Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things."

[daojoan@mastodon.social]

Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

[energisch_@troet.cafe]

@Daojoan strange times we live in

[ariaflame@masto.ai]

@Daojoan A man who has probably never set foot in a supermarket in his life.

[far1925@misskey.id]

@Daojoan@mastodon.social I hope we all remember Dunning Kruger effect and actually realize how little we are in knowledge.

[robinadams@mathstodon.xyz]

@Daojoan Jon Oliver: They call themselves anti-elitist then vote for a man who literally sits on a gold throne in a gold room at the top of a tall tower with his name emblazoned in gold on the outside.

[erickasimone@mastodon.social]

@Daojoan forever changing words to make themselves feel better about how stupid they are. Weird behavior.

[algocompsynth@mastodon.social]

@Daojoan Actually, it's "Man of the Peep-Hole"

[zeank@mastodon.social]

@Daojoan they can’t be arsed to take an effort and try to discredit those who do.

[ipd@universeodon.com]

@Daojoan

If he has a golden toilet, he's the man of the pee hole.

[dp0@mastodon.social]

@Daojoan It is just a new approach to an old dilemma: Authoritarianism is based on fraud and fraud requires intellectual superiority; i.e., the fraudster needs to know something the deceived doesn't. Hence, knowledgeable people are a threat for autocrats.

In the past, access to knowledge was limited, most people couldn't even read. But things have changed and education and knowledge are more accessible. So they've to "pollute" the knowledge through fake information and to shame knowledge.

[catriona@tech.lgbt]

@Daojoan The thing that burns me up is that there is a relationship between education and class, but that is not an inevitability; it is a choice made by the right-wing.

The left wants to extend the opportunity of education to everyone, and for that they're called elitist, while the people who insist on gatekeeping education as a privilege for the rich are salt of the earth. It's entirely backwards.

[linear@nya.social]

@Daojoan@mastodon.social there was a time when extensive knowledge of things was something only easily attainable to the elites. that time is now past, yet we still have not shaken ourselves of the patterns we collectively learned to recognize. this benefits the new elites, and so they perpetuate it. i hope we can learn from this soon.

[halaana@mastodon.social]

@ariaflame There's actual royalty from major countries that are more connected to people's daily lives.

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@Daojoan

we're getting palantir toilets soon so...

[cy@fedicy.us.to]

That's sure not how I use the term elitist, but yeah. People are so easily swayed by a down home country accent.

What's her name at PhilosophyTube has a pretty interesting angle on what's happening here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqPd6MShV1o

Not entirely people's fault, but definitely working against any hope of our future existence.

[flipper@mastodonapp.uk]

@Daojoan Friends with a billionaire pedo fixer? Elitist.

Oh, wait, that one still works.

[mrundkvist@archaeo.social]

@DP0 @Daojoan
Sorry, no. Poor people in Sweden have had excellent access to information and education for 80 years. The fascist voters have turned away willingly from that and prefer online propaganda channels.

#fascism #democracy

[trimtab@mastodon.social]

@ariaflame @Daojoan
Indeed. A man who talked about groceries as if he had only learned the word for the first time a few minutes before his speech....

[nini@oldbytes.space]

@Daojoan So they're anti-intellectualists but calling folk "intellectuals" has too many syllables so it's just "elitist".

[nicolai@babka.social]

@Daojoan what it really means is „has access to methods of thinking that not all people have but which are seen as mandatory for being heard and being able to speak politically“. And that is a real cause that unfortunately mostly terrible people really for. Other people do not really rally for it because it is an uncomfortable truth that one actually needs that method and that we indeed exclude people who can’t use it and that there is no good answer that could make them feel actually able to participate instead of just technically able to participate but without any chance of being heard.