Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. It's a Good Cloud Day.

It's a Good Cloud Day.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
78 Indlæg 53 Posters 315 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

    That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

    SpaceX is awful.

    samloonie@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    samloonie@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    samloonie@mstdn.ca
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #47

    @sundogplanets Also, every piece of aluminum that they burn or drop in the ocean is aluminum that could be used for other things.
    A very productive mine in Australia is closing because it's run out of ore. Copper mines are extracting ever larger amounts of rock to get smaller specks of copper sulphate.
    There's no thought for the future.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

      @angelastella
      It is really quite good.

      Separately, one of the discussions I've seen in #SciFi is of the minimum size of society for prolonged survival in Space.
      Large.

      angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
      angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
      angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #48

      @Photo55

      I remember a good discussion about that topic on Charles Stross' weblog. If the idea is having modern industry, it could run to millions.

      photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

        That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

        SpaceX is awful.

        eetschrijver@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        eetschrijver@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        eetschrijver@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #49

        @sundogplanets Horrible!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nixzhu@mastodon.socialN nixzhu@mastodon.social

          @sundogplanets As a Chinese citizen, I hope to one day use Starlink to bypass the GFW and access the open Internet. SpaceX is doing amazing work!

          paulmckrcu@social.kernel.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
          paulmckrcu@social.kernel.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
          paulmckrcu@social.kernel.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #50
          @nixzhu @sundogplanets We just need heavy industry in orbit so that the potential and kinetic energy of those satellites can be recycled. 😉
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA angelastella@social.treehouse.systems

            @Photo55

            I remember a good discussion about that topic on Charles Stross' weblog. If the idea is having modern industry, it could run to millions.

            photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            photo55@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #51

            @angelastella
            That's the one.
            Various scifi authors have introduced ideas - rather deus ex machina ones - to reduce the number of bodies required to hold thouse skills and functions.
            I suppose now YouTube etc is a bit of a start 😉

            angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

              That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

              SpaceX is awful.

              lin11c@toad.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lin11c@toad.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lin11c@toad.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #52

              @sundogplanets
              We must make sure that what comes down does not go back up. No Starlinks! I wonder if they are still shooting them up there. My guess is yes. We have to stop this Monster Musk in every way possible.

              lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • spottyfox@pounced-on.meS spottyfox@pounced-on.me

                @albertcardona @sundogplanets Also have an animated version

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oxP3TyuQx0

                davefischer@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                davefischer@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                davefischer@hachyderm.io
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #53

                @spottyfox @albertcardona @sundogplanets

                Apparently Bradbury was very popular in the Eastern Bloc. There's also a live-action Soviet Martian Chronicles. (And a bunch more. Low-budget not-very-good F 451, decent Veldt, etc.)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                  @angelastella
                  That's the one.
                  Various scifi authors have introduced ideas - rather deus ex machina ones - to reduce the number of bodies required to hold thouse skills and functions.
                  I suppose now YouTube etc is a bit of a start 😉

                  angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                  angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                  angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #54

                  @Photo55

                  Sharing practical knowledge is a must. And it's the kind of thing we already do, not like molecular nanotechnology enabling cornucopia machines, or either versatile robots, or something else.

                  photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    @nixzhu I'm sorry that's what you are forced to depend on. Enjoy it before SpaceX starts Kessler Syndrome, I guess?

                    nixzhu@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nixzhu@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nixzhu@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #55

                    @sundogplanets If the Kessler Syndrome actually triggers, we’ll just have to launch a fleet of specialized 'cleaner satellites' to clear the debris field and restore the orbit.

                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                      @sundogplanets

                      August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                      "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                      https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                      #scifi

                      yamabikko@theforkiverse.comY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yamabikko@theforkiverse.comY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yamabikko@theforkiverse.com
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #56

                      @albertcardona @sundogplanets Love this! Love Bradbury's crisp writing style and searing cynicism. Thanks!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nixzhu@mastodon.socialN nixzhu@mastodon.social

                        @sundogplanets If the Kessler Syndrome actually triggers, we’ll just have to launch a fleet of specialized 'cleaner satellites' to clear the debris field and restore the orbit.

