Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. 100%.

100%.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
10 Indlæg 9 Posters 6 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    tante@tldr.nettime.org
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    RE: https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall/117358990093685067

    100%. The whole "terrorists can use an LLM to build a bomb" is a dumb movie plot threat. If you want to hurt people, lack of knowledge is not your problem. And nobody needs to develop a new chemical to do terrorism. All you need is readily available.

    This is just "AI" labs creating imaginary issues to distract us from the real harm they cause.

    liw@toot.liw.fiL karlheinzhaslip@climatejustice.socialK mathieui@piaille.frM 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

      RE: https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall/117358990093685067

      100%. The whole "terrorists can use an LLM to build a bomb" is a dumb movie plot threat. If you want to hurt people, lack of knowledge is not your problem. And nobody needs to develop a new chemical to do terrorism. All you need is readily available.

      This is just "AI" labs creating imaginary issues to distract us from the real harm they cause.

      liw@toot.liw.fiL This user is from outside of this forum
      liw@toot.liw.fiL This user is from outside of this forum
      liw@toot.liw.fi
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @tante In the 90s there was a moral panic about "the internet teaching you how to make bombs". Therefore, the network should be shut down. I went to the Helsinki public library with a friend who's a chemistry student and looked up gunpowder in various dictionaries. Unsurprisingly, most of them were detailed enough that with a little (dangerous!) experimentation, you could follow them to make some.

      Nobody I told about this wanted to shut down public libraries. Go figure.

      drwetter@mastodon.socialD pare@kamu.socialP 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

        RE: https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall/117358990093685067

        100%. The whole "terrorists can use an LLM to build a bomb" is a dumb movie plot threat. If you want to hurt people, lack of knowledge is not your problem. And nobody needs to develop a new chemical to do terrorism. All you need is readily available.

        This is just "AI" labs creating imaginary issues to distract us from the real harm they cause.

        karlheinzhaslip@climatejustice.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        karlheinzhaslip@climatejustice.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        karlheinzhaslip@climatejustice.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @tante AI is used to direct the rockets with the explosives strapped to the daughters of Iranian military officers. But then, they have people who would do the same, just a bit slower.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

          RE: https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall/117358990093685067

          100%. The whole "terrorists can use an LLM to build a bomb" is a dumb movie plot threat. If you want to hurt people, lack of knowledge is not your problem. And nobody needs to develop a new chemical to do terrorism. All you need is readily available.

          This is just "AI" labs creating imaginary issues to distract us from the real harm they cause.

          mathieui@piaille.frM This user is from outside of this forum
          mathieui@piaille.frM This user is from outside of this forum
          mathieui@piaille.fr
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @tante anyone who wanted to could have made a bomb several decades algo already. It is admittedly very easy to make, but what makes society work is that people usually do not want to make bombs, and the few who want to are so off the rails that they make one blunder or another on the way there.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • liw@toot.liw.fiL liw@toot.liw.fi

            @tante In the 90s there was a moral panic about "the internet teaching you how to make bombs". Therefore, the network should be shut down. I went to the Helsinki public library with a friend who's a chemistry student and looked up gunpowder in various dictionaries. Unsurprisingly, most of them were detailed enough that with a little (dangerous!) experimentation, you could follow them to make some.

            Nobody I told about this wanted to shut down public libraries. Go figure.

            drwetter@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            drwetter@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            drwetter@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @liw @tante I remember the "moral panic".

            Nevertheless LLMs make /everything/ easier and more accessible.

            nobrainnopain@social.tchncs.deN david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD pikesley@mastodon.me.ukP 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • drwetter@mastodon.socialD drwetter@mastodon.social

              @liw @tante I remember the "moral panic".

              Nevertheless LLMs make /everything/ easier and more accessible.

              nobrainnopain@social.tchncs.deN This user is from outside of this forum
              nobrainnopain@social.tchncs.deN This user is from outside of this forum
              nobrainnopain@social.tchncs.de
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @drwetter @liw @tante giving Darwin more chances to eliminate the dumb playing with chemicals?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • drwetter@mastodon.socialD drwetter@mastodon.social

                @liw @tante I remember the "moral panic".

                Nevertheless LLMs make /everything/ easier and more accessible.

                david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @drwetter @liw @tante

                They also make it harder to spot real information.

                Go to a library and there’s a pretty good chance that chemistry books are reviewed by actual chemists and will contain correct instructions.

                Go to the Internet and there will be a bunch of things like The Anarchist’s Cookbook full of recipes that are likely to blow your hands off if you try them, but also university sites that contain vetted educational information.

                Go to an LLM and the part of the latent space that generates your answer might come from a textbook, might come from some novel, might come from some TimeCube-like alternative chemistry craziness. The second time you ask might come from a different mix of these. And you have no way of knowing which.

                Note: if you look up how to build a nuclear bomb on the Internet, the instructions that you’re most likely to find are a CIA ‘leak’ that was intended to send the Soviet nuclear programme down a blind alley, so also won’t work. I wouldn’t be surprised if these ended up with many copies in LLM training sets.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • drwetter@mastodon.socialD drwetter@mastodon.social

                  @liw @tante I remember the "moral panic".

                  Nevertheless LLMs make /everything/ easier and more accessible.

                  pikesley@mastodon.me.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pikesley@mastodon.me.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pikesley@mastodon.me.uk
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  @drwetter @liw @tante as long as you're happy to operate on the basis that everything it tells you might be invented out of whole cloth, sure

                  drwetter@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • liw@toot.liw.fiL liw@toot.liw.fi

                    @tante In the 90s there was a moral panic about "the internet teaching you how to make bombs". Therefore, the network should be shut down. I went to the Helsinki public library with a friend who's a chemistry student and looked up gunpowder in various dictionaries. Unsurprisingly, most of them were detailed enough that with a little (dangerous!) experimentation, you could follow them to make some.

                    Nobody I told about this wanted to shut down public libraries. Go figure.

                    pare@kamu.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pare@kamu.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pare@kamu.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9

                    @liw @tante There are also hobbyists’ books from the 1950s and 1960s in the public libraries here. Some of them have proper instructions for gunpowder and other explosives. The times after the Second World War were… different.

                    And I think there are a lot of books about guns and shooting, too. Many people do also have guns as a hobby and own them and ammunition, but somehow this isn’t a problem.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pikesley@mastodon.me.ukP pikesley@mastodon.me.uk

                      @drwetter @liw @tante as long as you're happy to operate on the basis that everything it tells you might be invented out of whole cloth, sure

                      drwetter@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      drwetter@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      drwetter@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #10

                      @pikesley @liw @tante

                      Different context but listen the the background chorus: 😂

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_lfgahuMk0

                      And : "I'm the first in line"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper