What if labels could help with AI too?

[dunesec@mastodon.social]

@digitaleu Why were the replies deleted or post adjusted?

The image in this post is generated by AI.

[skyblitz@kanoa.de]

@digitaleu Would Actually prefer a mandatory requirement for AI to be hosted by EU company controlled by EU Company (meaning banning US subsediary altoogether).

So EU AI regulation can be forced.

In the image of what china actually do to external company (would also prevent Tax evasion by tax optimisation Scheme).

Without of course preventing external company to make money.

[herman@mastodon.world]

@digitaleu Very good. But maybe the #EU should make some choices as well to discourage AI providers from destroying the planet.

[veza85ue@eupolicy.social]

@skyblitz "would also prevent Tax evasion by tax optimisation Scheme"

...not if Ireland/Luxembourg/Cyprus/The Netherlands can help it.

@digitaleu

[skyblitz@kanoa.de]

@Veza85UE @digitaleu i was for a law, that force company to pay tax to the country where they make the money, paying tax to a third party country is plainly stupid in my sense.

[bovine3dom@masto.ai]

@dunesec also, the grades on the energ are totally nonsensical and not the kind of mistake a human would make

AъBCEFC

@digitaleu

[unkx@icosahedron.website]

@digitaleu sorry to be ”that guy” but could you tell us why did you delete the original post and all your replies there?

[cid_terron@social.linux.pizza]

@digitaleu shouldn't AI generated content also include the other labels??
Energy and Eco labels would make quite a lot of sense ...

[digitaleu@ec.social-network.europa.eu]

Hi @unkx thank you for asking. There was a typo in the original post, and when redrafting it we ended up republishing rather than editing, which removed the previous replies. This was a genuine mistake on our part, and we apologise for the confusion.

[digitaleu@ec.social-network.europa.eu]

A note from our team: earlier today we redrafted this post to correct a typo and refine the messaging, and ended up republishing it rather than editing, which removed the original comments. This was a genuine mistake on our part and we apologise for the confusion. Every comment and opinion is welcome on our page, and under this post. We value the conversations with our community.

[unkx@icosahedron.website]

@digitaleu fair enough. Mistakes happen and there’s no shame in them.

[joneskoo@infosec.exchange]

@digitaleu I like the idea of disclosure but not implementation (icons reference). Many categories are not going to be understood by content producers or consumers. Industry has already standardized on ”AI sparkles”, so introducing a text label that doesn’t translate to all languages seems like a mistake. Another cookie regulation?

[catraxx@tech.lgbt]

@digitaleu How about the energy label and the AI label get combined so we can see how much energy was wasted on making something that very likely already existed to begin with?

[boltx@mastodon.social]

@digitaleu Of course the image in the post would be AI generated without disclosure

[ko@gotosocial.art]

@digitaleu
>post about the need for an "ai-generated label" (good)
>the image itself is ai slop

holy fucking shit you lot are incredibly incompetent and dragging EU's reputation even lower

[nelson@wetdry.world]

@ko @digitaleu bruhhhhh i didnt even notice at first lmfao

[ko@gotosocial.art]

@nelson @digitaleu how long until the glorious european regime blocks me on The Mastodon Network for an opposing opinion

[srazkvt@tech.lgbt]

@ko @digitaleu hey technically the image has the label on it so it works ?

[karcsesz@equestria.social]

@ko @digitaleu I mean, the label *is* on the picture

[karcsesz@equestria.social]

@ko @digitaleu There is no point, just wanted to be a little silly.