                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #57

                        @nixzhu Good luck inventing that.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pascal@norden.socialP pascal@norden.social

                          @sundogplanets
                          unintended terraforming?
                          "Scientists are eager to understand how these particles of aerospace debris interact with other aerosols in the stratosphere because of anticipated increases in space traffic and their potential impact on the ozone layer. They also want to explore the impact of possible future proposals to seed the stratosphere with millions of tons of sulfur aerosols to slow the rate of global warming by reflecting sunlight back to space."
                          https://research.noaa.gov/noaa-scientists-link-exotic-metal-particles-in-the-upper-atmosphere-to-rockets-satellites/

                          cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cy@fedicy.us.to
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #58
                          Yeah that uh... sulfur aerosols idea was clearly thought up by people who said "I saw The Matrix, and that version of the future looked just so much fun for humans to live in."
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                            That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                            SpaceX is awful.

                            refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                            refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                            refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyz
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #59

                            It makes me think of a recent proposal for terraforming mars by introducing tiny amounts of aluminium to the atmosphere.

                            @sundogplanets

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                              @sundogplanets

                              August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                              "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                              https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                              #scifi

                              phooky@hexa.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
                              phooky@hexa.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
                              phooky@hexa.club
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #60

                              @albertcardona @sundogplanets i didn't realize that There Will Come Soft Rains day is coming! I've got to get all my home automation stuff set up!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA angelastella@social.treehouse.systems

                                @Photo55

                                Sharing practical knowledge is a must. And it's the kind of thing we already do, not like molecular nanotechnology enabling cornucopia machines, or either versatile robots, or something else.

                                photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                photo55@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #61

                                @angelastella
                                #JohnBrunner with Eptification - with a bad result - and #JoeHaldeman with some sort of overlays in #WorldsApart and assorted authors with "memory tapes and of course #TheMatrix "now I do!"

                                And in a less friendly way #LarryNiven with #Corpsicles and #RichardMorgan with the #DigitallyStoredHumans and #DigitallyFreightedHumans and uploading into a sleeve.

                                And a bunch more.

                                #SciFi

                                angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                                  @angelastella
                                  #JohnBrunner with Eptification - with a bad result - and #JoeHaldeman with some sort of overlays in #WorldsApart and assorted authors with "memory tapes and of course #TheMatrix "now I do!"

                                  And in a less friendly way #LarryNiven with #Corpsicles and #RichardMorgan with the #DigitallyStoredHumans and #DigitallyFreightedHumans and uploading into a sleeve.

                                  And a bunch more.

                                  #SciFi

                                  angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #62

                                  @Photo55

                                  Yes, shortcuts to make the most of limited bodies. But to keep a closed ecology plus the mechanical part of the habitat and some mining/manufacturing capability there's no easy substitute for those bodies, and I'm afraid the number needed is still higher than expected.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                    That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                    SpaceX is awful.

                                    shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    shiitaketoast@beige.party
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #63

                                    @sundogplanets what is the GHG factor of aluminum?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                      That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                      SpaceX is awful.

                                      hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hansbot@mastodon.green
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #64

                                      @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Now imagine having a million data centers in orbit, from musk alone. Before long, every few seconds a satellite will come down – with all its payload burning into the atmosphere

                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                        That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                        SpaceX is awful.

                                        guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #65

                                        @sundogplanets as I understand it, it’s even worse

                                        https://youtu.be/iDaG4zt0NKc

                                        These alloys don’t vanish, their chemical components mix with the air, they keep floating high up and they cause changes

                                        /cc @keithdpatch

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • hansbot@mastodon.greenH hansbot@mastodon.green

                                          @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Now imagine having a million data centers in orbit, from musk alone. Before long, every few seconds a satellite will come down – with all its payload burning into the atmosphere

                                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #66

                                          @hansbot @mastodonmigration It's every 3 minutes for a million satellites with 5 year lifetimes 😭

                                          hansbot@mastodon.greenH 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper