Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. HEY.

HEY.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
59 Indlæg 37 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • psychuan@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
    psychuan@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
    psychuan@plush.city
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    HEY.

    whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

    - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

    - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

    - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

    0x4d6165@transfem.social0 sallystrange@eldritch.cafeS foolishowl@social.coopF sarenth@pagan.plusS vocumsineratio@hachyderm.ioV 22 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

      HEY.

      whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

      - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

      - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

      - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

      0x4d6165@transfem.social0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0x4d6165@transfem.social0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0x4d6165@transfem.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @PsyChuan@plush.city also the people who run around talking about the tragedy of the commons are the ones who are the most greedy. like come on man

      psychuan@plush.cityP oblomov@sociale.networkO matildalove@wetdry.worldM 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • 0x4d6165@transfem.social0 0x4d6165@transfem.social

        @PsyChuan@plush.city also the people who run around talking about the tragedy of the commons are the ones who are the most greedy. like come on man

        psychuan@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
        psychuan@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
        psychuan@plush.city
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @0x4d6165 yeah, the ones who most often go "oh but that won't work because of the tragedy of the commons!" are the ones that stand to benefit most from privatisation.

        0x4d6165@transfem.social0 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

          @0x4d6165 yeah, the ones who most often go "oh but that won't work because of the tragedy of the commons!" are the ones that stand to benefit most from privatisation.

          0x4d6165@transfem.social0 This user is from outside of this forum
          0x4d6165@transfem.social0 This user is from outside of this forum
          0x4d6165@transfem.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @PsyChuan@plush.city they're telling on themselves

          alpinefolk@sunbeam.cityA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

            HEY.

            whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

            - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

            - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

            - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

            sallystrange@eldritch.cafeS This user is from outside of this forum
            sallystrange@eldritch.cafeS This user is from outside of this forum
            sallystrange@eldritch.cafe
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @PsyChuan the only real tragedy of the commons is their enclosure

            corbden@defcon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

              HEY.

              whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

              - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

              - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

              - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

              foolishowl@social.coopF This user is from outside of this forum
              foolishowl@social.coopF This user is from outside of this forum
              foolishowl@social.coop
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #6

              @PsyChuan Obligatory mention of The Dawn of Everything, by David Graeber and David Wengrow.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                HEY.

                whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                sarenth@pagan.plusS This user is from outside of this forum
                sarenth@pagan.plusS This user is from outside of this forum
                sarenth@pagan.plus
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #7

                @PsyChuan

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 0x4d6165@transfem.social0 0x4d6165@transfem.social

                  @PsyChuan@plush.city also the people who run around talking about the tragedy of the commons are the ones who are the most greedy. like come on man

                  oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oblomov@sociale.network
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #8

                  @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan unsurprising. It's obviously projection

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                    HEY.

                    whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                    - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                    - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                    - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                    vocumsineratio@hachyderm.ioV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vocumsineratio@hachyderm.ioV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vocumsineratio@hachyderm.io
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #9

                    @PsyChuan

                    My apologies for the ask:

                    What's the right starting point for reading Ostrom's work? Her 1990 "Governing the Commons" paper, or do I need to go further back than that?

                    econproph@mastodon.socialE nicopap@tooting.chN 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • sallystrange@eldritch.cafeS sallystrange@eldritch.cafe

                      @PsyChuan the only real tragedy of the commons is their enclosure

                      corbden@defcon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      corbden@defcon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      corbden@defcon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #10

                      @SallyStrange @PsyChuan Yeah, I feel like that's the tragedy itself. Someone DID come along and steal the commons. And then justified it with the theory. But it did happen.

                      One of those paradoxical thoughts.

                      sabik@rants.auS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                        HEY.

                        whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                        - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                        - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                        - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                        dalius_berger@plush.cityD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalius_berger@plush.cityD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalius_berger@plush.city
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #11

                        @PsyChuan I think there are two ways to view that term:
                        (A): "you can trust citizens with free stuff"
                        (B): "you can't trust corporations with free stuff"

                        (A) is used to argue against public transport, welfare, healthcare system, affordable housing and the terrible belief that monetizing everything is a solution to fairly distribute resources.

                        But (B) is just the observation of corporate greed.

                        davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                          HEY.

