Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The fallout from "No, not Hank Green using that AI" is at the stage where people are debating if "canceling" people is bad.

The fallout from "No, not Hank Green using that AI" is at the stage where people are debating if "canceling" people is bad.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
66 Indlæg 29 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    I legit think the doomers and boosters come from the same source at this point, just with different flavors of the same message that may resonate with different groups of people.

    You won't buy that AI will save the world and grant wishes? Maybe you'll go for "it's so dangerous" ... and therefore still must be very powerful and effective.

    maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    maddiem4@raphus.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    maddiem4@raphus.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #7

    @futurebird It's been quasi-religious (at least) for a long time now, so of course it has the same trappings of Christians having differences of approach whether they focus on God as loving father, power-justified tyrant, or some combination of the two, but recreating the Predator handshake meme in their agreement that God is omnipotent.

    All the more reason it's clearly nonsense (which is terrifying to see people fall for) for anyone outside the reality distortion bubble where emotions motivate belief in some kind of Turbo Pascal's Wager.

    datarama@hachyderm.ioD ehproque@neopaquita.esE morgan@sfba.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      The fallout from "No, not Hank Green using that AI" is at the stage where people are debating if "canceling" people is bad.

      This because about 10k people unsubscribed from his youTube channel, something that probably caused him to take stock and leave the internet for a bit.

      Unsubscribing from a youTube channel isn't "canceling" someone. Can we all calm down please?

      Also, that he used AI isn't really the big issue, it has just formed a concise talking point around something bigger.

      cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      cstamp@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #8

      @futurebird It’s as if some folk feel they are owed an audience. Folk will support folk they want to support.

      futurebird@sauropods.winF kichae@wanderingadventure.partyK 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        I legit think the doomers and boosters come from the same source at this point, just with different flavors of the same message that may resonate with different groups of people.

        You won't buy that AI will save the world and grant wishes? Maybe you'll go for "it's so dangerous" ... and therefore still must be very powerful and effective.

        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
        futurebird@sauropods.win
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #9

        Oh! If you don't know what "Pivot" is? Let me tell you about it: The name is a play on the phrase "Pivot to video" from the famous attempt to shut down print media and increase ad revenue. It's short hand for a bait and switch.

        Pivot is basically the local news around here for tech topics and markets. David is a cool dude who is bad at interior decorating and he just interviewed Molly White.

        https://pivot-to-ai.com/

        datarama@hachyderm.ioD muddle@infosec.exchangeM somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT 4 Replies Last reply
        0
        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

          Oh! If you don't know what "Pivot" is? Let me tell you about it: The name is a play on the phrase "Pivot to video" from the famous attempt to shut down print media and increase ad revenue. It's short hand for a bait and switch.

          Pivot is basically the local news around here for tech topics and markets. David is a cool dude who is bad at interior decorating and he just interviewed Molly White.

          https://pivot-to-ai.com/

          datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          datarama@hachyderm.io
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #10

          @futurebird i personally think that (cool + interior decorating) = K, where K is a universal human constant.

          (kind regards from a dude who's pretty good at interior decorating and also almost pathologically uncool.)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • maddiem4@raphus.socialM maddiem4@raphus.social

            @futurebird It's been quasi-religious (at least) for a long time now, so of course it has the same trappings of Christians having differences of approach whether they focus on God as loving father, power-justified tyrant, or some combination of the two, but recreating the Predator handshake meme in their agreement that God is omnipotent.

            All the more reason it's clearly nonsense (which is terrifying to see people fall for) for anyone outside the reality distortion bubble where emotions motivate belief in some kind of Turbo Pascal's Wager.

            datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            datarama@hachyderm.io
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #11

            @MaddieM4 @futurebird

            > Turbo Pascal's Wager

            OK, this is now my favourite description of that belief.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

              I've only really seen Pivot to AI pick up on this, but Hank Green has some tangental involvement with "Effective Alturists." One big aspect of Effective altruism (EA) is AI doomerism. AI is a world changing technology (they believe) and we need to take it seriously in *that* way or ... terrible things may happen.

              That doomerism is also a different kind of effective marketing for AI concerns me deeply.

              mycrowgirl@flipping.rocksM This user is from outside of this forum
              mycrowgirl@flipping.rocksM This user is from outside of this forum
              mycrowgirl@flipping.rocks
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #12

              @futurebird the HG knitting fiasco (and his non-apology for how badly he fucked that entire situation up) is what finally drove me to block his content all together.

