Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. 🔋 Finland's 'sand battery' survived its first brutal winter.

🔋 Finland's 'sand battery' survived its first brutal winter.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
scienceenergyrenewablefinlandengineering
12 Indlæg 9 Posters 24 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

    🔋 Finland's 'sand battery' survived its first brutal winter. But the viral story gets one big thing wrong.

    What's real:
    - Polar Night Energy built a commercial thermal battery in Pornainen, Finland (5,000 people)
    - 2,000 tons of crushed soapstone heated to 500-600C
    - 1 MW power, 100 MWh capacity
    - 100% oil reduction (literally zero oil used now)
    - 70% CO2 emissions cut, 60% less wood chip combustion
    - Survived winter 2025-2026 without interruption
    - 5 projects across Finland, 9M euros funding

    What's misleading:

    1) It stores HEAT, not electricity. The 100 MWh is thermal energy. It can't power your lights or EV - it heats buildings via district heating. 'Store electricity in sand' implies grid-scale electrical storage, which this isn't.

    2) It's not sand - it's crushed soapstone (a byproduct from Finnish fireplace manufacturing). Better heat capacity and density than plain sand. 'Sand battery' is branding.

    3) The 80-90% round-trip efficiency is company-claimed, not independently verified. And it's electricity-to-heat-to-heat, not electricity-to-electricity. Comparing it to lithium-ion (90-95%) is apples-to-oranges.

    4) The underlying tech (packed-bed thermal storage) is decades old. What's new is the application, branding, and business model.

    The sand battery isn't competing with your Powerwall. It's competing with oil boilers - and it's already winning.

    Full fact-check: https://hermez.prose.sh/finland-sand-battery-survived-winter

    #science #energy #renewable #Finland #engineering #CleanEnergy

    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scotF This user is from outside of this forum
    faithfulljohn@mastodon.scot
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #2

    @jcrabapple Really good analysis! Thanks 🙏

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

      🔋 Finland's 'sand battery' survived its first brutal winter. But the viral story gets one big thing wrong.

      What's real:
      - Polar Night Energy built a commercial thermal battery in Pornainen, Finland (5,000 people)
      - 2,000 tons of crushed soapstone heated to 500-600C
      - 1 MW power, 100 MWh capacity
      - 100% oil reduction (literally zero oil used now)
      - 70% CO2 emissions cut, 60% less wood chip combustion
      - Survived winter 2025-2026 without interruption
      - 5 projects across Finland, 9M euros funding

      What's misleading:

      1) It stores HEAT, not electricity. The 100 MWh is thermal energy. It can't power your lights or EV - it heats buildings via district heating. 'Store electricity in sand' implies grid-scale electrical storage, which this isn't.

      2) It's not sand - it's crushed soapstone (a byproduct from Finnish fireplace manufacturing). Better heat capacity and density than plain sand. 'Sand battery' is branding.

      3) The 80-90% round-trip efficiency is company-claimed, not independently verified. And it's electricity-to-heat-to-heat, not electricity-to-electricity. Comparing it to lithium-ion (90-95%) is apples-to-oranges.

      4) The underlying tech (packed-bed thermal storage) is decades old. What's new is the application, branding, and business model.

      The sand battery isn't competing with your Powerwall. It's competing with oil boilers - and it's already winning.

      Full fact-check: https://hermez.prose.sh/finland-sand-battery-survived-winter

      #science #energy #renewable #Finland #engineering #CleanEnergy

      newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
      newstik@social.heise.deN This user is from outside of this forum
      newstik@social.heise.de
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #3

      @jcrabapple And how many fireplaces could possibly be built to scale this business model?

      And then how much CO2 would be released from the use of all these fireplaces?

      I like the project, but I'm not sure it can reasonably scale.

      jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ mcslibinas@mastodon.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • newstik@social.heise.deN newstik@social.heise.de

        @jcrabapple And how many fireplaces could possibly be built to scale this business model?

        And then how much CO2 would be released from the use of all these fireplaces?

        I like the project, but I'm not sure it can reasonably scale.

        jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jcrabapple@dmv.community
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #4

        @newstik those are very good questions! A lot of these types of innovations work great for small communities but don't work at scale, or just don't make sense at scale.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

          🔋 Finland's 'sand battery' survived its first brutal winter. But the viral story gets one big thing wrong.

          What's real:
          - Polar Night Energy built a commercial thermal battery in Pornainen, Finland (5,000 people)
          - 2,000 tons of crushed soapstone heated to 500-600C
          - 1 MW power, 100 MWh capacity
          - 100% oil reduction (literally zero oil used now)
          - 70% CO2 emissions cut, 60% less wood chip combustion
          - Survived winter 2025-2026 without interruption
          - 5 projects across Finland, 9M euros funding

          What's misleading:

          1) It stores HEAT, not electricity. The 100 MWh is thermal energy. It can't power your lights or EV - it heats buildings via district heating. 'Store electricity in sand' implies grid-scale electrical storage, which this isn't.

          2) It's not sand - it's crushed soapstone (a byproduct from Finnish fireplace manufacturing). Better heat capacity and density than plain sand. 'Sand battery' is branding.

          3) The 80-90% round-trip efficiency is company-claimed, not independently verified. And it's electricity-to-heat-to-heat, not electricity-to-electricity. Comparing it to lithium-ion (90-95%) is apples-to-oranges.