                          whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                          - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                          - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                          - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                          yakmacker@society.kalli.stY This user is from outside of this forum
                          yakmacker@society.kalli.stY This user is from outside of this forum
                          yakmacker@society.kalli.st
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #12
                          @PsyChuan but think of all that unproductive land that could be generating value. Don't you want the number to go up? 😞
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • vocumsineratio@hachyderm.ioV vocumsineratio@hachyderm.io

                            @PsyChuan

                            My apologies for the ask:

                            What's the right starting point for reading Ostrom's work? Her 1990 "Governing the Commons" paper, or do I need to go further back than that?

                            econproph@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            econproph@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            econproph@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #13

                            @vocumsineratio @PsyChuan
                            Re: "right starting point for reading Ostom.."
                            Depends on your background. If you have some advanced formal econ or poly sci bckgrnd, then start w/ the paper, --> Governing the Commons book.
                            Then for more: -->Rules, Games, & Common Pool Resources ('94 w/ Gardner & walker) --> Understanding Inst Diversity.
                            She didn't write for gen'l audience, so you may want to make your start w/ a bio of her (either Tarko or Nordman).

                            Hope this helps.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                              HEY.

                              whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                              - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                              - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                              - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                              edwiebe@scribili.masto.hostE This user is from outside of this forum
                              edwiebe@scribili.masto.hostE This user is from outside of this forum
                              edwiebe@scribili.masto.host
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #14

                              @PsyChuan The atmosphere is a commons. We all use it to breathe and generally rely on it not to change too much.

                              Many people dump CO2 into the atmosphere, changing its properties and behaviour, leading to harm.

                              Everyone experiences the harm, including those who don't change the atmosphere.

                              Some people dump much, much more than others but face no additional costs.

                              If this isn't a tragedy of a commons I don't know what it is.

                              whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                                HEY.

                                whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                                - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                                - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                                - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                                asakiyume@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
                                asakiyume@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
                                asakiyume@wandering.shop
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #15

                                @PsyChuan I am reading Elinor Ostrom right now on this!!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 0x4d6165@transfem.social0 0x4d6165@transfem.social

                                  @PsyChuan@plush.city also the people who run around talking about the tragedy of the commons are the ones who are the most greedy. like come on man

                                  matildalove@wetdry.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  matildalove@wetdry.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  matildalove@wetdry.world
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #16

                                  @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan "if you let everyone share freely, some jerk will obviously ruin it" —jerk who wants nothing more than to ruin it

                                  nske@ravenation.clubN gooba42@mastodon.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                                    HEY.

                                    whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                                    - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                                    - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                                    - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                                    davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #17

                                    @PsyChuan and people keep invoking it when they're actually talking about enclosure. Like how the internet as people use it exists at the whim of a few companies.

                                    (Possibly what inspired your post? Not new info to anyone here in any case. Just AAAARGH)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • vocumsineratio@hachyderm.ioV vocumsineratio@hachyderm.io

                                      @PsyChuan

                                      My apologies for the ask:

                                      What's the right starting point for reading Ostrom's work? Her 1990 "Governing the Commons" paper, or do I need to go further back than that?

                                      nicopap@tooting.chN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nicopap@tooting.chN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nicopap@tooting.ch
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #18

                                      @vocumsineratio @PsyChuan the start and end of the books might be a bit thick in economic modelling, and might feel offputting. But after the first chapter, it's just practical examples after practical examples that are quite fascinating.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                                        HEY.

                                        whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                                        - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                                        - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                                        - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                                        aurochs@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aurochs@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aurochs@todon.eu
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #19

                                        @PsyChuan The tragedy of the commons is absolutely real and a real problem. There are milions of exsmples.
                                        It is the capitalist solution to it that is bulshit.

                                        whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dalius_berger@plush.cityD dalius_berger@plush.city

                                          @PsyChuan I think there are two ways to view that term:
                                          (A): "you can trust citizens with free stuff"
                                          (B): "you can't trust corporations with free stuff"

                                          (A) is used to argue against public transport, welfare, healthcare system, affordable housing and the terrible belief that monetizing everything is a solution to fairly distribute resources.

                                          But (B) is just the observation of corporate greed.

                                          davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #20

                                          @dalius_berger @PsyChuan there was a controversy in the Republic of Ireland because water was unmetered and free so OBVIOUSLY people were squandering it.

                                          A coalition including the Green Party began to roll out metering and set up a utility to charge people. It got massive popular resistance and was ultimately defeated, but the meters did go in.

                                          When the dust settled it turned out Irish people used less water on average than the metered, privatised. UK.

                                          Metering did help find leaks though.

                                          davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD nacly@floss.socialN 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper