I was really hoping to go through life without needing to know what the plural of "apocalypse" is.

[wpalant@infosec.exchange]

@mike Then I suggest that you don’t look it up on Wiktionary. Their vote is boring.

@evacide

[bodhipaksa@mastodon.scot]

@evacide Good Buffy reference. That was always one of my favorite lines.

[sharpcheddargoblin@kolektiva.social]

@evacide According to Gibson's "The Peripheral", that would be a Jackpot.

[psh@infosec.exchange]

@evacide

[dpnash@c.im]

@evacide

If it works kind of like “cyclops”, then:

“apocalypese” (a-pocka-lipp-eez)

[worik@mastodon.social]

@Darkphoenix @evacide ???

[muddle@infosec.exchange]

@evacide Putting on my pedant hat here, but the proper word is "Armageddon." Then again, the original meaning has been mostly lost and almost everyone basically conflates the two words.

A notable exception: Larry Wall (of Perl fame) still uses "Apocalypses" in the original sense...

https://backpan.perl.org/modules/by-authors/id/A/AU/AUTRIJUS/Perl6-Bible-0.24.readme

[clayote@peoplemaking.games]

@kkarhan @evacide apocalypodes

[darkphoenix@universeodon.com]

@worik @evacide
I live relatively close to the largest Marine base in California.

[mancavgeek@social.teamb.space]

@evacide
apocalypi?
apocalypses?
Oh, wait, hear me out on this.

An on-going series of apocalypse-level of events - surely that would be "apoc..."
(Apoc + ellipsis)

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@infoseclogger @evacide concurrency and parallelism

[xs4me2@mastodon.social]

@evacide

SNAFU…