Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. If you believe nonviolent protest is more effective, then simply advocate for it.

If you believe nonviolent protest is more effective, then simply advocate for it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
41 Indlæg 18 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • endicottauthor@mastodon.socialE endicottauthor@mastodon.social

    @anolandria Nonviolent protest is more effective.

    dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dresstokilt@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #13

    @EndicottAuthor @anolandria how many fascist regimes has nonviolent protest toppled?

    Nonviolent protest only ever works when there is a credible threat of actual violence. When those "ceding power" can point to a nonviolent movement as the reason. MLK isn't effective without the specter of Malcom X.

    You can't nonviolent your way out of violence.

    P poisonpunk@mastodon.socialP anolandria@mastodon.socialA 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD dresstokilt@mastodon.social

      @Robo105 @anolandria It's incredibly naïve to believe that protesting completely peacefully doesn't "give them an excuse." Did you or did you not just watch them gun down an innocent woman and then call her a domestic terrorist?

      Let me be perfectly clear: they will declare martial law when and where they want. They are not waiting around for someone to shove a cop or block traffic.

      They haven't yet because the majority is still passive and going about our lives. Check back in November.

      robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      robo105@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #14

      @dresstokilt @anolandria The question is whether they have public acceptance for martial law. If the public see protesters starting fires and shooting then Trump wins but if it is peaceful then he is seen as the brute he is. Yes, both way incur death but one allows success and the other hands Trump a win. This is why Trump is trying to goad violence

      dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • wbftw@hachyderm.ioW wbftw@hachyderm.io

        @Robo105 @anolandria if they needed a dead ICE thug for an excuse, do you not think they would kill one??? These nazis are playing a zero-sum game, while you are insisting on some sort of cooperation — this is a losing strategy.

        robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        robo105@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #15

        @wbftw @anolandria Cooperation is the wrong word. Opposition should play to your strengths and Trump are military force and the protesters have public acceptance/approval. Yes, people are going to die no matter what is done but there is a growing sense that Trump and ICE are out of control. There is an old saying, 'When your enemy is busy making a mistake, don't interrupt'. Let Trump be brutal because he loses more support each day and you can't win against tanks

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • anolandria@mastodon.socialA anolandria@mastodon.social

          If you believe nonviolent protest is more effective, then simply advocate for it. The "don't give them an excuse" line is disingenuous victim blaming. They make shit up. We see it every single day, so please stop embarrassing yourself.

          "Our behavior doesn’t drive theirs."

          bensondynamics@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
          bensondynamics@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
          bensondynamics@mas.to
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #16

          @anolandria Also: the statement "They're looking for an excuse to do X" is an implicit admission that the decision has already been made. We can only control the "when."

          As you said, it's only function can be to reverse victim and offender by blaming the victim for inducing the inevitable. It does conveniently obscure the fact that we should be upset by someone looking for "an excuse."

          anolandria@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • happycrow13@mastodon.socialH happycrow13@mastodon.social

            @Robo105 @anolandria Tell that to the folks in Waco or the Branch Davidians. Or the guys on Ruby Ridge.
            The government can and will do whatever it wants, when it wants. They have drones, long distance guns and bombs. They can and will use them on the American people.
            I get being pacifist. I try to be. That privalege is swiftly coming to an end for the majority of us. I can't stand by and watch my people die anymore.

            robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            robo105@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #17

            @HappyCrow13 @anolandria The branch davidians and Waco should not be compared to protesters who are fighting for democracy. Trump has all the weapons you mention so violence is his 'trump' card' so why give him public support. Peaceful protests gain support for the protesters

            happycrow13@mastodon.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • anolandria@mastodon.socialA anolandria@mastodon.social

              If you believe nonviolent protest is more effective, then simply advocate for it. The "don't give them an excuse" line is disingenuous victim blaming. They make shit up. We see it every single day, so please stop embarrassing yourself.

              "Our behavior doesn’t drive theirs."

              P This user is from outside of this forum
              P This user is from outside of this forum
              phosphenes@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #18

              @anolandria

              It's not the fascists' opinions that matter.

              Once anti-fascists initiate violence, we lose the judges, we lose the citizens, we lose the sympathy of non-corrupt law enforcement.

              Those people's minds are the actual battlefield which determines whether we win or lose.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • robo105@mastodon.socialR robo105@mastodon.social

                @dresstokilt @anolandria The question is whether they have public acceptance for martial law. If the public see protesters starting fires and shooting then Trump wins but if it is peaceful then he is seen as the brute he is. Yes, both way incur death but one allows success and the other hands Trump a win. This is why Trump is trying to goad violence

                dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dresstokilt@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #19

                @Robo105 @anolandria I don't think you understand - the administration is going to use martial law as a scalpel, not a club. They're going to shut down major cities in swing states in November on election day in order to maintain their hold in the Senate and claim governorships. There have been no pretexts whatsoever for the times they've deployed troops in cities, they manufacture that after the fact. They always do. Those were dry runs and they worked perfectly.

                dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD robo105@mastodon.socialR teskariel@eldritch.cafeT anne_twain@theblower.auA 4 Replies Last reply
                0
                • dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD dresstokilt@mastodon.social

                  @EndicottAuthor @anolandria how many fascist regimes has nonviolent protest toppled?

                  Nonviolent protest only ever works when there is a credible threat of actual violence. When those "ceding power" can point to a nonviolent movement as the reason. MLK isn't effective without the specter of Malcom X.

                  You can't nonviolent your way out of violence.

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  phosphenes@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #20

                  @dresstokilt @EndicottAuthor @anolandria

                  Non-violence toppled Pinochet, Bolsonaro and Yoon Suk Yeol, off the top of my head. There's a longer list...

                  dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD dresstokilt@mastodon.social

                    @Robo105 @anolandria I don't think you understand - the administration is going to use martial law as a scalpel, not a club. They're going to shut down major cities in swing states in November on election day in order to maintain their hold in the Senate and claim governorships. There have been no pretexts whatsoever for the times they've deployed troops in cities, they manufacture that after the fact. They always do. Those were dry runs and they worked perfectly.

                    dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dresstokilt@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #21

                    @Robo105 @anolandria I would argue that forcing them to declare martial law early would be more disruptive to their plans than singing kumbaya in the streets.

                    Not that there's been anywhere near enough "in the streets" to begin with. We're debating the finer points of peaceful protest in the context of a nation that simply doesn't care enough at the moment to put up *any* kind of protest.

                    robo105@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P phosphenes@mastodon.social

                      @dresstokilt @EndicottAuthor @anolandria

                      Non-violence toppled Pinochet, Bolsonaro and Yoon Suk Yeol, off the top of my head. There's a longer list...

                      dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dresstokilt@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #22

                      @Phosphenes @EndicottAuthor @anolandria Bolsonaro and Yoon were ousted by democratic means before they'd had a chance to subvert those institutions and aren't relevant to this conversation. As for Pinochet, there's an entire Wikipedia article called "Armed resistance in Chile (1973-1990)."

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD dresstokilt@mastodon.social

                        @EndicottAuthor @anolandria how many fascist regimes has nonviolent protest toppled?

                        Nonviolent protest only ever works when there is a credible threat of actual violence. When those "ceding power" can point to a nonviolent movement as the reason. MLK isn't effective without the specter of Malcom X.

                        You can't nonviolent your way out of violence.

                        poisonpunk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        poisonpunk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        poisonpunk@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #23

                        @dresstokilt @EndicottAuthor @anolandria 💯🏴✊️

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • robo105@mastodon.socialR robo105@mastodon.social

                          @HappyCrow13 @anolandria The branch davidians and Waco should not be compared to protesters who are fighting for democracy. Trump has all the weapons you mention so violence is his 'trump' card' so why give him public support. Peaceful protests gain support for the protesters

                          happycrow13@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                          happycrow13@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                          happycrow13@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #24

                          @Robo105 @anolandria The Branch Davidians were peaceful folks who minded their own business. They caused no problems and were well liked The government made up lies about them, attacked and killed them
                          My point was the government needs no reason to kill you. You can be the most peaceful being on earth and they will kill you. Black folks die even more now despite being as peaceful as always. It's a grossly privileged take to say sit down and die nicely, don't cause problems
                          Pacifism is privilege

                          happycrow13@mastodon.socialH robo105@mastodon.socialR 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • happycrow13@mastodon.socialH happycrow13@mastodon.social

                            @Robo105 @anolandria The Branch Davidians were peaceful folks who minded their own business. They caused no problems and were well liked The government made up lies about them, attacked and killed them
                            My point was the government needs no reason to kill you. You can be the most peaceful being on earth and they will kill you. Black folks die even more now despite being as peaceful as always. It's a grossly privileged take to say sit down and die nicely, don't cause problems
                            Pacifism is privilege

                            happycrow13@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                            happycrow13@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                            happycrow13@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #25

                            @Robo105 @anolandria Also, the peaceful BLM protests gained supporters but no changes. In my home town literally nothing changed. White people dont like black people especially in large groups. No support for such 'violent gatherings' or 'stupid liberals' All over the country, nothing changed.
                            Support is fine and dandy. Change is what's important. I can talk all day long I support you I'll help you. It means nothing until I actually do something to help you

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD dresstokilt@mastodon.social

                              @Robo105 @anolandria It's incredibly naïve to believe that protesting completely peacefully doesn't "give them an excuse." Did you or did you not just watch them gun down an innocent woman and then call her a domestic terrorist?

                              Let me be perfectly clear: they will declare martial law when and where they want. They are not waiting around for someone to shove a cop or block traffic.

                              They haven't yet because the majority is still passive and going about our lives. Check back in November.

                              mattmerk@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mattmerk@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mattmerk@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #26

                              @dresstokilt I've been saying this for decades. After the great depression, workers rights weren't gained over a negotiating table. They were won by fighting Pinkertons in the streets.
                              The gays didn't win acceptance through peacefull conversation with cops.
                              And, and, and, and ...