              Just another dude who parrots whatever the echochamber says, and deflects responsibility when it invariably bites him in the ass.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cstamp@mastodon.socialC cstamp@mastodon.social

                @futurebird It’s as if some folk feel they are owed an audience. Folk will support folk they want to support.

                futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                futurebird@sauropods.win
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #13

                @CStamp

                To be fair to Hank Green, which people probably do too much, *he* was not whining about this. Some of his fans are doing it. If it came from him that would be much worse.

                Recovery is possible but for me the first step would be to *report* on what the EA people are all about. What did they try to teach you those meetings? How did it work? Help other people avoid it.

                That would be the right move.

                cstamp@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                  @CStamp

                  To be fair to Hank Green, which people probably do too much, *he* was not whining about this. Some of his fans are doing it. If it came from him that would be much worse.

                  Recovery is possible but for me the first step would be to *report* on what the EA people are all about. What did they try to teach you those meetings? How did it work? Help other people avoid it.

                  That would be the right move.

                  cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cstamp@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #14

                  @futurebird I had to look him up. I guess it depends on how he’s using it. I don’t trust any “knowledge” that is produced with AI, so I am predisposed to not trust what he shows.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                    The fallout from "No, not Hank Green using that AI" is at the stage where people are debating if "canceling" people is bad.

                    This because about 10k people unsubscribed from his youTube channel, something that probably caused him to take stock and leave the internet for a bit.

                    Unsubscribing from a youTube channel isn't "canceling" someone. Can we all calm down please?

                    Also, that he used AI isn't really the big issue, it has just formed a concise talking point around something bigger.

                    dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dalias@hachyderm.io
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #15

                    @futurebird I deem it a completely different thing than "cancelling".

                    "Canceling" is when we stop engaging with media we previously enjoyed because supporting the person who created it (financially or reputationally) is too odious or because something we know about them now has soured our interpretation of what they created.

                    Dropping a YouTuber because he's pivoted to AI slop is just a matter of the content itself no longer being fit for consumption.

                    futurebird@sauropods.winF 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                      The fallout from "No, not Hank Green using that AI" is at the stage where people are debating if "canceling" people is bad.

                      This because about 10k people unsubscribed from his youTube channel, something that probably caused him to take stock and leave the internet for a bit.

                      Unsubscribing from a youTube channel isn't "canceling" someone. Can we all calm down please?

                      Also, that he used AI isn't really the big issue, it has just formed a concise talking point around something bigger.

                      wendigo@metalhead.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wendigo@metalhead.clubW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wendigo@metalhead.club
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #16

                      @futurebird I agree 100% with you. It's attacking the messaging in any way that boosts AI and it's credibility. Saviour or sinner. As a professional, I know that AI is not only not AI, it is rather a sophistacted computer that does what it is told via machine learning concepts such as the prompt. Nothing broke containment. Nothing hacked anything on its own. It was programmed (prompted) to do so and given the resources. It's a huge scam, and embarrassingly so. But in Trump's world, they know nobody will hold them to account. They can make up whatever shit they want.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                        I legit think the doomers and boosters come from the same source at this point, just with different flavors of the same message that may resonate with different groups of people.

                        You won't buy that AI will save the world and grant wishes? Maybe you'll go for "it's so dangerous" ... and therefore still must be very powerful and effective.

                        exchgr@mastodon.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                        exchgr@mastodon.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                        exchgr@mastodon.world
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #17

                        @futurebird they are often literally the same person https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/no-freedom-openai-boss-sam-altman-sparks-frenzy-after-dystopian-prediction/news-story/837f91f37c101f422cac77ec5eb2764f

                        lrhodes@merveilles.townL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                          @futurebird I deem it a completely different thing than "cancelling".

                          "Canceling" is when we stop engaging with media we previously enjoyed because supporting the person who created it (financially or reputationally) is too odious or because something we know about them now has soured our interpretation of what they created.

                          Dropping a YouTuber because he's pivoted to AI slop is just a matter of the content itself no longer being fit for consumption.

                          futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                          futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                          futurebird@sauropods.win
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #18

                          @dalias

                          It does not spark joy.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jstevenyork@mastodon.socialJ jstevenyork@mastodon.social

                            @futurebird
                            I really like Hank Green, and this turn really bothers me. I don't even want to investigate it too closely because I know it's going to change how I feel about his stuff.

                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.io
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #19

                            @jstevenyork @futurebird Then that's why it's important to do.

                            Disregarding a nobody you never cared about is easy - it's the default.

                            Unpacking what someone who's acted unethically has fed you through their position of information influence is a lot harder but actually matters.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                              I legit think the doomers and boosters come from the same source at this point, just with different flavors of the same message that may resonate with different groups of people.

                              You won't buy that AI will save the world and grant wishes? Maybe you'll go for "it's so dangerous" ... and therefore still must be very powerful and effective.

                              lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.net
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #20

                              @futurebird I hadn't heard of Hank Green before. I agree to your points anyway.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                                @futurebird I deem it a completely different thing than "cancelling".

                                "Canceling" is when we stop engaging with media we previously enjoyed because supporting the person who created it (financially or reputationally) is too odious or because something we know about them now has soured our interpretation of what they created.

                                Dropping a YouTuber because he's pivoted to AI slop is just a matter of the content itself no longer being fit for consumption.

                                futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                futurebird@sauropods.win
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #21

                                @dalias

                                Really one of the things that gives me hope for the future is that just disliking AI is so popular even among people who don't know about some of the deeper reasons. I think there is another group of people who are more quiet about not liking it but they have a big fear of not being seen as up to date or able to adapt and use new technology.

                                The money to promote this stuff is all over the place. Nearly everyone I know has had an education session at work about it.

                                That is WILD.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                  Oh! If you don't know what "Pivot" is? Let me tell you about it: The name is a play on the phrase "Pivot to video" from the famous attempt to shut down print media and increase ad revenue. It's short hand for a bait and switch.

                                  Pivot is basically the local news around here for tech topics and markets. David is a cool dude who is bad at interior decorating and he just interviewed Molly White.

                                  https://pivot-to-ai.com/

                                  muddle@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  muddle@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  muddle@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #22

                                  @futurebird It also has a meaning in infosec, when working with indicators of compromise. AFAIUI, anyway. I think in the sense that you might "pivot to effective altruism" to learn more about HG. If he was a threat actor.

                                  (disclaimer: I'm not an infosec guy, but I've done a bit of reading in related areas)

                                  futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • muddle@infosec.exchangeM muddle@infosec.exchange

                                    @futurebird It also has a meaning in infosec, when working with indicators of compromise. AFAIUI, anyway. I think in the sense that you might "pivot to effective altruism" to learn more about HG. If he was a threat actor.

                                    (disclaimer: I'm not an infosec guy, but I've done a bit of reading in related areas)

                                    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    futurebird@sauropods.win
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #23

                                    @muddle

                                    The worst thing about Pivot is it is some deep tech people inside baseball stuff an only the people who know know.

                                    That might need to change.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                      Oh! If you don't know what "Pivot" is? Let me tell you about it: The name is a play on the phrase "Pivot to video" from the famous attempt to shut down print media and increase ad revenue. It's short hand for a bait and switch.

                                      Pivot is basically the local news around here for tech topics and markets. David is a cool dude who is bad at interior decorating and he just interviewed Molly White.

                                      https://pivot-to-ai.com/

                                      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #24

                                      @futurebird I adore Molly White.

                                      futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.socialS somevegancheeseisok@mastodon.social

                                        @futurebird I adore Molly White.

                                        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        futurebird@sauropods.win
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #25

                                        @SomeVeganCheeseIsOk

                                        She is such a super star AND a real one.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                          Oh! If you don't know what "Pivot" is? Let me tell you about it: The name is a play on the phrase "Pivot to video" from the famous attempt to shut down print media and increase ad revenue. It's short hand for a bait and switch.

                                          Pivot is basically the local news around here for tech topics and markets. David is a cool dude who is bad at interior decorating and he just interviewed Molly White.

                                          https://pivot-to-ai.com/

                                          tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tuban_muzuru@beige.party
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #26

                                          @futurebird

                                          Claude Opus and I are going to write up a neural net for AI Bullshit Detection

                                          Most of the Pro- camp don't understand how a Transformer works and absolutely none of the Anti- camp get it, either.

                                          tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper