Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. It's a Good Cloud Day.

It's a Good Cloud Day.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
78 Indlæg 53 Posters 315 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

    That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

    SpaceX is awful.

    eetschrijver@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    eetschrijver@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    eetschrijver@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #49

    @sundogplanets Horrible!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nixzhu@mastodon.socialN nixzhu@mastodon.social

      @sundogplanets As a Chinese citizen, I hope to one day use Starlink to bypass the GFW and access the open Internet. SpaceX is doing amazing work!

      paulmckrcu@social.kernel.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
      paulmckrcu@social.kernel.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
      paulmckrcu@social.kernel.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #50
      @nixzhu @sundogplanets We just need heavy industry in orbit so that the potential and kinetic energy of those satellites can be recycled. 😉
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA angelastella@social.treehouse.systems

        @Photo55

        I remember a good discussion about that topic on Charles Stross' weblog. If the idea is having modern industry, it could run to millions.

        photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        photo55@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #51

        @angelastella
        That's the one.
        Various scifi authors have introduced ideas - rather deus ex machina ones - to reduce the number of bodies required to hold thouse skills and functions.
        I suppose now YouTube etc is a bit of a start 😉

        angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

          That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

          SpaceX is awful.

          lin11c@toad.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lin11c@toad.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lin11c@toad.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #52

          @sundogplanets
          We must make sure that what comes down does not go back up. No Starlinks! I wonder if they are still shooting them up there. My guess is yes. We have to stop this Monster Musk in every way possible.

          lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • spottyfox@pounced-on.meS spottyfox@pounced-on.me

            @albertcardona @sundogplanets Also have an animated version

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oxP3TyuQx0

            davefischer@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            davefischer@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            davefischer@hachyderm.io
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #53

            @spottyfox @albertcardona @sundogplanets

            Apparently Bradbury was very popular in the Eastern Bloc. There's also a live-action Soviet Martian Chronicles. (And a bunch more. Low-budget not-very-good F 451, decent Veldt, etc.)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

              @angelastella
              That's the one.
              Various scifi authors have introduced ideas - rather deus ex machina ones - to reduce the number of bodies required to hold thouse skills and functions.
              I suppose now YouTube etc is a bit of a start 😉

              angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
              angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
              angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #54

              @Photo55

              Sharing practical knowledge is a must. And it's the kind of thing we already do, not like molecular nanotechnology enabling cornucopia machines, or either versatile robots, or something else.

              photo55@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                @nixzhu I'm sorry that's what you are forced to depend on. Enjoy it before SpaceX starts Kessler Syndrome, I guess?

                nixzhu@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nixzhu@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nixzhu@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #55

                @sundogplanets If the Kessler Syndrome actually triggers, we’ll just have to launch a fleet of specialized 'cleaner satellites' to clear the debris field and restore the orbit.

                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                  @sundogplanets

                  August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                  "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                  https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                  #scifi

                  yamabikko@theforkiverse.comY This user is from outside of this forum
                  yamabikko@theforkiverse.comY This user is from outside of this forum
                  yamabikko@theforkiverse.com
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #56

                  @albertcardona @sundogplanets Love this! Love Bradbury's crisp writing style and searing cynicism. Thanks!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nixzhu@mastodon.socialN nixzhu@mastodon.social

                    @sundogplanets If the Kessler Syndrome actually triggers, we’ll just have to launch a fleet of specialized 'cleaner satellites' to clear the debris field and restore the orbit.

                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #57

                    @nixzhu Good luck inventing that.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pascal@norden.socialP pascal@norden.social

                      @sundogplanets
                      unintended terraforming?
                      "Scientists are eager to understand how these particles of aerospace debris interact with other aerosols in the stratosphere because of anticipated increases in space traffic and their potential impact on the ozone layer. They also want to explore the impact of possible future proposals to seed the stratosphere with millions of tons of sulfur aerosols to slow the rate of global warming by reflecting sunlight back to space."
                      https://research.noaa.gov/noaa-scientists-link-exotic-metal-particles-in-the-upper-atmosphere-to-rockets-satellites/

                      cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cy@fedicy.us.to
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #58
                      Yeah that uh... sulfur aerosols idea was clearly thought up by people who said "I saw The Matrix, and that version of the future looked just so much fun for humans to live in."
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                        That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                        SpaceX is awful.

                        refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                        refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyzR This user is from outside of this forum
                        refurioanachro@mathstodon.xyz
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #59

                        It makes me think of a recent proposal for terraforming mars by introducing tiny amounts of aluminium to the atmosphere.

                        @sundogplanets

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                          @sundogplanets

                          August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                          "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                          https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                          #scifi

                          phooky@hexa.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
                          phooky@hexa.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
                          phooky@hexa.club
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #60

                          @albertcardona @sundogplanets i didn't realize that There Will Come Soft Rains day is coming! I've got to get all my home automation stuff set up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA angelastella@social.treehouse.systems

                            @Photo55

                            Sharing practical knowledge is a must. And it's the kind of thing we already do, not like molecular nanotechnology enabling cornucopia machines, or either versatile robots, or something else.

                            photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            photo55@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #61

                            @angelastella
                            #JohnBrunner with Eptification - with a bad result - and #JoeHaldeman with some sort of overlays in #WorldsApart and assorted authors with "memory tapes and of course #TheMatrix "now I do!"

                            And in a less friendly way #LarryNiven with #Corpsicles and #RichardMorgan with the #DigitallyStoredHumans and #DigitallyFreightedHumans and uploading into a sleeve.

                            And a bunch more.

                            #SciFi

                            angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • photo55@mastodon.socialP photo55@mastodon.social

                              @angelastella
                              #JohnBrunner with Eptification - with a bad result - and #JoeHaldeman with some sort of overlays in #WorldsApart and assorted authors with "memory tapes and of course #TheMatrix "now I do!"

                              And in a less friendly way #LarryNiven with #Corpsicles and #RichardMorgan with the #DigitallyStoredHumans and #DigitallyFreightedHumans and uploading into a sleeve.

                              And a bunch more.

                              #SciFi

                              angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                              angelastella@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                              angelastella@social.treehouse.systems
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #62

                              @Photo55

                              Yes, shortcuts to make the most of limited bodies. But to keep a closed ecology plus the mechanical part of the habitat and some mining/manufacturing capability there's no easy substitute for those bodies, and I'm afraid the number needed is still higher than expected.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                SpaceX is awful.

                                shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                shiitaketoast@beige.party
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #63

                                @sundogplanets what is the GHG factor of aluminum?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                  That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                  SpaceX is awful.

                                  hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hansbot@mastodon.green
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #64

                                  @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Now imagine having a million data centers in orbit, from musk alone. Before long, every few seconds a satellite will come down – with all its payload burning into the atmosphere

                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                    That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                    SpaceX is awful.

                                    guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #65

                                    @sundogplanets as I understand it, it’s even worse

                                    https://youtu.be/iDaG4zt0NKc

                                    These alloys don’t vanish, their chemical components mix with the air, they keep floating high up and they cause changes

                                    /cc @keithdpatch

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • hansbot@mastodon.greenH hansbot@mastodon.green

                                      @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Now imagine having a million data centers in orbit, from musk alone. Before long, every few seconds a satellite will come down – with all its payload burning into the atmosphere

                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #66

                                      @hansbot @mastodonmigration It's every 3 minutes for a million satellites with 5 year lifetimes 😭

                                      hansbot@mastodon.greenH 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        @hansbot @mastodonmigration It's every 3 minutes for a million satellites with 5 year lifetimes 😭

                                        hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hansbot@mastodon.green
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #67

                                        @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Yes. And it will likely not become a monopoly. Two competitors in the US, one in the EU, one in China, one in India, and it’s down to 2/min. To replace these, they would need a dozen or so launches per day, adding to the looming environmental disaster

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                          A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                                          That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                                          SpaceX is awful.

                                          nrmacdonald@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nrmacdonald@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nrmacdonald@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #68

                                          @sundogplanets
                                          Being an old man, when you say v1 and v2 my first mental images are these.
                                          Whilst the effect of these are decidedly different in detail, their destructive nature is not.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper