Are we all millenials here or is that a misperception?

[marjolica@social.linux.pizza]

@thordis for those that don't know what the generation cut dates are I found this:

Generation Birth Year
Generation Alpha 2013–2025
Generation Z 1997–2012
Millennials (Gen Y) 1981–1996
Generation X 1965–1980
Baby Boomers 1946–1964
Silent Generation 1928–1945
Greatest Generation 1901–1927

However pooling Boomers and Alphas as in the questionnaire doesn't make much sense though.

[atzanteol@techhub.social]

@PermaSolarPotter @david_kehm @thordis
Because we don't constantly begin discussions with "as a gen X..." like millennials do.

[russcheshire@mastodon.scot]

@thordis Boomer. Identifies as antedeluvian...

[gareth@tenforward.social]

@thordis I think 'Xennial' is the more official term now, but I always think of myself as the "Star Wars Generation" from the following article:

https://joelhousman.com/blog/2016/5/23/the-star-wars-generation

[trashgaylie@aethy.com]

@thordis i misclicked 🥺 im Gen Z but accidentally picked Gen X
barely missed being a Millenial by 3 years or so

[urbanfoxe@mastodon.ie]

@hajni @thordis Gen X is busy holding it together. We're looking after our Boomer parents, our Gen Z kids and talking our little Millennial siblings down from despair, and we still end up being the ones figuring out what's for dinner every day.

[pterry@fnordon.de]

@Viss @thordis depends in the country I'd guess, and the again there's a difference between rural and urban areas. Before the internet was widely available, everything was a lot less homogenous. (I'm going with Xennial atm.)

[kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@PermaSolarPotter @david_kehm @thordis I and the people I know don't accept gen X as an identity. There was a rationale for commenting on the baby boomer generation as a distinct thing, but gen X and later are arbitrary, and regardless using it as an identity instead of discussion of the environment the group experienced is nonsense.
The manufactured history of labeling generations seems to be taking hold now and people are identifying themselves and others with their generation.

[shadsterling@mastodon.social]

@contrasocial @ReggieHere @hajni @thordis I wonder if Gen X is ignored because, coming after boomers, thy didn’t get the benefits and don’t get the blame, but being immediately after they had it good enough that they don’t complain about everything getting dragged away by the boomers, but millennials got so much less they could see sooner how bad it was headed for

[dlakelan@mastodon.sdf.org]

@urbanfoxe
Man I felt that for real for real.
@hajni @thordis

[quixoticgeek@social.v.st]

@marjolica @thordis there's no one definitive definition. I've also seen

1946-1964 - baby boomers
1965-1984 - gen x
1985-2005 - millennials

Etc... as that way each generation is exactly 20 years.

The origin stories podcast had an episode last week called "boomers" which talks about the various ways the generations can be defined.

[chigaze@mstdn.ca]

@thordis Not sure about your server but the fediverse as a whole has leaned Gen X the last few years. Perhaps you'll start changing that.

[caminaensilencio@masto.es]

@szczurtorebkowy Xennial too ️

[dot@noc.social]

@thordis too old to be gen z, too young to be millenial

[cptbutton@dice.camp]

@thordis

Based on the personality descriptions I read in Newsweek* a few decades back, my older siblings are clearly Boomers, while I am a leading edge X'er.

* Or a similar magazine.

[ton@m.tzyl.eu]

@thordis none of us are marketing shorthand labels here, no.

[crcollins@writing.exchange]

@quixoticgeek

I prefer Generation Jones for us later born Boomers.

@marjolica @thordis

[lanaehforaday@universeodon.com]

@thordis

I am 68 and in my day and age we did not have these labels to identify you by age so I m NONE OF THIS.

You can group me into some mass group because of my age but I am neurodivergent so the label DOES NOT FIT.

If you want ot know what age we are, I am 68

[u0421793@toot.pikopublish.ing]

@marjolica @thordis this must be a regional or foreign assessment of things. Even into the early 60s there was rationing and food shortages, everything was in black and white, people were wearing ex-forces demob clothing. Houses were missing and bomb craters were in every street. It certainly wasn’t a time of ‘boom’. It’d be a significant time before any rebuilding could be afforded and the onset of ‘swinging London’ in the late 60s was more a public relations effort than anyone’s actual reality. Maybe in other countries it was, but certainly not in the real world of post-war Britain.

[tsyum@thepit.social]

@thordis I'm curious to know (if we can know) which generation is the most privacy-concerned and less likely to answer the poll