The Society of Authors (UK) is helping launch this: an identifier for human-authored (i.e. non-AI) books: https://humanauthored.co.uk/

[ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu]

@datarama @cstross I do as well, and everyone in my bubble does as well, but then again, I've also been picky about my bubble, and I'm assuming the worst from outside it.

[lemmus@social.vivaldi.net]

@ainmosni @datarama @cstross

_My_ field requires human finesse and insight, but those other fields are perfectly well served with AI slop. Which makes it really fascinating how many developers willingly destroy their code bases with slop. (Some are forced to, but many enough do it eagerly and willingly...) (Yes, I'm a developer. Yes, I refuse to work with genAI.)

[datarama@hachyderm.io]

@Lemmus @ainmosni @cstross I'm in that boat too, but I think it's a matter of time before I'm pushed out of the industry (inasmuch as the industry survives at all).

[lemmus@social.vivaldi.net]

@datarama

Yeah, interesting times, indeed...

[ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu]

@datarama @Lemmus @cstross It depends, it's all built on a massive amount of subsidies, and even then, it looks like it's already doing more damage than even the slop pushers are willing to tolerate (although they're still in denial).

I wouldn't be surprised if it goes the way you say, but also not if this ends blowing up in their faces.

[datarama@hachyderm.io]

@ainmosni @Lemmus @cstross I really don't know. And that scares me, to be honest. The slop machines got a lot better than I thought they would, and also they improved faster than I thought they would.

Software dev is basically the only thing I can do, so if the entire field does get steamrolled by AI, I'm pretty screwed.

But hey: *Usually* the smart money isn't on the very worried guy who happens to have a clinical anxiety disorder or two being right. I could well be wrong!