Excusez-moi?!
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron from David Karp
that's what he did with Tumblr -
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron who paid him?
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron I’m going to put my money on “the author probably used AI to ‘research’ a topic, and it hallucinated”
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron Wenn du nicht mehr hier bist, wo bist du dann?! 🤪
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron Maybe they meant you’re tired bad journalism but it got lost in translation.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron I find it ironic that the article mentions a new network for fact-checking, yet they publish an article without verifying the information. I find the level of journalism lamentable, not only in my country...
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron I seem to have read somewhere that they understood you blocking bluesky counted as leaving mastodon.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron
It must have been written by Grok
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron
Ils ne manquent pas d'air sur France culture. -
@Gargron who paid him?
Obviously o2switch
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron I think the journalist publishes a radio column every morning or so.
-
@Gargron
It must have been written by Grok -
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron You are completely wrong. It's John Mastodon who is still working on the project. You are just some random guy hanging around mastodon.social. Get your alternative facts right, please.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron AI is where they got this idea from. The disinformation machine.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron welcome on France Culture! One of our best cultural radio stations (or at least, it used to be)!
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
Here you can write him to let him know he "forgot" to change de audio.
And that maybe a good idea for restoring Mastodon reputation would be to make a new audio where he talks about Mastodon (and stats of how many people have moved from other places after each Big Tech scandal
) -
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron cool! You're a informatician: part information, other part magician! 🤩
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
@Gargron One guess? 'AI'
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822
Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?
