If you think that's a bit bloodchillingly draconian of me, here, have a reason why:
-
RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117512568357435117
If you think that's a bit bloodchillingly draconian of me, here, have a reason why:
https://time.com/article/2026/10/27/carbon-emissions-ultra-rich-oxfam-report/
To run out of billionaires, you need at least 4kms.
-
RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117512568357435117
If you think that's a bit bloodchillingly draconian of me, here, have a reason why:
https://time.com/article/2026/10/27/carbon-emissions-ultra-rich-oxfam-report/
@cstross No, I think it would be a very good starting point.
After which maybe clean up politics: you want to play? Fine: ALL your finances are open to public view, and if we find you hiding anything it's straight to jail.
-
@Uilebheist @cstross Disadvantage- giant rats fighting the seagulls.
-
@Uilebheist @cstross The nice ones. Hopefully they’ll just go into a food coma.
-
RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117512568357435117
If you think that's a bit bloodchillingly draconian of me, here, have a reason why:
https://time.com/article/2026/10/27/carbon-emissions-ultra-rich-oxfam-report/
@cstross Seems reasonable. 1 mile is 1609 metres, so that would cover the first 3,200 or so billionaires, with another 200-odd waiting for spaces to be available, or hand over their wealth until they had a few million left.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_billionaires
-
@cstross No, I think it would be a very good starting point.
After which maybe clean up politics: you want to play? Fine: ALL your finances are open to public view, and if we find you hiding anything it's straight to jail.
@Cadbury_Moose @cstross reminded of Discworld Australia, where they put politicians in jail at the start because it saves time.
-
@cstross No, I think it would be a very good starting point.
After which maybe clean up politics: you want to play? Fine: ALL your finances are open to public view, and if we find you hiding anything it's straight to jail.
@Cadbury_Moose Missing an "l" from public ...
-
To run out of billionaires, you need at least 4kms.
-
RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117512568357435117
If you think that's a bit bloodchillingly draconian of me, here, have a reason why:
https://time.com/article/2026/10/27/carbon-emissions-ultra-rich-oxfam-report/
@cstross
We can give them two options: recind 99% of your wealth, or be impaled.
That makes it fair, no?1% of a billion is still 10 million by the way, for anyone who thinks we would threaten to make them homeless.
-
To run out of billionaires, you need at least 4kms.
-
To run out of billionaires, you need at least 4kms.
-
@cstross No, I think it would be a very good starting point.
After which maybe clean up politics: you want to play? Fine: ALL your finances are open to public view, and if we find you hiding anything it's straight to jail.
@Cadbury_Moose @cstross We have the public finances law in Poland. The penalty for lying on your report when you're a member of parliament is 6 months to 8 years (though the Sejm needs to agree to lift your immunity first). The result is MPs do report their wealth and it's the source of occasional minor scandals, but no one really cares to the point where it could destroy someone's career. I get the impression people actually expect MPs to be wealthy.
-
To run out of billionaires, you need at least 4kms.
-
@HighlandLawyer @gnoll110 @cstross
2 m - is that the torso length *after* racking?
-
@Uilebheist @cstross Disadvantage- giant rats fighting the seagulls.
Advantage - giant rats fighting the seagulls for the billionaire's remaining eye.
Or testicle.Are there any women on the list?
-
@Cadbury_Moose @cstross reminded of Discworld Australia, where they put politicians in jail at the start because it saves time.
@patterfloof @Cadbury_Moose @cstross
Not Roundworld?
Shame. -
@cstross
We can give them two options: recind 99% of your wealth, or be impaled.
That makes it fair, no?1% of a billion is still 10 million by the way, for anyone who thinks we would threaten to make them homeless.
-
@HighlandLawyer @gnoll110 @cstross
2 m - is that the torso length *after* racking?
@WellsiteGeo @HighlandLawyer @gnoll110 No, it's just to leave a gap so pedestrians can slip between the row of stakes. Wouldn't want to block the souvenir shop windows!
-
Advantage - giant rats fighting the seagulls for the billionaire's remaining eye.
Or testicle.Are there any women on the list?
@WellsiteGeo @feorag @Uilebheist Yes, a minority but a significant one. (There are a small handful we can leave until last, or maybe forget about: the divorced gazillionaire ex's who're trying to give it all away.)
-
RE: https://wandering.shop/@cstross/117512568357435117
If you think that's a bit bloodchillingly draconian of me, here, have a reason why:
https://time.com/article/2026/10/27/carbon-emissions-ultra-rich-oxfam-report/
@cstross
That's just very "effective altruism" put into practice, right? I think they'll approve, it's en vogue there, I've heard.
