Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
-
Journal review idea: you come with me to a tech conference and listen to just one hour of my personal hallway track then we'll see what work you think matters!!!!!!!!
@grimalkina I have a wonderful image in my mind of you with a tour guide hat and flag on a stick, showing psychologists around a conference. Half tour guide half David Attenborough maybe.
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina I think software engineers underrate how often they are actually talking about psychology (or human behavioral science more generally). In my experience, it's a pretty significant proportion of the time.
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina Put it on the book jacket. Only half joking
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina "You get the amount you need, not the amount you want."
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina I did a whole PyCon keynote that was 90% psychology (and 10% typesetting history).
-
@oscarjiminy @mahryekuh @ainmosni those are usually far less psych and far more pseudoscience to be honest. Plenty to blame UX for, and UX isn't psych.
-
@oscarjiminy @mahryekuh @ainmosni those are usually far less psych and far more pseudoscience to be honest. Plenty to blame UX for, and UX isn't psych.
@grimalkina @oscarjiminy @mahryekuh @ainmosni friend worked at a newspaper in customer handling.
they had to do a 3 days course to "learn how to sell". it was by some pseudo science guru who sold "psychology".
the gist was every human is one of 4 animals (whales, sharks, owls, and dolphins).
screenshot of the website machine translated for laughs added. (original german side: https://www.tobias-beck.com/persoenlichkeitstest/)
studies? 0. sources? 0. any empiric approach? nah.
it is "trust me bro" and "customers who trust us".
not the truth prevails here, but what sounds good in some pitch meeting. -
@grimalkina I did a whole PyCon keynote that was 90% psychology (and 10% typesetting history).
@nedbat Oh what was that called, I need to watch it (is there a video?)
-
@nedbat Oh what was that called, I need to watch it (is there a video?)
@davebauerart There is! https://nedbatchelder.com/text/key23 I hope you like it.
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina I’m quite convinced that software engineers welcome a variety of points of view, thanks
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