          4) The underlying tech (packed-bed thermal storage) is decades old. What's new is the application, branding, and business model.

          The sand battery isn't competing with your Powerwall. It's competing with oil boilers - and it's already winning.

          Full fact-check: https://hermez.prose.sh/finland-sand-battery-survived-winter

          #science #energy #renewable #Finland #engineering #CleanEnergy

          kathrinm@muenster.imK This user is from outside of this forum
          kathrinm@muenster.imK This user is from outside of this forum
          kathrinm@muenster.im
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #5

          @jcrabapple Just some small addition: As a geologic term, the word sand specifies only grain size and not composition. The sand battery could very well be filled with sand, provided the crushed soapstone has the correct grain size.
          In everyday language, "sand" is obviously understood differently, but I think this should at least be noted in a fact-check. Giving physical properties for "sand" in a fact-check without specifying the material is not good, though "plain sand" probably means quartz.

          mcslibinas@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jcrabapple@dmv.community
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #6

            @bigblen from what I remember, Finland's system is pretty advanced. They were at like 75% carbon neutral production, I think.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gurre@mastodon.nuG This user is from outside of this forum
              gurre@mastodon.nuG This user is from outside of this forum
              gurre@mastodon.nu
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #7

              @bigblen @jcrabapple
              Afaik district heating is common across the Nordics. But yeah, the heat has to generate somehow. iirc here in Stockholm a lot of it from burning trash.

              kskehu@mementomori.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • newstik@social.heise.deN newstik@social.heise.de

                @jcrabapple And how many fireplaces could possibly be built to scale this business model?

                And then how much CO2 would be released from the use of all these fireplaces?

                I like the project, but I'm not sure it can reasonably scale.

                mcslibinas@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mcslibinas@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mcslibinas@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #8

                @newstik @jcrabapple plain sand is not 3 times worse and can be used pretty fine. So your "what about" is just "what about".

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • kathrinm@muenster.imK kathrinm@muenster.im

                  @jcrabapple Just some small addition: As a geologic term, the word sand specifies only grain size and not composition. The sand battery could very well be filled with sand, provided the crushed soapstone has the correct grain size.
                  In everyday language, "sand" is obviously understood differently, but I think this should at least be noted in a fact-check. Giving physical properties for "sand" in a fact-check without specifying the material is not good, though "plain sand" probably means quartz.

                  mcslibinas@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mcslibinas@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mcslibinas@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #9

                  @KathrinM @jcrabapple in fact check they used 0.80 J/kg for sand while in other places it's 0.83 J/kg

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • lettosprey@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lettosprey@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lettosprey@tech.lgbt
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #10

                    @bigblen Distributed heating is very common here, but it is generally built around use of excess energy, so finding an alternative would not mean replacing oil. But, new ways to store energy for distributed heading could possibly mean it opens up to new locations.

                    The fact that it is so common here shows that it works well, we use water to carry heat, a great way to heat in winter. No dust burning, no risk of fire if covered, etc

                    @jcrabapple

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jcrabapple@dmv.communityJ jcrabapple@dmv.community

                      🔋 Finland's 'sand battery' survived its first brutal winter. But the viral story gets one big thing wrong.

                      What's real:
                      - Polar Night Energy built a commercial thermal battery in Pornainen, Finland (5,000 people)
                      - 2,000 tons of crushed soapstone heated to 500-600C
                      - 1 MW power, 100 MWh capacity
                      - 100% oil reduction (literally zero oil used now)
                      - 70% CO2 emissions cut, 60% less wood chip combustion
                      - Survived winter 2025-2026 without interruption
                      - 5 projects across Finland, 9M euros funding

                      What's misleading:

                      1) It stores HEAT, not electricity. The 100 MWh is thermal energy. It can't power your lights or EV - it heats buildings via district heating. 'Store electricity in sand' implies grid-scale electrical storage, which this isn't.

                      2) It's not sand - it's crushed soapstone (a byproduct from Finnish fireplace manufacturing). Better heat capacity and density than plain sand. 'Sand battery' is branding.

                      3) The 80-90% round-trip efficiency is company-claimed, not independently verified. And it's electricity-to-heat-to-heat, not electricity-to-electricity. Comparing it to lithium-ion (90-95%) is apples-to-oranges.

                      4) The underlying tech (packed-bed thermal storage) is decades old. What's new is the application, branding, and business model.

                      The sand battery isn't competing with your Powerwall. It's competing with oil boilers - and it's already winning.

                      Full fact-check: https://hermez.prose.sh/finland-sand-battery-survived-winter

                      #science #energy #renewable #Finland #engineering #CleanEnergy

                      sortius@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sortius@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sortius@beige.party
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #11

                      @jcrabapple sand is defined by grain size, not composition.

                      That said, awesome stuff

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gurre@mastodon.nuG gurre@mastodon.nu

                        @bigblen @jcrabapple
                        Afaik district heating is common across the Nordics. But yeah, the heat has to generate somehow. iirc here in Stockholm a lot of it from burning trash.

                        kskehu@mementomori.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kskehu@mementomori.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kskehu@mementomori.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #12

                        @Gurre @bigblen @jcrabapple

                        From the pdf available here: https://energia.fi/en/statistics/statistics-on-district-heating/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • bogwitch@social.data.coopB bogwitch@social.data.coop shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper