Fun fact to keep you awake tonight: Just had a chat with an atmospheric chemist and the best comparison she could come up with for the pollution that would result from burning up 1 million "AI datacenter" satellites in Earth's atmosphere is a nuclear war.

[michael_w_busch@mastodon.online]

@paul_ipv6 @sundogplanets

That is not what that phrase is supposed to mean.

[sophie@hub.somaton.com]

@Prof. Sam Lawler this is freaking grotesque!

[cafechatnoir@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets

Oh.

Well, I didn't need to sleep ever again.

[christo_459@mastodon.me.uk]

@sundogplanets
Musk is a danger to life on earth

[aburka@hachyderm.io]

@sundogplanets "... But we do know it was us that scorched the sky."

[calum@mastodon.dazed-gerbil.com]

@sundogplanets thanks for that 🥺

[sauc3@hachyderm.io]

@sundogplanets

Why can't we have the future where we are led by scientists and not the stupidest assholes?

[albertojavier@universeodon.com]

@sundogplanets let's take a moment to remember those idiots who spent years talking straight sh!t about the so-called chemtrails. Chemtrails don't exist, idiots do..

[n_dimension@infosec.exchange]

@paul_ipv6 @sundogplanets

AiWinter is the secret solution to the "Cooking to death" climate collapse.

See? Broligarchs were right when they said AI fill fix #climatecollapse

[paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange]

@n_dimension @sundogplanets

sadly, "fix" in the veterinary sense of the word...

[nini@oldbytes.space]

@sundogplanets Guess it's a good thing it's a near-impossibility to get that many into the atmosphere though it's not like I want half of that number either, even a tenth feels like a lot.

[malcircuit@thingy.social]

@sundogplanets seems fine

[markhurst@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets I have a bunch of shows in the Techtonic pipeline right now but at *some* point if/when you're available, I'd love to talk with you on the show about this risk

[ericfielding@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets Nuclear war, but without plutonium so a little different.

[olivia_55@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets then what?

[trabern@mas.to]

@sundogplanets Hard to imagine we survived the 1970s-1980s mutually assured destruction era just to end up back in the same stupidity.

[funkylab@mastodon.social]

@sundogplanets considering the mass of material transported to atmosphere by under- and above-ground nuclear tests, that seems to be off by a couple of orders of magnitude.

[paco@infosec.exchange]

@sundogplanets nearly 10 years ago “we have had enough of experts” today, it has completely come true. The experts are almost totally sidelined.

https://www.london.edu/think/who-needs-experts

[paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange]

@trabern @sundogplanets

i remember all the civil rights stuff from the 60s/70s and we're right back there again too. constant vigilance is needed to not regress.

i love science, since the assumption in science is that you always need to know where you've been, what's worked and not worked, and hopefully you don't revisit dead ends.

[bzdev@fosstodon.org]

@sundogplanets If they want to put a server farm in orbit, how about at the L4 or L5 Lagrange points for the Earth-Moon system? They'd be in direct sunlight most of the time, reducing the need for batteries. Less impact on telescopes as well.

For Elon's LLM, let's put it at L3 (Earth/Sun system), which would have some real benefits for the rest of us: with the sun in the way, it would be hard to "talk" to it.