Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Is there a good article or thread countering this narrative that Signal (and communication of that scale) is not possible without its relience on AWS?

Is there a good article or thread countering this narrative that Signal (and communication of that scale) is not possible without its relience on AWS?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
12 Indlæg 5 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
    liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
    liaizon@social.wake.st
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    Is there a good article or thread countering this narrative that Signal (and communication of that scale) is not possible without its relience on AWS?
    https://mastodon.world/@Mer__edith/115445701583902092

    raucao@kosmos.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

      Is there a good article or thread countering this narrative that Signal (and communication of that scale) is not possible without its relience on AWS?
      https://mastodon.world/@Mer__edith/115445701583902092

      raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      raucao@kosmos.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @liaizon In short: her entire point is based on the fact that they want to be one centralized provider servicing people everywhere on the globe. Federation with many local servers would obviously scale just as well for the vast majority of their users.

      liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • raucao@kosmos.socialR raucao@kosmos.social

        @liaizon In short: her entire point is based on the fact that they want to be one centralized provider servicing people everywhere on the globe. Federation with many local servers would obviously scale just as well for the vast majority of their users.

        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
        liaizon@social.wake.st
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @raucao I want to see a reasoned technical critique of everyone of the points that she makes. And a step-by-step plan of how to counteract those points using a federated model and how that federated model would achieve the goals that she lays out.

        raucao@kosmos.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

          @raucao I want to see a reasoned technical critique of everyone of the points that she makes. And a step-by-step plan of how to counteract those points using a federated model and how that federated model would achieve the goals that she lays out.

          raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          raucao@kosmos.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @liaizon Great, but I think it's really just one point, and that is that you only need global service providers if you want to be a centralized entity providing global services, too.

          raucao@kosmos.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • raucao@kosmos.socialR raucao@kosmos.social

            @liaizon Great, but I think it's really just one point, and that is that you only need global service providers if you want to be a centralized entity providing global services, too.

            raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            raucao@kosmos.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @liaizon She picks audio/video as the main argument, because for pure messaging, a second of round trip to get to the other side of the globe and back (while being on mobile networks) is pretty much irrelevant.

            So if someone were to pick this apart, this is where they should present alternatives IMO.

            hyc@mastodon.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • raucao@kosmos.socialR raucao@kosmos.social

              @liaizon She picks audio/video as the main argument, because for pure messaging, a second of round trip to get to the other side of the globe and back (while being on mobile networks) is pretty much irrelevant.

              So if someone were to pick this apart, this is where they should present alternatives IMO.

              hyc@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              hyc@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              hyc@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @raucao @liaizon they have a centralized worldview because that's what they know. Multicast is really exactly what you need for group comms but all they use are virtual circuits, just like a telco.

              raucao@kosmos.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • hyc@mastodon.socialH hyc@mastodon.social

                @raucao @liaizon they have a centralized worldview because that's what they know. Multicast is really exactly what you need for group comms but all they use are virtual circuits, just like a telco.

                raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                raucao@kosmos.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @hyc @liaizon It's not "what they know". They made a conscious decision against federation in the early days:

                https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/

                lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.comL 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • raucao@kosmos.socialR raucao@kosmos.social

                  @hyc @liaizon It's not "what they know". They made a conscious decision against federation in the early days:

                  https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/

                  lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.comL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.comL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  @raucao @hyc @liaizon I think one point you neglect is that signal has been conceived after people already tried to kill proprietary messaging. That's the whole xmpp story. Moxxie and al. knew about xmpp and saw it has a the total failure it is. They didn't want to reproduce that. The hostility toward decentralized things does not come from nowhere, it's based on experience

                  raucao@kosmos.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.comL lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com

                    @raucao @hyc @liaizon I think one point you neglect is that signal has been conceived after people already tried to kill proprietary messaging. That's the whole xmpp story. Moxxie and al. knew about xmpp and saw it has a the total failure it is. They didn't want to reproduce that. The hostility toward decentralized things does not come from nowhere, it's based on experience

                    raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    raucao@kosmos.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9

                    @lutindiscret @hyc @liaizon How am I "neglecting" that? I literally shared that perspective in the post you're replying to.

                    It's funny you call XMPP a total failure, because I rely on it for all of my work communication and the majority of my personal comms, too. Open protocols can only be a subjective failure to you, when you're not using them. And you never know who's successfully using them, because there are no centralized statistics for that.

                    lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.comL 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • raucao@kosmos.socialR raucao@kosmos.social

                      @lutindiscret @hyc @liaizon How am I "neglecting" that? I literally shared that perspective in the post you're replying to.

                      It's funny you call XMPP a total failure, because I rely on it for all of my work communication and the majority of my personal comms, too. Open protocols can only be a subjective failure to you, when you're not using them. And you never know who's successfully using them, because there are no centralized statistics for that.

                      lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.comL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.comL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #10

                      @raucao @hyc @liaizon I'm happy you are successfuly using xmpp.

                      I'm talking about the % of the global population.

                      If I setup my self hosted xmpp server and create an account. How many people can I contact on that network? You are right we don't have stat but let's admit it's order of magnitude less than WhatsApp, signal or telegram. We can regret it, we can't deny it.

                      Moxxie always said he would be happy to be proven wrong by the success of a decentralized app. Maybe he is right 😥

                      raucao@kosmos.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.comL lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com

                        @raucao @hyc @liaizon I'm happy you are successfuly using xmpp.

                        I'm talking about the % of the global population.

                        If I setup my self hosted xmpp server and create an account. How many people can I contact on that network? You are right we don't have stat but let's admit it's order of magnitude less than WhatsApp, signal or telegram. We can regret it, we can't deny it.

                        Moxxie always said he would be happy to be proven wrong by the success of a decentralized app. Maybe he is right 😥

                        raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        raucao@kosmos.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #11

                        @lutindiscret @hyc @liaizon Again, email is right there and how many people can you reach via email? The premise was that federation *inherently* doesn't work, and that's quite obviously wrong.

                        XMPP isn't more widely used due to a lack of investment, because every new messenger funded by VC money (which Signal also was) wants to be the only game in town, or at least compete directly with the largest ones. Hardly anyone dares to invest in real freedom of choice.

                        pelle@veganism.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
                        • raucao@kosmos.socialR raucao@kosmos.social

                          @lutindiscret @hyc @liaizon Again, email is right there and how many people can you reach via email? The premise was that federation *inherently* doesn't work, and that's quite obviously wrong.

                          XMPP isn't more widely used due to a lack of investment, because every new messenger funded by VC money (which Signal also was) wants to be the only game in town, or at least compete directly with the largest ones. Hardly anyone dares to invest in real freedom of choice.

                          pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pelle@veganism.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pelle@veganism.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #12

                          @raucao @lutindiscret @hyc @liaizon@wake.st
                          #xmpp is super, but also check out #deltachat, which easy-to-use #e2ee like #signalmessenger, but #decentralized because it runs over #email (and #chatmail) servers.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper