WE DID IT. WE WON.
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu
Kudos to everyone who put in the hard work to make this happen. -
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu HELL YES!!!!!
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu you all should get you a slice of this (per Google AI):
"As of mid-2025, the Wikimedia Foundation holds approximately $72 million in cash and cash equivalents, along with about $213 million in short-term investments. Overall, its total net assets stand at around $296.5 million."
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu
That's some impressive numbers. Even if *every* abstention were counted as 'no' it would still be at 75% support. -
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu I did not know there were actual employees at Wikimedia. You have destroyed my image of what it is all about.
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu@social.wikiworkersunited.org Congratulations!
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu congratulations!
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu congratulations!
️ -
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu Today seems like a good day to donate to Wikipedia!
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu Fuck
'em up!
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu Congratulations to all of you!
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu We can send money now!
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu huh, almost like they could have just recognized the union when the majority of folks joined…blargh.
Still, congrats y’all!!!
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu alrighty, I'm resuming my annual donation then
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
-
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]@wwu Honestly, I would be curious to hear why anyone would vote against such a union
"No thanks, I'd rather not work together to ensure the best conditions under which to do this work that we love"... -
WE DID IT. WE WON.
Wikimedia Foundation workers voted 158 YES to 14 NO: 91.9% of ballots cast, with 81% turnout.
[1] https://www.nlrb.gov/case/20-RC-391740
We’re so proud of everyone who built this union, and this win belongs to our whole community. We could not have done it without the solidarity of Wikimedia volunteers.
This is just the beginning. We stand with our UK siblings in their recognition process now, and with future organizing efforts across WMF’s global workforce.
[union needed]Congratulations, and Keep The Red Flag Flying High
-
@wwu Honestly, I would be curious to hear why anyone would vote against such a union
"No thanks, I'd rather not work together to ensure the best conditions under which to do this work that we love"...@jwcph @wwu As someone who once worked at a company where a unionization effort failed by _one_ vote: never underestimate the amount of money/effort an employer will pour into dirty union-busting tricks.
Given the landslide victory in this case, I have to figure employees were remarkably well-educated on the matter.
-
@jwcph @wwu As someone who once worked at a company where a unionization effort failed by _one_ vote: never underestimate the amount of money/effort an employer will pour into dirty union-busting tricks.
Given the landslide victory in this case, I have to figure employees were remarkably well-educated on the matter.
@kgf @wwu I know; I've seen examples of the propaganda (though it doesn't happen here & may in fact be illegal) - but I still have a hard time grasping that anyone will believe that the basically-no-downsides can possibly outweigh the plethora of almost free upsides... I guess there'll always be people who think they can only prosper at the expense of their colleagues.
