it for that they've forced other power needs back onto fossil fuels and defeated any gains. step one of reduce reuse recycle is don't use resources you don't need to use.

[decay@gts.todayiwilllaunchmyinfantsonintoorbit.com]

@internetarchive eat shit