                              All arguments to the contrary are just admissions of not reading or understanding history, or even more pathetic: gleeful naivete.

                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots
                              @Robo105 @anolandria

                              robo105@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mattmerk@mastodon.socialM mattmerk@mastodon.social

                                @dresstokilt I've been saying this for decades. After the great depression, workers rights weren't gained over a negotiating table. They were won by fighting Pinkertons in the streets.
                                The gays didn't win acceptance through peacefull conversation with cops.
                                And, and, and, and ...

                                All arguments to the contrary are just admissions of not reading or understanding history, or even more pathetic: gleeful naivete.

                                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots
                                @Robo105 @anolandria

                                robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                robo105@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #27

                                @MattMerk @dresstokilt @anolandria Well we were not talking about union rights but I would argue that violent resistance was only part of the work to gain workers rights. Yet, the usa has broken union rights after of Reagan. None of it works without public support. The idea of peaceful resistance is weak is a complete misreading of the how it works.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • happycrow13@mastodon.socialH happycrow13@mastodon.social

                                  @Robo105 @anolandria The Branch Davidians were peaceful folks who minded their own business. They caused no problems and were well liked The government made up lies about them, attacked and killed them
                                  My point was the government needs no reason to kill you. You can be the most peaceful being on earth and they will kill you. Black folks die even more now despite being as peaceful as always. It's a grossly privileged take to say sit down and die nicely, don't cause problems
                                  Pacifism is privilege

                                  robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  robo105@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #28

                                  @HappyCrow13 @anolandria Waco and davidians had weapons and lost. Black panthers had weapons and lost. Violence eg shooting police is what Trump needs to happen what he is trying to provoke.

                                  happycrow13@mastodon.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD dresstokilt@mastodon.social

                                    @Robo105 @anolandria I would argue that forcing them to declare martial law early would be more disruptive to their plans than singing kumbaya in the streets.

                                    Not that there's been anywhere near enough "in the streets" to begin with. We're debating the finer points of peaceful protest in the context of a nation that simply doesn't care enough at the moment to put up *any* kind of protest.

                                    robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    robo105@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #29

                                    @dresstokilt @anolandria No more kings is what is needed on an ongoing basis day after day until the regime collapses. Large number of peaceful protests is almost impossible for dictators to defeat as violence only creates more protesters

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD dresstokilt@mastodon.social

                                      @Robo105 @anolandria I don't think you understand - the administration is going to use martial law as a scalpel, not a club. They're going to shut down major cities in swing states in November on election day in order to maintain their hold in the Senate and claim governorships. There have been no pretexts whatsoever for the times they've deployed troops in cities, they manufacture that after the fact. They always do. Those were dry runs and they worked perfectly.

                                      robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      robo105@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #30

                                      @dresstokilt @anolandria If the no more kings put protests on the street day after day then it become harder for Trump to isolate people.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD dresstokilt@mastodon.social

                                        @Robo105 @anolandria I don't think you understand - the administration is going to use martial law as a scalpel, not a club. They're going to shut down major cities in swing states in November on election day in order to maintain their hold in the Senate and claim governorships. There have been no pretexts whatsoever for the times they've deployed troops in cities, they manufacture that after the fact. They always do. Those were dry runs and they worked perfectly.

                                        teskariel@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        teskariel@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        teskariel@eldritch.cafe
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #31

                                        @dresstokilt @Robo105 @anolandria It seems to me at least the elections will be the pivotal moment. They're going to try some bullshit and it is extremely important how many people see that it is bullshit, how many people believe the regime and how many people go "Well, who can really tell?" and just do nothing - because people doing nothing is enough for Trump to win.

                                        I can see the argument for keeping one's hands clean, to get mired in the swamp of "Maybe the crackdown was justified, maybe it wasn't" as little as possible, to keep as many people as possible clear-headed about what is happening and have them on your side when the time comes. Moments like Good's killing show that it is still possible to get through to people, to have a majority consensus of This Was Murder.

                                        robo105@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • teskariel@eldritch.cafeT teskariel@eldritch.cafe

                                          @dresstokilt @Robo105 @anolandria It seems to me at least the elections will be the pivotal moment. They're going to try some bullshit and it is extremely important how many people see that it is bullshit, how many people believe the regime and how many people go "Well, who can really tell?" and just do nothing - because people doing nothing is enough for Trump to win.

                                          I can see the argument for keeping one's hands clean, to get mired in the swamp of "Maybe the crackdown was justified, maybe it wasn't" as little as possible, to keep as many people as possible clear-headed about what is happening and have them on your side when the time comes. Moments like Good's killing show that it is still possible to get through to people, to have a majority consensus of This Was Murder.

                                          robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          robo105@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #32

                                          @Teskariel @dresstokilt @anolandria I would add that getting more and more people to see ICE for what it is will harden the feelings against trump and ice

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper