Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Disabled people were among the first victims of the Nazis.

Disabled people were among the first victims of the Nazis.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
37 Indlæg 16 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    Disabled people were among the first victims of the Nazis. What I did not know was that this program of eugenics through murder was very furtive at first. They knew that "do gooders" and "the church" would object to killing disabled people, often children just to save money.

    They were careful not to have too many deaths at any one center at first. But as the stress of war created further chaos they become more open about these murders.

    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.win
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #2

    Thinking about it, it doesn't make sense that they would be open about doing such a thing. There were people who objected. Those people were called sentimental and unreasonable. And of course the murders would expand.

    The killing centers were disguised as care facilities. Sometimes they billed families for months after their relative was dead.

    emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE burnitdown@beige.partyB futurebird@sauropods.winF 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      Disabled people were among the first victims of the Nazis. What I did not know was that this program of eugenics through murder was very furtive at first. They knew that "do gooders" and "the church" would object to killing disabled people, often children just to save money.

      They were careful not to have too many deaths at any one center at first. But as the stress of war created further chaos they become more open about these murders.

      gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
      gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
      gustavinobevilacqua@mastodon.cisti.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #3

      @futurebird

      In 2011 an Italian actor and director, Marco Paolini, made an impressive theatrical piece about Aktion T4.

      A lot of people didn't know that.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        Thinking about it, it doesn't make sense that they would be open about doing such a thing. There were people who objected. Those people were called sentimental and unreasonable. And of course the murders would expand.

        The killing centers were disguised as care facilities. Sometimes they billed families for months after their relative was dead.

        emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE This user is from outside of this forum
        emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE This user is from outside of this forum
        emilychwiggy@mastodon.art
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #4

        @futurebird a lot of the people killed also still had a family that loved their disabled relatives. It's hard to tell a family member the truth about killing their child / sibling / etc. So they made up "reasonable" death certificates and often handed relatives some ash

        futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE emilychwiggy@mastodon.art

          @futurebird a lot of the people killed also still had a family that loved their disabled relatives. It's hard to tell a family member the truth about killing their child / sibling / etc. So they made up "reasonable" death certificates and often handed relatives some ash

          futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
          futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
          futurebird@sauropods.win
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #5

          @emilychwiggy

          The centers also collected state pensions and social security for months after killing the people sent there for care. So they were very scammy in a way that I don't think we recognize enough in the Nazis, one state sponsored but privatized operation mooching off of public benefits.

          That I have heard more about "welfare moms" than this in my life is something to ponder.

          emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE burnitdown@beige.partyB thesunnyone@eldritch.cafeT quasit@kolektiva.socialQ 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

            @emilychwiggy

            The centers also collected state pensions and social security for months after killing the people sent there for care. So they were very scammy in a way that I don't think we recognize enough in the Nazis, one state sponsored but privatized operation mooching off of public benefits.

            That I have heard more about "welfare moms" than this in my life is something to ponder.

            emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE This user is from outside of this forum
            emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE This user is from outside of this forum
            emilychwiggy@mastodon.art
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #6

            @futurebird yeah there's always a lot of corruption in what the nazis did: Embezzled money, misappropriated funds, stolen valuables. And it's rarely talked about because it feels so miniscule compared to the horrific crimes, but I think it's a common feature of strongly hierarchical political systems. No, a strong man at the top of government doesn't make it more efficient. He's more likely to create the perfect climate for bottomless money pits

            futurebird@sauropods.winF burnitdown@beige.partyB 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE emilychwiggy@mastodon.art

              @futurebird yeah there's always a lot of corruption in what the nazis did: Embezzled money, misappropriated funds, stolen valuables. And it's rarely talked about because it feels so miniscule compared to the horrific crimes, but I think it's a common feature of strongly hierarchical political systems. No, a strong man at the top of government doesn't make it more efficient. He's more likely to create the perfect climate for bottomless money pits

              futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
              futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
              futurebird@sauropods.win
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #7

              @emilychwiggy

              Unfortunately I've heard people say that our Stephen Miller could not have such evil ambitions because he is a part of a regime that is too petty and criminal and the nazis were more "ideological"

              I think this is a troubling trend where people believe that the nazis were "at least efficient" which is just ingesting their old propaganda uncritically.

              emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE bewo001@darmstadt.socialB G T 4 Replies Last reply
              0
              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                @emilychwiggy

                Unfortunately I've heard people say that our Stephen Miller could not have such evil ambitions because he is a part of a regime that is too petty and criminal and the nazis were more "ideological"

                I think this is a troubling trend where people believe that the nazis were "at least efficient" which is just ingesting their old propaganda uncritically.

                emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE This user is from outside of this forum
                emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE This user is from outside of this forum
                emilychwiggy@mastodon.art
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #8

                @futurebird the nazis were incredibly prolific in disseminating propaganda that people would still believe 90 years later. From the efficient governing, over the consistent ideology, to the "german" engineering of the war machine

                But like they were full of people with idiosyncratic ideas and beliefs, full of yes men only out for personal benefit.

                Himmler was obsessed with some weird germanic pseudo myth,
                Hitler with impractical architecture…

                burnitdown@beige.partyB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                  @emilychwiggy

                  Unfortunately I've heard people say that our Stephen Miller could not have such evil ambitions because he is a part of a regime that is too petty and criminal and the nazis were more "ideological"

                  I think this is a troubling trend where people believe that the nazis were "at least efficient" which is just ingesting their old propaganda uncritically.

                  bewo001@darmstadt.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bewo001@darmstadt.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bewo001@darmstadt.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #9

                  @futurebird @emilychwiggy but there's also an important lesson. There was resistance against T4. Resistance significant enough for the regime to suspend the murdering of that group of people. Not resisting against the murder of other groups was a choice.

                  futurebird@sauropods.winF 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • bewo001@darmstadt.socialB bewo001@darmstadt.social

                    @futurebird @emilychwiggy but there's also an important lesson. There was resistance against T4. Resistance significant enough for the regime to suspend the murdering of that group of people. Not resisting against the murder of other groups was a choice.

                    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                    futurebird@sauropods.win
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #10

                    @bewo001 @emilychwiggy

                    They gave the appearance of "suspending" it but they went back to doing it not long after, this only really helped people who were Catholic and had family.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                      Thinking about it, it doesn't make sense that they would be open about doing such a thing. There were people who objected. Those people were called sentimental and unreasonable. And of course the murders would expand.

                      The killing centers were disguised as care facilities. Sometimes they billed families for months after their relative was dead.

                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                      burnitdown@beige.party
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #11

                      @futurebird

                      you can see the exact same kind of manipulation and obstruction happening with ICE. they're cowardly pieces of shit, so they wait till you're alone and can't defend yourself.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                        Disabled people were among the first victims of the Nazis. What I did not know was that this program of eugenics through murder was very furtive at first. They knew that "do gooders" and "the church" would object to killing disabled people, often children just to save money.

                        They were careful not to have too many deaths at any one center at first. But as the stress of war created further chaos they become more open about these murders.

                        nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #12

                        @futurebird Speaking of "the church" I know they eventually established a state religion with changes (this was the thing that finally set Niemoller off after he watched his neighbors get taken and killed but ignored it — even supported it.) I wonder if towards the end they basically were having it preached religiously that they must murder anyone who didn't fit the "ideal" criteria?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                          @emilychwiggy

                          The centers also collected state pensions and social security for months after killing the people sent there for care. So they were very scammy in a way that I don't think we recognize enough in the Nazis, one state sponsored but privatized operation mooching off of public benefits.

                          That I have heard more about "welfare moms" than this in my life is something to ponder.

                          burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                          burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                          burnitdown@beige.party
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #13

                          @futurebird @emilychwiggy

                          it's one of the dark secrets of white "moderate" society. but you can find it sometimes. here's Utah Phillips reciting an anonymous poem from George Milburn's 1930 book, The Hobo's Hornbook. he often gave little speeches to explain what he was talking about, and give some historical context:

                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSqX5rDhl8o

                          adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE emilychwiggy@mastodon.art

                            @futurebird yeah there's always a lot of corruption in what the nazis did: Embezzled money, misappropriated funds, stolen valuables. And it's rarely talked about because it feels so miniscule compared to the horrific crimes, but I think it's a common feature of strongly hierarchical political systems. No, a strong man at the top of government doesn't make it more efficient. He's more likely to create the perfect climate for bottomless money pits

                            burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                            burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                            burnitdown@beige.party
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #14

                            @emilychwiggy @futurebird

                            it's a conversation that requires asking "yes, and?"

                            they put millions of Jewish people in death camps, they stole as many Jewish possessions as they could, but what did they do what they stole? where did it go?

                            there is a little possible clue in the Peaky Blinders movie, or at least it's something that made me think about this. if you haven't seen it, the story of the movie is about how the nazis counterfeit printed hundreds of millions of British five pound notes to try to crash the British economy, and what Tommy does to stop them. the notes are moved in trucks full of luggage cases. where could they have got all of those luggage cases? if it's what really happened, we can look to Auschwitz for where they got the cases.

                            there are other bits and pieces to pick out of The Zone Of Interest, if you can stomach watching that one.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • burnitdown@beige.partyB burnitdown@beige.party

                              @futurebird @emilychwiggy

                              it's one of the dark secrets of white "moderate" society. but you can find it sometimes. here's Utah Phillips reciting an anonymous poem from George Milburn's 1930 book, The Hobo's Hornbook. he often gave little speeches to explain what he was talking about, and give some historical context:

                              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSqX5rDhl8o

                              adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              adrianriskin@kolektiva.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #15

                              @burnitdown @futurebird @emilychwiggy

                              Great story! I thought he told an abbreviated version of this on his album We Have Fed You All For A Thousand Years but now I can't find it. I know I've heard the part about handing your brain over to someone for eight hours a day. The long version in this clip is excellent!

                              burnitdown@beige.partyB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                @emilychwiggy

                                The centers also collected state pensions and social security for months after killing the people sent there for care. So they were very scammy in a way that I don't think we recognize enough in the Nazis, one state sponsored but privatized operation mooching off of public benefits.

                                That I have heard more about "welfare moms" than this in my life is something to ponder.

                                thesunnyone@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thesunnyone@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thesunnyone@eldritch.cafe
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #16

                                @futurebird @emilychwiggy over the past few years in the UK we've had at least a couple local councils found to be talking about "warehousing" disabled people:

                                https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/25/warehouse-disabled-people-bristol-city-council

                                Which, as a disabled person in the UK living somewhat locally to these areas, has been terrifying to watch (especially given these are just tge ones we know about, and because I've wstched peopke brush this off as unimportant)

                                futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • thesunnyone@eldritch.cafeT thesunnyone@eldritch.cafe

                                  @futurebird @emilychwiggy over the past few years in the UK we've had at least a couple local councils found to be talking about "warehousing" disabled people:

                                  https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/25/warehouse-disabled-people-bristol-city-council

                                  Which, as a disabled person in the UK living somewhat locally to these areas, has been terrifying to watch (especially given these are just tge ones we know about, and because I've wstched peopke brush this off as unimportant)

                                  futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  futurebird@sauropods.win
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #17

                                  @TheSunnyOne @emilychwiggy

                                  It's not "unimportant" any time the state or a company hired by the state is charged with "keeping" people be they disabled, or people jailed but not convicted like many collected by ICE that system ... if it should exist at all needs to be transparent.

                                  Don't tell me I can't visit, I can't take photos, I can't talk to anyone.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • emilychwiggy@mastodon.artE emilychwiggy@mastodon.art

                                    @futurebird the nazis were incredibly prolific in disseminating propaganda that people would still believe 90 years later. From the efficient governing, over the consistent ideology, to the "german" engineering of the war machine

                                    But like they were full of people with idiosyncratic ideas and beliefs, full of yes men only out for personal benefit.

                                    Himmler was obsessed with some weird germanic pseudo myth,
                                    Hitler with impractical architecture…

                                    burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    burnitdown@beige.party
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #18

                                    @emilychwiggy @futurebird

                                    this is another one of those instances where i have to say, yes Hitler and those close to him where terrible people, but look at where they got their ideas from. the nazis did not appear out of a vacuum, but out of a century of brutal colonialism that produced some horrifying photos such as the one of a mountain of buffalo skulls.

                                    the nazi lies persist because we live under a mountain of colonial narrative which is itself an enormous pack of lies. it wasn't just some nasty Germans obsessed with "national identity", it was all over Europe in the 19th century. it's why Canada and USA exist as nation states. Hitler took a lot of inspiration from the extremely violent ideas and laws of John A. MacDonald and his government, the first parliament of Canada, many of which are still in the books today.

                                    what's different in Canada today? Indigenous people are over-represented in incarceration. traumatised Indigenous children are further traumatised by family separation, which caused the generational trauma in the first place, but now the "Childrens' Aid Society" does it instead of the North West Mounted Police, who are now the RCMP. if a Black woman who is an elected representative holds up a tiny little placard in Ontario Parliament, to denounce another white supremacist genocide, the "left wing" party will do the work of the openly fascist party and kick her out.

                                    but talk about these things with your average uneducated blockhead, and they'll look at you like you're from Neptune.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA adrianriskin@kolektiva.social

                                      @burnitdown @futurebird @emilychwiggy

                                      Great story! I thought he told an abbreviated version of this on his album We Have Fed You All For A Thousand Years but now I can't find it. I know I've heard the part about handing your brain over to someone for eight hours a day. The long version in this clip is excellent!

                                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      burnitdown@beige.party
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #19

                                      @AdrianRiskin @futurebird @emilychwiggy

                                      he probably recited this poem many times at many shows, in a different way every time. the track you're looking for is called The Two Bums, which is also the name of the poem.

                                      i was really thinking of a different track when i posted that. this is the one that made the message even clearer. "who controls the blame pattern? why is it that large bodies of workers in my country always try to assign blame downwards to people trying to get a little something for nothing?"

                                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3duIB8pNFtk

                                      adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • burnitdown@beige.partyB burnitdown@beige.party

                                        @AdrianRiskin @futurebird @emilychwiggy

                                        he probably recited this poem many times at many shows, in a different way every time. the track you're looking for is called The Two Bums, which is also the name of the poem.

                                        i was really thinking of a different track when i posted that. this is the one that made the message even clearer. "who controls the blame pattern? why is it that large bodies of workers in my country always try to assign blame downwards to people trying to get a little something for nothing?"

                                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3duIB8pNFtk

                                        adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        adrianriskin@kolektiva.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        adrianriskin@kolektiva.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #20

                                        @burnitdown @futurebird @emilychwiggy

                                        I did listen to that track on the album but he doesn't tell it there. Yeah, the blame pattern is another banger!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                          Disabled people were among the first victims of the Nazis. What I did not know was that this program of eugenics through murder was very furtive at first. They knew that "do gooders" and "the church" would object to killing disabled people, often children just to save money.

                                          They were careful not to have too many deaths at any one center at first. But as the stress of war created further chaos they become more open about these murders.

                                          paulc@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          paulc@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          paulc@mstdn.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #21

                                          @futurebird There was a lot of resistance by the public to the execution of disabled people. It didn't stop the Nazis from killing them but they worked hard to make it appear that it wasn't happening.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper